Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

When will these blokes choose Pepsi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

    https://delphihealthgroup.com/drug-cutting/marijuana/. Read this one and it may explain the reasons for lacing it with other substances .
    Mate no offence but that stuff is all rubbish. That is not how cannabis is cultivated. Growers are not able to "cut" anything and nor would it be desirable if possible. For dealers it also does not make any sense. You are talking about adding a foreign substance to plant material (flowers). It would ruin the taste and alter the effects but it would not make economic sense either.

    In California for example, despite legal medicinal and recreational cannabis, there is still a large black market. Mexican cartels set up and grow in State Forests. This causes immense environmental problems. Also this cannabis is likely HEAVILY covered in chemicals such as pesticides. It is possible to cut your cannabis yourself. I have seen bogans add amphetamines to their cannabis and smoke it but that was something such people did deliberately. You could add anything more or less and smoke it if you want. Keith Richards smoked his father's ashes.
    Last edited by Dr. Voodoo Man; 09-30-2021, 05:09 PM.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by roostersrule2 View Post
      Bro I am in my early 20’s, I am the expert because what they’re studying I’m experiencing.

      You are going by someone whose studied something and then you a third party is reading that and making their own judgments and assumptions. I’m telling you these things because they’re fact lol, your information is from a secondary source my information is the source. I’m not trying to be arrogant but it’s as if you’re listening to a commentator talk about rugby league instead of a player, which one do you really think is going to know more?

      Good luck to you young fella . I totally disagree that your the expert because your hitting the gear. An expert is not what i would call it but I think its time we agree to disagree and maybe get back to me in 10 years or so

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Dr. Voodoo Man View Post

        Mate no offence but that stuff is all rubbish. That is not how cannabis is cultivated. Growers are not able to "cut" anything and nor would it be desirable if possible. For dealers it also does not make any sense. You are talking about adding a foreign substance to plant material (flowers). It would ruin the taste and alter the effects but it would not make economic sense either.

        In California for example, despite legal medicinal and recreational cannabis, there is still a large black market. Mexican cartels set up and grow in State Forests. This causes immense environmental problems. Also this cannabis is likely HEAVILY covered in chemicals such as pesticides. It is possible to cut your cannabis yourself. I have seen bogans add amphetamines to their cannabis and smoke it but that was something such people did deliberately. You could add anything more or less and smoke it if you want. Keith Richards smoked his father's ashes.
        Gday Voodoo it may or not be rubbish but the people we talk to in health inform that it isn't . At the end of the day it doesn't change anything if I believe and you don't or visa versa. Drugs of any description isn't smart . neither is excess alcohol , or getting hooked on prescribed drugs , same thing but the quack that gave them to someone told them the dose to take and for how long . They didn't tell them to doctor hop our buy them illegally . As for economic sense I think it would be more about the additive sense .

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

          Gday Voodoo it may or not be rubbish but the people we talk to in health inform that it isn't . At the end of the day it doesn't change anything if I believe and you don't or visa versa. Drugs of any description isn't smart . neither is excess alcohol , or getting hooked on prescribed drugs , same thing but the quack that gave them to someone told them the dose to take and for how long . They didn't tell them to doctor hop our buy them illegally . As for economic sense I think it would be more about the additive sense .
          I agree with you that drug abuse is bad and addiction is no doubt a terrible thing. Regarding Cannabis I consider myself a high level connaisseur. I don't smoke ever. I have glass pieces and vaporizers to the value of about 10K. These days it is pretty easy to choose from sativas, indicas, CBD and hybrids. It is becoming more and more accepted by the day. If my supplier added anything extra I would be so dumbfounded but I have never experienced that.

          It is certainly possible to overdo it and abuse the herb though.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Dr. Voodoo Man View Post

            I agree with you that drug abuse is bad and addiction is no doubt a terrible thing. Regarding Cannabis I consider myself a high level connaisseur. I don't smoke ever. I have glass pieces and vaporizers to the value of about 10K. These days it is pretty easy to choose from sativas, indicas, CBD and hybrids. It is becoming more and more accepted by the day. If my supplier added anything extra I would be so dumbfounded but I have never experienced that.

            It is certainly possible to overdo it and abuse the herb though.
            That's good , keep it under control and should be right .For those with mental health who use it , just to sleep and don't take there meds it's not .That's all my original statement said .It's cause issue for those poor people and mostly the don't realise

            Comment


            • #96
              This thread needs a bex

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
                Good luck to you young fella . I totally disagree that your the expert because your hitting the gear. An expert is not what i would call it but I think its time we agree to disagree and maybe get back to me in 10 years or so
                Hitting the gear? Hahahah

                Cleary we aren’t going to agree, you can live in your world where alcohol is good because it’s legal and the rest are bad because they’re illegal, and I’ll just pick and go as I please.

