Originally posted by Sizzle
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Angus Crichton
Collapse
X
-
It wouldn’t surprise me if he gets a smaller contract next time he is off contract as I don’t think he’s turned out to be a 700-800k backrower (not yet anyway) however I’d be very surprised if we’re asking him to take a pay cut next year... why would he? He’s got a contract and it’s not like he hasn’t lived up to his end of that contract.
Very odd piece from Rothfield.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Source: somebody watched us play against Brisbane and then listened to Robbo's interview + Braith's comments. Shhhhhh... Sitili's playing good at the moment and will probably start ahead of Crichton while he's returning from an MCL injury.Originally posted by BUDDY View Post
5peat. The article says beyond next year.
It doesn't actually say much but when it is under one of Buzz's SHOOSH sections you know it must be true.
SHOOSH
Edge forward Angus Crichton will have to take a significant pay cut to remain with the Sydney Roosters beyond next year. The club’s number one priority is upgrading Sitili Tupouniua, who has been in sensational form.
Keep that hush though ay! With the recent COVID outbreak at the Tattersalls, I don't want people knowing that me and Nick were there. Promise you'll keep it a secret, bro?
- 1 like
Comment
-
haha, they love putting their own spin on things too. obviously keeping sitili and giving him an upgrade is a priority but so is keeping teddy. and you might read the article and think that we're preferring sitili to angus whereas i presume we want to keep both.Originally posted by ism22 View Post
Source: somebody watched us play against Brisbane and then listened to Robbo's interview + Braith's comments. Shhhhhh... Sitili's playing good at the moment and will probably start ahead of Crichton while he's returning from an MCL injury.
Keep that hush though ay! With the recent COVID outbreak at the Tattersalls, I don't want people knowing that me and Nick were there. Promise you'll keep it a secret, bro?
- 1 like
Comment
-
Mate, when I post the article (only I can see it in full or other subscribers) but it won't allow you to see it (unless you're a subscriber to the wesbite)... sorryOriginally posted by Waylander View PostCan you not post the article instead of a subscriber only link?Last edited by DP1990; 08-31-2020, 03:35 PM.
Comment
-
If we are talking about 2022 then by then we could lose Maubs, Bmoz, Jmoz, SBW, Hall and possibly Flanno and Friend.
I think most of the ones that needed an upgrade have got one except for Teddy, Sitili, Walker (?).
Surely that gives us a bit of change for Crichton. But I agree it will probably be for a little less than what he is on.
- 1 like
Comment
-
I also wonder what shape Cords will be in by then??? He isn't old but he beats himself up big time!!!!Originally posted by BUDDY View PostIf we are talking about 2022 then by then we could lose Maubs, Bmoz, Jmoz, SBW, Hall and possibly Flanno and Friend.
I think most of the ones that needed an upgrade have got one except for Teddy, Sitili, Walker (?).
Surely that gives us a bit of change for Crichton. But I agree it will probably be for a little less than what he is on.
Comment
-
Don't agree he isn't worth 700-800k. When he's on the field he is consistently one of our best and considering he'll be 26 when he comes off contract I'd say there are plenty of clubs around who would give him that kind of money. As has been alluded to our second row stocks aren't amazing, he's certainly one I'd like to keep. That being said, Robbo and Nick certainly aren't telling Buzz Rothfield of their re-signing preferences so you probably can't give the article much creditOriginally posted by Rooster_6 View PostIt wouldn’t surprise me if he gets a smaller contract next time he is off contract as I don’t think he’s turned out to be a 700-800k backrower (not yet anyway) however I’d be very surprised if we’re asking him to take a pay cut next year... why would he? He’s got a contract and it’s not like he hasn’t lived up to his end of that contract.
Very odd piece from Rothfield.Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results
- 1 like
Comment



Comment