Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who was the bigger loss? Latrell or Cronk!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who was the bigger loss? Latrell or Cronk!

    As per the subject... if either of those played we are another level...

  • #2
    Latrell, pffffft.

    Cronk by an absolute mile!
    FVCK CANCER

    Comment


    • #3
      Latrell would have been handy in the second half.
      Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.

      Comment


      • #4
        LOL. J moz was just as good as LM for us, but can I say the same about Kyle? Hell no. The one time he ran the ball he got hammered by Croker and then disappeared. We lacked cronk’s composure and control.

        Comment


        • #5
          Cronk the bigger loss. We win last week with him in the team.

          in saying that Latrine would have finished of that try with his upper body strength in the 2nd half.

          Missed them both but Cronk the bigger loss

          Comment


          • #6
            Radley and Verrils.

            Comment


            • #7
              Cronk

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post
                Latrell, pffffft.

                Cronk by an absolute mile!
                This.

                Jmoz more than covered for Lattrell.

                Flanagan for Cronk....er no.

                Comment


                • #9
                  let's not go there, player turnover is a natural outcome of salary cap era championship teams....however cronk by a mile...haha

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Cronk x 100 is a bigger loss.

                    To be frank, I rate Manu above Latrell.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Round 8 Storm 27 chooks 25
                      Round 10 chooks 20 raiders 24
                      Finals penrith 29 chooks 28
                      Finals chooks 18 raiders 22

                      11 points seperated us in 4 losses against the top teams. Cronk for sure because we just couldn't get over the line in the biggest games throughout the season.

                      We missed Mitchell's aggro though along with Radley. I don't really think any team feared us this season and it showed.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Put latrell and coops in tonight's side and we win no doubt about but its more than hard to win 2 in a row, its nearly impossible to win 3 in the modern game, I'm pretty sure that with the boy from Bronte and Sammy v in the side tonight we win .We lost the best chance for the threepeat by a point last week. Win that get a week off to sort out a few niggling injuries and who knows its history congratulations to the raiders,

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          In the end radley adds a lot to a hapless flanagan...Radley is the best player in the chooks next to teddy..
                          Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by chicka View Post
                            Round 8 Storm 27 chooks 25
                            Round 10 chooks 20 raiders 24
                            Finals penrith 29 chooks 28
                            Finals chooks 18 raiders 22

                            11 points seperated us in 4 losses against the top teams. Cronk for sure because we just couldn't get over the line in the biggest games throughout the season.

                            We missed Mitchell's aggro though along with Radley. I don't really think any team feared us this season and it showed.
                            those games were lost because of poor defence and errors- storm 2 intercept tries and chooks couldn't retrieve two short kick offs- raiders 3 tries through the middle- riff put on 28 points unanswered - raiders put on 16 points via poor defence - Cronk would not have made any difference in those circumstances- one on one misses

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              We can't have the best players every year. If we kept Cronk or Latrell then we would have lost several other players.
                              We had the team to win, some times the ball just does not bounce your way.
                              We could have very easily lost last year with both those players.
                              I have great expectations for next year.
                              Go the Chooks

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X