This player will make a big difference..

[Guest]

Who cares how many people he has bashedand what gender they are as long as he can play footy that's all that counts. This is rugby league not a morality contest. The problem is you have too many cucks in this world now like Danish who get triggered every 15 seconds over something or other and sudden you gotta think of the children and women and can't use gender specific pronouns, soon we will had NRL safe spaces. They same people getting all moral high and mighty probably want the punch ons in the game to return. Violence is acceptable only on your terms. Stop watching a violent sport played by violent men.

2 words come to mind when i read this dribble

Farken Idiot

[Guest]

No.

Because you can't, dopey

[novice chook]

Who cares how many people he has bashedand what gender they are as long as he can play footy that's all that counts. This is rugby league not a morality contest. The problem is you have too many cucks in this world now like Danish who get triggered every 15 seconds over something or other and sudden you gotta think of the children and women and can't use gender specific pronouns, soon we will had NRL safe spaces. They same people getting all moral high and mighty probably want the punch ons in the game to return. Violence is acceptable only on your terms. Stop watching a violent sport played by violent men.

As a female supporter of the game and this club, I certainly care about how many people this player has bashed. And there are many female supporters of the game who care as well, as well as male ones. You need to remember there is a woman out there who suffered abuse at this bloke's hands and no rehabilitation in the world can change that. And it's an insult to her and others in her position to make light of that fact, and to infer that the only thing that matters is that he can play footy.

I suspect that the parents of the children the game is trying to attract also care about the character traits of the players they are encouraging their child to support.

As Bigchook has pointed out, there is a difference between violence and aggression. I have no problem with aggression on the field, so long as that's where it stays. As for violence, I have no tolerance for it on or off the field.

I would prefer that Tetevano was not a member of the Roosters squad. And I certainly won't be cheering for him as an individual. He will get a cheer as part of our team, if that's what he is, and that's it.

[Tommy Smith]

Boogie you're either a troll or a bigger turd than Tetevano himself. Or both.

I made my thoughts on his signing perfectly clear a while back - he doesn't deserve to wear our colours; nor does he deserve a chance to play in the NRL again.

But, he's here now so obviously I hope he plays well and more importantly continues to improve as a person off the field.

[Moose]

As a female supporter of the game and this club, I certainly care about how many people this player has bashed. And there are many female supporters of the game who care as well, as well as male ones. You need to remember there is a woman out there who suffered abuse at this bloke's hands and no rehabilitation in the world can change that. And it's an insult to her and others in her position to make light of that fact, and to infer that the only thing that matters is that he can play footy.

I suspect that the parents of the children the game is trying to attract also care about the character traits of the players they are encouraging their child to support.

As Bigchook has pointed out, there is a difference between violence and aggression. I have no problem with aggression on the field, so long as that's where it stays. As for violence, I have no tolerance for it on or off the field.

I would prefer that Tetevano was not a member of the Roosters squad. And I certainly won't be cheering for him as an individual. He will get a cheer as part of our team, if that's what he is, and that's it.

Very mature and a very good post.

[Guest]

As a female supporter of the game and this club, I certainly care about how many people this player has bashed. And there are many female supporters of the game who care as well, as well as male ones. You need to remember there is a woman out there who suffered abuse at this bloke's hands and no rehabilitation in the world can change that. And it's an insult to her and others in her position to make light of that fact, and to infer that the only thing that matters is that he can play footy.

I suspect that the parents of the children the game is trying to attract also care about the character traits of the players they are encouraging their child to support.

As Bigchook has pointed out, there is a difference between violence and aggression. I have no problem with aggression on the field, so long as that's where it stays. As for violence, I have no tolerance for it on or off the field.

I would prefer that Tetevano was not a member of the Roosters squad. And I certainly won't be cheering for him as an individual. He will get a cheer as part of our team, if that's what he is, and that's it.

Whilst I agree with you on Tetevano you are also a nutcase who thought SBW was the incarnation of Satin himself. Meh

[milanja]

SO you'd be cool with it if he'd been chinning your sister/daughter?

He would probably be the champ doing it, since he has no problem with it.

[Guest]

Why thank yuh, thank yuh very much Elvis..but I'm not actually a bloke. There are lots of Elvisess around these parts, or should that be Elvi?

lol sorry about that.
Thank ya very much maaam!
I think the correct term is Elvii.

[Guest]

Violence and aggression aren't the same thing.

No they are not the same like Strawberries and cream.

[mightyrooster]

As a female supporter of the game and this club, I certainly care about how many people this player has bashed. And there are many female supporters of the game who care as well, as well as male ones. You need to remember there is a woman out there who suffered abuse at this bloke's hands and no rehabilitation in the world can change that. And it's an insult to her and others in her position to make light of that fact, and to infer that the only thing that matters is that he can play footy.

I suspect that the parents of the children the game is trying to attract also care about the character traits of the players they are encouraging their child to support.

As Bigchook has pointed out, there is a difference between violence and aggression. I have no problem with aggression on the field, so long as that's where it stays. As for violence, I have no tolerance for it on or off the field.

I would prefer that Tetevano was not a member of the Roosters squad. And I certainly won't be cheering for him as an individual. He will get a cheer as part of our team, if that's what he is, and that's it.

Nicely said NC.

[mightyrooster]

Why thank yuh, thank yuh very much Elvis..but I'm not actually a bloke. There are lots of Elvisess around these parts, or should that be Elvi?

Welcome back RWB. And you're right about there being too many Elvi on here. I'm more of a Beatles girl myself!

[mightyrooster]

Let me just say this guy admitted to bashing his partner on four separate occasions. I hate the thought of seeing him in our famous colours.

[redwhiteblue]

Name 5

Apart from the content you mean? Well, the spelling, grammar and poor use of punctuation are quite offensive too.

[redwhiteblue]

Violence and aggression aren't the same thing.

Of course not. Adrian Morley is an aggressive player but I don't remember him ever being convicted of violent crimes.

[redwhiteblue]

Whilst I agree with you on Tetevano you are also a nutcase who thought SBW was the incarnation of Satin himself. Meh

Don't you call NC a nutcase! Especially since I am the nutcase who didn't want SBW here and I freely admitted I was very wrong! And I never referred to him as Satin! Cotton or Silk maybe, but certainly never Satin...! Don't you have sandwiches to fry Elvis? So many of you on here I can't remember which one is which..