Originally posted by Rooster1908
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ban Michael Jones
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
Happy he has returned and hope some will not set him up for failure like in the past .
As I said he’s a wonderful not so new edition to this place. But he will slip up and be gone again and being a reformed character who continues to try and refine my behaviour I for one will not be querying our wonderful moderators on it should they see fit to get rid of him.Last edited by Andrew Walker; 09-22-2025, 09:53 PM.I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
Seems you may have slipped up in the past as well . Happy he has returned and hope some will not set him up for failure like in the past .
There are two flaws in your post.
1) No one has ever been set up by a chicken Kiev.
2) You can’t use the term ‘him’. ‘It’ would have been better.
Now before you start… the word ‘it’ is being respectful to Sally who clearly promoted the ‘it’ or they/them movement.FVCK CANCER
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
Blaming others for his demise is a victim mentality and lacks accountability. No matter what others say on here He like the rest of us are responsible for their own actions
As I said he’s a wonderful not so new edition to this place. But he will slip up and be gone again and being a reformed character who continues to try and refine my behaviour I for one will not be querying our wonderful moderators on it should they see fit to get rid of him.
Ban it now!FVCK CANCER
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post
Prevention is better than the cure. Irreversible damage could be caused.
Ban it now!
I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
I realised just how much I love this forum when Sally threatened to have it shut down.
Has he apologised for such selfish behaviour?
Surely that needs to be forthcoming before a 2nd chance is granted otherwise we're enabling this to potentially occur again.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bates View PostI realised just how much I love this forum when Sally threatened to have it shut down.
Has he apologised for such selfish behaviour?
Surely that needs to be forthcoming before a 2nd chance is granted otherwise we're enabling this to potentially occur again.
Why wait for the damage to be done?
Do lawyers eat chicken Kievs?FVCK CANCER
Comment
-
Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post
Exactly my point Batesey.
Why wait for the damage to be done?
Do lawyers eat chicken Kievs?I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.
- 1 like
Comment
-
I knew it was him from his first few posts. Blind freddy can see it.
Frankly, the guy threatened the whole existence of this place and should be banned immediately. He wanted to take legal precedings against admin and others on this site for petty things yet he continues to want to frequent on here.
Get rid of him before the nightmare becomes reality. It's only going to end badly for everyone.Exonerate the West Memphis Three - www.wm3.org
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bates View Post
4th chance perhaps as he's been banned 3 times.
Yet Gman (moderator) has already acknowledged its existence but seems happy to let it go. Check in the Sydney Roosters Discussion thread ‘Brandon Smith - charged with drug supply’ thread - quote #34. “A leopard never loses it spots”. It’s obvious who Gman is referring to but is happy to let him keep on posting numerous posts.
And Red (moderator) stated in the Off Topic Chat thread ‘Gone’ - quote #4. “Gone forever’.
And before anyone thinks this a pile on against King Salvo, it isn’t. He’s been banned three times so what does that say. As many have already mentioned and I’m happy to say I started this thread, ban King Salvo for the last time. If you, the moderators aren’t going to ban him after three bannings and several warnings, please explain why it is still here?
"Do you expect me to talk"? "No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die".
- 1 like
Comment
-
On the whole i didn't agree with much King Salvo had to say-especially when it came to domestic politics and the Middle East....however i thought his contributions were fair enough.
What did i miss about why he got banned? He never went overboard in any of the discussions in the threads that i would read/contribute to. I just thought he was wrong on a lot of stuff-which im sure he thought about me too! Thats ok
Comment
-
Originally posted by Random Rooster View PostOn the whole i didn't agree with much King Salvo had to say-especially when it came to domestic politics and the Middle East....however i thought his contributions were fair enough.
What did i miss about why he got banned? He never went overboard in any of the discussions in the threads that i would read/contribute to. I just thought he was wrong on a lot of stuff-which im sure he thought about me too! Thats ok
On further research, quote #9375 - it is still there."Do you expect me to talk"? "No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die".
Comment
-
Originally posted by Random Rooster View PostOn the whole i didn't agree with much King Salvo had to say-especially when it came to domestic politics and the Middle East....however i thought his contributions were fair enough.
What did i miss about why he got banned? He never went overboard in any of the discussions in the threads that i would read/contribute to. I just thought he was wrong on a lot of stuff-which im sure he thought about me too! Thats ok
KS posted a lot - average 6 posts a day. This meant it was easy to become familiar with his ideas, thoughts and style.
He liked to repeat himself a lot to reinforce his thoughts.
He liked to critique others thoughts that were different to him.
He could be condescending in tone, something which is easy to do in written form especially if you like to critique others a lot.
These things rubbed some posters the wrong way. But he’s not the only poster I’m sure that can be guilty of that.
On the other hand he was great at providing stats and great information and news from the club and players. Including from all grades. This I thought was a great contribution to this site and I really appreciated it.
Sone posters felt the need to constantly point out what they saw as his negatives in a combative way. KS was basically forced to either ignore it or return in kind.
The reason he was eventually banned was because he had a big meltdown one night and called the site and some posters anti Semitic after presumably he’d had enough of the constant hecklers.
I think in all posters should try and tolerate other posters difference more, or use the good old ignore function if they can’t. Though admittedly I’ve never used the ignore function myself.
- 2 likes
Comment
Comment