Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ban Michael Jones

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I never saw this so called post threatening to shut down the chookpen and sue some on here .I'm sure it probably wasn't called for but can guarantee there was provocation from the usual suspects .But I just wonder in all that was happening and with what he was saying did anyone of you happen to ask if he was ok and did he need a hand .I know the answer before you go off but gee the blokes a human and all the grubs referring bto him as it ECT are the ones that should be banned

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
      I never saw this so called post threatening to shut down the chookpen and sue some on here .I'm sure it probably wasn't called for but can guarantee there was provocation from the usual suspects .But I just wonder in all that was happening and with what he was saying did anyone of you happen to ask if he was ok and did he need a hand .I know the answer before you go off but gee the blokes a human and all the grubs referring bto him as it ECT are the ones that should be banned
      Not only have you contradicted yourself several times within the one post, but I also suggest you read as many as King Salvos posts as you can and you will finally have the answers to all your questions. It is all there in black and white. You don't have to take my word for it, it's all written right in front of your eyes; the name calling, cyber bullying, legal threats, derogatory, racist comments etc. No need for me to go on, it's up to yourself what you want to believe.

      "Do you expect me to talk"? "No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die".

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by 007 View Post

        Not only have you contradicted yourself several times within the one post, but I also suggest you read as many as King Salvos posts as you can and you will finally have the answers to all your questions. It is all there in black and white. You don't have to take my word for it, it's all written right in front of your eyes; the name calling, cyber bullying, legal threats, derogatory, racist comments etc. No need for me to go on, it's up to yourself what you want to believe.
        Contradicted myself How so? I have read many of salvos posts and he gets as much as he gives .

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
          I never saw this so called post threatening to shut down the chookpen and sue some on here .I'm sure it probably wasn't called for but can guarantee there was provocation from the usual suspects .But I just wonder in all that was happening and with what he was saying did anyone of you happen to ask if he was ok and did he need a hand .I know the answer before you go off but gee the blokes a human and all the grubs referring bto him as it ECT are the ones that should be banned
          So you haven’t read or seen what it was he was banned for yet you cast aspersions on people saying it was their fault without a shred of evidence to back your aspersions up.

          A little run down His meltdown began when a poster rehashed an old thread pointing out his hypocrisy about getting behind the team This had nothing to do with RT myself or Bates (apologies if we are not who you refer to as the usual suspects)

          The chicken Kiev meltdown was an attack on MR You know the one you had a go at me for having mutual banter with MR has since confirmed as us having a good relationship on here. Of course you said nothing about Sally attacking MR but jumped straight in to have a go at me when you wrongly thought I was doing so Showing you to be selective hypocritical snd bereft of good judgement

          Sally has pissed a lot more people off than the usual suspects you refer to

          Now I suggest you let the moderators do their job and stop questioning them and telling them who to ban You are being extremely disrespectful to all of them and their may very well be consequences for this type of disrespect

          I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post

            So you haven’t read or seen what it was he was banned for yet you cast aspersions on people saying it was their fault without a shred of evidence to back your aspersions up.

            A little run down His meltdown began when a poster rehashed an old thread pointing out his hypocrisy about getting behind the team This had nothing to do with RT myself or Bates (apologies if we are not who you refer to as the usual suspects)

            The chicken Kiev meltdown was an attack on MR You know the one you had a go at me for having mutual banter with MR has since confirmed as us having a good relationship on here. Of course you said nothing about Sally attacking MR but jumped straight in to have a go at me when you wrongly thought I was doing so Showing you to be selective hypocritical snd bereft of good judgement

            Sally has pissed a lot more people off than the usual suspects you refer to

            Now I suggest you let the moderators do their job and stop questioning them and telling them who to ban You are being extremely disrespectful to all of them and their may very well be consequences for this type of disrespect
            No I haven't seen the thread hence my comment.I do think but it is the people that are asking for him to be banned that are disrespecting the mods by not just letting them do there jobs and suggesting that they aren't .Salvo may have pissed of a lot of people but he has also assisted and added to a lot of people's pleasure on the site .Much the same could be said about you and the usual suspects i suppose .And if I had seen anybody having a crack at MR I would indeed speak up as I have done in the past with your or anyone else .

            Comment


            • #36
              I was mentioned by him as one of his potential targets for legal action lol in a post when he also threatened to take down the site...i just replied to someone who bumped a thread which brought up some old posts which totally contradicted his current stance......I did have a bit of a dig at him about it but it was pretty much banter, similar to the others who replied.

              The response from him the next morning was next level weirdness, threatening to bring down the site and threatening the posters (legal action) who replied to the post which was bumped.....lol

              I am a little meh about his return but if he got banned it would not worry me one bit.....
              Originally posted by Bondi Boy

              Pathetic!
              What a rabble we are.

