> They turned on Dutton bigtime- like it was all his fault. The most ridiculous was Andrew Bolt who said that Dutton needed to make a public stance and criticise Trump to show he wouldn't be intimidated and also something about it was a mistake not fighting culture wars. He then topped it off by blaming the Australian voters. These old geezers are really experienced at the blame game.
I heard Bill Shorten breaking it down on ABC today. He's got his ALP biases but essentially said that:
- Trump screwed it for everybody. But... if you'd asked him in Feb, Dutton was the favourite to win on a Trump-like platform. Politics can be like that.
- In hindsight, Dutton’s team mishandled the cost-of-living crisis by proposing job cuts, scrapping WFH (which saves outer suburb residents on tolls, childcare, etc.), and cutting support like nurses’ prac placement payments. At the same time, he planned massive spending on nuclear power and military aid to Israel, while reducing aid to Palestinians. The optics were clear: money was being shifted from struggling Aussies to nuclear ambitions and foreign conflicts — not a winning message for Gen Z voters focused on everyday costs.
- He was trying to appeal to 'Howard's battlers' from 1996... that is... working class ALP voters from the outer suburbs who became more conservative when they hit ~50-60. They're all either gone or in nursing homes today. Also, the outer suburbs are full of Gen Z voters (see the above para).
I heard Bill Shorten breaking it down on ABC today. He's got his ALP biases but essentially said that:
- Trump screwed it for everybody. But... if you'd asked him in Feb, Dutton was the favourite to win on a Trump-like platform. Politics can be like that.
- In hindsight, Dutton’s team mishandled the cost-of-living crisis by proposing job cuts, scrapping WFH (which saves outer suburb residents on tolls, childcare, etc.), and cutting support like nurses’ prac placement payments. At the same time, he planned massive spending on nuclear power and military aid to Israel, while reducing aid to Palestinians. The optics were clear: money was being shifted from struggling Aussies to nuclear ambitions and foreign conflicts — not a winning message for Gen Z voters focused on everyday costs.
- He was trying to appeal to 'Howard's battlers' from 1996... that is... working class ALP voters from the outer suburbs who became more conservative when they hit ~50-60. They're all either gone or in nursing homes today. Also, the outer suburbs are full of Gen Z voters (see the above para).
Comment