Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If I was James Graham, I'd walk the team off

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by LargeMike View Post

    Who cares about Inglis? He wasnt involved in that spectacle. classic whataboutism.

    Graham and Klemmer especially went too far. It was disgraceful. Kudos to that ref standing his ground and ultimately making the right decision.
    I will be honest, i would rather he made the wrong decision.
    ...

    Comment


    • #47
      I wrote what i wrote on half time. I could sense the stitch up. ImHO kassiano's knee concussed luke and the boot missed
      Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post

        Invasion of Referees personal space has definitely been a huge issue in the game for years. Good to see someone's cracking down on the hard issues that the media cover up.
        I think you should stick to the whole 'Maloney isnt the right fit for the club' rather than the comedy routine.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by The Axe View Post
          I wrote what i wrote on half time. I could sense the stitch up. ImHO kassiano's knee concussed luke and the boot missed
          Fake blood all over his face?
          ...

          Comment


          • #50
            The Inglis penalty, the penalty for the field goal cause Reynolds milked it, the lack of a penalty for Morris...........what goes around comes around. This won't do Souths any favours in the long term or the refs officiating without any common sense. Harrigan would never have that penalty.
            barbarian ......arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh!!!!!!!

            Comment


            • #51
              I have never seen a team get such a rails run as Souffs the last few years. Constant penalties to get out of their end. If they drop the ball it's almost always called a strip. And they almost have to murder someone to give up a penalty in defence.

              How is it possible that Morris didn't get a penalty from that kick off at the end? It was right in front of them. Kick to win the game even with the bias.
              Last edited by Johnny Tobin; 04-03-2015, 06:56 PM.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post

                Fake blood all over his face?
                The boot clearly missed The knee clearly struck
                I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Lets not forget the Dogs received a penalty in front of the sticks at 16-14 inside the last 10. Kick the goal and no one is attempting field goals.
                  ...

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post
                    Lets not forget the Dogs received a penalty in front of the sticks at 16-14 inside the last 10. Kick the goal and no one is attempting field goals.
                    True but not the point really
                    I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by LargeMike View Post

                      Who cares about Inglis? He wasnt involved in that spectacle. classic whataboutism.
                      Ive seen Inglis stand over the refs and abuse them with swear words twice this season
                      I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post

                        True but not the point really
                        You just didn't get the point. If the refs wanted Souths to win they wouldn't have awarded the penalty to the dogs 10 out and late in the count for what really was a 50/50 call. As a Roosters fan i would have expected an 8 point try and the final penalty if it were us and not Souths.
                        ...

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post
                          Lets not forget the Dogs received a penalty in front of the sticks at 16-14 inside the last 10. Kick the goal and no one is attempting field goals.
                          While that might have chewed up the clock a bit it would have only put the Dogs up 18-14, not even a converted try in front.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            eventually this was always going to happen? the disgusting bias continually shown to souths was eventually going to boil over , this week the opponents the dogs who also at their home ground and having the more genuine fans than souths reacted the way many teams have wanted too?if this isn't handled properly by the nrl it has the capacity to kill off the nrl! is it pandering to the bookies to get the result they wanted for the money? or just blind bias , we don't know, but we should and soon!i feel smithy is way out of his depth now?if nothing else the pro souffs easy penalties might be a memory for a while?

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by horrie hastings View Post

                              While that might have chewed up the clock a bit it would have only put the Dogs up 18-14, not even a converted try in front.
                              Souths would have lost the option to tie up the game with a penalty goal.
                              ...

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Common sense should have come into it with the James Graham incident in the last couple of minutes from the refs, I'm still struggling to see how it was awarded a penalty.
                                Cannot stick up for the behaviour of some of the Dogs fans though, had one of those full bottles or even half full bottles thrown hit someone in the head it could have killed them.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X