Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Instant Karma - Mcgregor gone for DUI lol
Collapse
X
-
What a leader. Going on benders in the nights / the day before a big game. That's leading by example. He is so far out of his depth it is not funny.
If Knight copped four weeks for his recent DUI - which, admittedly was high range - what will the NRL punishment for this donkey be?
-
.063, barely went over.
Still a punishment or suspension is required, roosters will probably cop the suspension because we bullied him and he was depressed, and had no other option than drink.
Just slap another week onto the pearce suspension you nrl clowns.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LeCoq View PostWhat a leader. Going on benders in the nights / the day before a big game. That's leading by example. He is so far out of his depth it is not funny.
If Knight copped four weeks for his recent DUI - which, admittedly was high range - what will the NRL punishment for this donkey be?
Pearce copped 9 weeks when he didn't even break the law. IMO they should take DUI more seriously. It's a pretty farked up thing to do and you can't really defend yourself against it if you register above the limit since it's a strict liability offence.
- 1 like
Comment
-
It has been reported that the St George Dragons failed to inform the NRL about the incident. Does anybody recall the punishment, if there was one, regarding Brad Fittler's drunken incident during his time as our head coach? I believe that drink driving should carry mandatory gaol sentencing as it puts people's lives in danger and there is no excuse for getting behind the wheel of a vehicle while intoxicated.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Braith Anasta's Wallet View PostIt has been reported that the St George Dragons failed to inform the NRL about the incident. Does anybody recall the punishment, if there was one, regarding Brad Fittler's drunken incident during his time as our head coach? I believe that drink driving should carry mandatory gaol sentencing as it puts people's lives in danger and there is no excuse for getting behind the wheel of a vehicle while intoxicated.was born a sydney roosters fanatic
"we're the roosters, we'll be fine"
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by redwhiteblue View PostIt's low range which means he'll probably get a slap on the wrist. He won't be fined anything like 125k or sent overseas to dry out in a clinic nor be stood down for 8 matches.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Braith Anasta's Wallet View PostIt has been reported that the St George Dragons failed to inform the NRL about the incident. Does anybody recall the punishment, if there was one, regarding Brad Fittler's drunken incident during his time as our head coach? I believe that drink driving should carry mandatory gaol sentencing as it puts people's lives in danger and there is no excuse for getting behind the wheel of a vehicle while intoxicated.
On that, do you then believe there should be a 0.00 tolerance for drink driving? Because even though 0.05 is the legal limit, some people who blow 0.04 are in a worse state than someone who blows 0.07.
Comment
-
Originally posted by milanja View Post
Fair opinion with the drink driving and you are entitled to it, but our prison system would not be able to cope.
On that, do you then believe there should be a 0.00 tolerance for drink driving? Because even though 0.05 is the legal limit, some people who blow 0.04 are in a worse state than someone who blows 0.07.
I think it is quite a good idea. Everyone knows how hard it is to have one drink at a pub and leave.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Teriyaki Chicken Boy View PostIn Hong Kong the legal limit is 0.0
I think it is quite a good idea. Everyone knows how hard it is to have one drink at a pub and leave.
0.05 is to easy for people to think they can have 4 drinks and still be right to drive. I think 0.02 is reasonable because it allows 1 drink and no more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by milanja View Post
Fair opinion with the drink driving and you are entitled to it, but our prison system would not be able to cope.
On that, do you then believe there should be a 0.00 tolerance for drink driving? Because even though 0.05 is the legal limit, some people who blow 0.04 are in a worse state than someone who blows 0.07.
Upon reflection of my comment I believe that the mandatory gaol sentencing should be for mid to higher range drink driving as I do recall seeing an episode of one of the RBT shows where a young man who was on his P plates was .01 over the limit from eating a Tiramisu so it would be foolish to send somebody to gaol for that. That is just my opinion and others are free to agree or disagree.
Comment
Comment