                By your standards I’ll have OD’d in 10 years so won’t be able to get back to you mate

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by roostersrule2 View Post
                  Hitting the gear? Hahahah

                  Cleary we aren’t going to agree, you can live in your world where alcohol is good because it’s legal and the rest are bad because they’re illegal, and I’ll just pick and go as I please.

                  By your standards I’ll have OD’d in 10 years so won’t be able to get back to you mate
                  I didn't say alcohol was good .I said it was legal , fact

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by roostersrule2 View Post
                    Bro I am in my early 20’s, I am the expert because what they’re studying I’m experiencing.

                    You are going by someone whose studied something and then you a third party is reading that and making their own judgments and assumptions. I’m telling you these things because they’re fact lol, your information is from a secondary source my information is the source. I’m not trying to be arrogant but it’s as if you’re listening to a commentator talk about rugby league instead of a player, which one do you really think is going to know more?

                    "I am in my early 20's, I am the expert".

                    Bewdy! We might be able to save a shed load in research costs and scientific analysis, now we got you.

                    Any limits to your expertise?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ism22 View Post

                      My perspective is...
                      - I don't want anything to do with drug dealers. I think that once you're going out of your way to discover them and try lotsa different banned substances, a habit has formed. To me there's a big gap between sipping a beer at the dinner table and experimenting with illegal stuff purely to experience a different sort of high. Thrill seeking and socialising with dealers is very different from having a beer.

                      - From a risk management perspective, we know the long-term effects of alcohol and tobacco since they've been used so widely. Illegal drugs come with unquantifiable risks (physical, mental and social) which is dangerous in itself. For example most people who have been scheduled into mental health facilities have a history of abusing various illegal substances (sometimes it takes just one bong aged 15 to trigger lifelong psychotic illnesses). Maybe it's just 'them' and not 'you' but as somebody who has had a pretty farked up life already, I'm not willing to risk any illegal shyte with unknown consequences.

                      - Above all, dealing with crooks and actively breaking the law says a lot about one's character. Whether or not you agree with a law is largely irrelevant. I mean... it's illegal to possess pornographic cartoons that depict Bart having sex with Lisa... this is strictly speaking incest and child abuse material. I dare say a few of us may have stumbled upon such photos online while browsing through comedy sites (and nobody would consider such people paedophiles, or accessories to crime on the basis that they didn't immediately call the police). However, I don't think this makes consumption of such materials okay. If you're actively asking dealers for more images of this nature and collecting them on your computer then you're developing an illegal habit that says something about your character. May mot mean your the AFP's most wanted paedophile. But... it's a disregard for the law all the same, and a slight deviation from '1 or 2 funny pictures' (e.g. trying to bring home some child abuse materials from a Japanese comic store) is actually a pretty darn serious crime. With crimes, the boundaries ALWAYS have to sit somewhere and there will ALWAYS be people arguing that something sitting 2mm over the line isn't a 'real crime'. However, why test it? Why actively network with people who are pushing the boundaries to the next level and seek advice from them on how you might emulate some of their experiences? IMO deliberately (and regularly) testing the line, with a blatant disregard for the fact that it exists says something about CHARACTER. If we're talking about footy players who we're considering throwing big money at then I think their CHARACTER (not the little individual mistakes they've made) is what counts.
                      Thats a good read.
                      Good onya Jizz.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Jacks Fur Coat View Post

                        "I am in my early 20's, I am the expert".

                        Bewdy! We might be able to save a shed load in research costs and scientific analysis, now we got you.

                        Any limits to your expertise?
                        No limits whatsoever solider.

                        Probably should have said the case study rather than the expert, but it was pretty easy to decipher my point if context has any credence.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by roostersrule2 View Post
                          Bro I am in my early 20’s, I am the expert because what they’re studying I’m experiencing.

                          You are going by someone whose studied something and then you a third party is reading that and making their own judgments and assumptions. I’m telling you these things because they’re fact lol, your information is from a secondary source my information is the source. I’m not trying to be arrogant but it’s as if you’re listening to a commentator talk about rugby league instead of a player, which one do you really think is going to know more?

                          Cooper Cronk , Brad Filter , Andrew Johns , Gus Gould

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

                            Cooper Cronk , Brad Filter , Andrew Johns , Gus Gould
                            All 4 of these were rugby league players and at least 2 of them were avid drug takers

                            I could not have thought of shitter examples

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by roostersrule2 View Post
                              All 4 of these were rugby league players and at least 2 of them were avid drug takers

                              I could not have thought of shitter examples
                              Mate you asked about commentators which they all are, stop changing the rules .Also Peter Sterling

                              Comment


                              • LOL all of you blokes are pussies who really gives a flying f*** what others decide to do with their own money and their own time? Its their health not yours so simmer down, no point naming all these big bad ideas you associated with drugs because take it from me it wont help anyone.. its going in one ear straight out the other.

                                This is a rooster's forum not some intervention type BS

                                Simmer down and control what only YOU can control.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X