Originally posted by Dr. Voodoo Man
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bunker - Fraud watch
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Carlos Parra View Post
He's looking at 1 week apparently.
Some on here want to whinge & say the NRL have favorites but if a Rooster player did the same & it was his first offence he would only get 1 weeks as well.
The non sin binning was were they farked up.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by player 1 View Post
No it doesn't indicate that at all.
More to the point, why do you care so much what I think or say?
You just annoy me how you continually go on about how hard done the Roosters are & how the refs, bunker, judiciary & NRL are out to get us.
Why do you put yourself through such misery?
Imagine sitting next to you at a game all you would do is whinge even when we have won.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by player 1 View Post
BTW, I hate to break the bad news to you, but everyone on this anonymous internet forum is screaming into the abyss. That includes you, wise guy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mickie Lane View Post
You just annoy me how you continually go on about how hard done the Roosters are & how the refs, bunker, judiciary & NRL are out to get us.
Why do you put yourself through such misery?
Imagine sitting next to you at a game all you would do is whinge even when we have won.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by player 1 View Post
Imagine living next door to, or being a family member of a junkie and having to worry about being robbed. That would be annoying.
Come on man come up with something better than that.
What my life is now is not what it was 35 years ago.
Im one of the lucky ones you dill.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Hey player 1 you're are entitled to think that but the garbage you just came out with doesnt worry me.
I made it out of that & have lived a pretty good life since Ive been clean.
I became a registered nurse & nursed for 17 years & guess what area I worked in?
Drug & alcohol. Ironic ay.
- 4 likes
Comment
-
It has reached the point where the dread of watching games, in full expectation of shithouse refs and match officials (+injuries) now outweighs the joy of watching the team play and win.1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.
- 4 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carlos Parra View PostIt has reached the point where the dread of watching games, in full expectation of shithouse refs and match officials (+injuries) now outweighs the joy of watching the team play and win.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mickie Lane View Post
Maybe its time you started following another sport.
RL is my game and my love for it will not be diminished by rule changes, corrupt officials or people who make directive comments like you.Last edited by Carlos Parra; 08-26-2024, 11:42 AM.1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
so Jolliff from the titties does the identical hit as Murray from souffs did , you know the one that knock Spencer out (HIA) goes on report and gets nothing. he has 2 priors. ffs . murray should use that footage as evidence to get off. around the 68minute mark1911 1912 1913 1923 1935 1936 1937 1940 1945 1974 1975 2002 2013 2018 2019 2020
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mickie Lane View Post
Okay
You consistently bang on all the time about how the Roosters are rorted & reamed by the refs, bunker & NRL which indicates to me that you are convinced we cant win the comp so why do you watch the NRL?
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by OMR View Post
Whilst it’s not an intentional targeting nor the roosters you’d have to agree that JWH and Radley had been judged a bit more harshly than others with similar offences. Even past players and journos are using them as examples . I’ve heard it asked quite frequently “ what if that has been Jared or Radley? Would they have come up with the same ruling?” Which indicated that others ( non roosters fans) have noticed the bias towards those two players .
Comment
-
Originally posted by OMR View Post
Whilst it’s not an intentional targeting nor the roosters you’d have to agree that JWH and Radley had been judged a bit more harshly than others with similar offences. Even past players and journos are using them as examples . I’ve heard it asked quite frequently “ what if that has been Jared or Radley? Would they have come up with the same ruling?” Which indicated that others ( non roosters fans) have noticed the bias towards those two players .
Comment
Comment