              Oh well, maybe next year

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
                all the grubs referring bto him as it ECT are the ones that should be banned
                It deserved to be banned.
                By coming back and remaining , its just giving a middle finger to the moderators.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

                  No I haven't seen the thread hence my comment.I do think but it is the people that are asking for him to be banned that are disrespecting the mods by not just letting them do there jobs and suggesting that they aren't .Salvo may have pissed of a lot of people but he has also assisted and added to a lot of people's pleasure on the site .Much the same could be said about you and the usual suspects i suppose .And if I had seen anybody having a crack at MR I would indeed speak up as I have done in the past with your or anyone else .
                  Thanks 08. The entire thread, all 100 + pages of it has since been deleted because of it. He had explained the spelling change to me before but I forgot. The fact is, when you’re legally blind yo can’t see signs or labels in butcher shops or shop freezers from a distance. You rely more on looking at the product itself or bigger images on boxes. I grew up knowing it was spelt as Kiev and didn’t notice all the labelling had changed because I have very low vision. I didn’t need the lecture or being accused of being anti Ukraine which I’m definitely not. But despite this I have always given salvo a fair go here and got sick of the constant ‘Sally’ trolling which is why I spoke out about that and ended up copping some flack myself because of it.

                  Unfortunately there are others who don’t frequent the off topic section and are not the ‘usual suspects’. This was not related to any trolling but a situation whereby a poster discovered previous posts from Salvo where he was getting stuck into Robbo and the club, the same thing he bagged others for doing. Now it’s ok to change your views over time. Maybe salvo should have said that and pleaded his case but instead he went on an abusive rant. I couldn’t support him on that one. But overall I’d give him another chance as there are others on here who’ve been given multiple chances and I think salvo does add a lot of good stuff to this forum and I really don’t think he intentionally goes out of his way to upset or annoy anyone.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by mightyrooster View Post

                    Thanks 08. The entire thread, all 100 + pages of it has since been deleted because of it. He had explained the spelling change to me before but I forgot. The fact is, when you’re legally blind yo can’t see signs or labels in butcher shops or shop freezers from a distance. You rely more on looking at the product itself or bigger images on boxes. I grew up knowing it was spelt as Kiev and didn’t notice all the labelling had changed because I have very low vision. I didn’t need the lecture or being accused of being anti Ukraine which I’m definitely not. But despite this I have always given salvo a fair go here and got sick of the constant ‘Sally’ trolling which is why I spoke out about that and ended up copping some flack myself because of it.

                    Unfortunately there are others who don’t frequent the off topic section and are not the ‘usual suspects’. This was not related to any trolling but a situation whereby a poster discovered previous posts from Salvo where he was getting stuck into Robbo and the club, the same thing he bagged others for doing. Now it’s ok to change your views over time. Maybe salvo should have said that and pleaded his case but instead he went on an abusive rant. I couldn’t support him on that one. But overall I’d give him another chance as there are others on here who’ve been given multiple chances and I think salvo does add a lot of good stuff to this forum and I really don’t think he intentionally goes out of his way to upset or annoy anyone.
                    He’s shown he is a loose cannon and a danger to the sites longevity and as such I’d like to see the moderators get rid of him. Now before 08 gets his knickers in a knot I’m accepting the moderators decision one way or another.

                    I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by mightyrooster View Post

                      Thanks 08. The entire thread, all 100 + pages of it has since been deleted because of it. He had explained the spelling change to me before but I forgot. The fact is, when you’re legally blind yo can’t see signs or labels in butcher shops or shop freezers from a distance. You rely more on looking at the product itself or bigger images on boxes. I grew up knowing it was spelt as Kiev and didn’t notice all the labelling had changed because I have very low vision. I didn’t need the lecture or being accused of being anti Ukraine which I’m definitely not. But despite this I have always given salvo a fair go here and got sick of the constant ‘Sally’ trolling which is why I spoke out about that and ended up copping some flack myself because of it.

                      Unfortunately there are others who don’t frequent the off topic section and are not the ‘usual suspects’. This was not related to any trolling but a situation whereby a poster discovered previous posts from Salvo where he was getting stuck into Robbo and the club, the same thing he bagged others for doing. Now it’s ok to change your views over time. Maybe salvo should have said that and pleaded his case but instead he went on an abusive rant. I couldn’t support him on that one. But overall I’d give him another chance as there are others on here who’ve been given multiple chances and I think salvo does add a lot of good stuff to this forum and I really don’t think he intentionally goes out of his way to upset or annoy anyone.
                      And that's the thing isn't it MR .The sad state when so called grown-ups go back on threads to see if someone has said something contradictory in the past .Or feel the need to have a crap just for the sake of it like Aw has to me above.Je and his mate are relentless grubs .You will never convince me otherwise.Lol the kiev thing because I had never noticed the change myself

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        I’m retreating from this discussion. My contributions are fairly pointless really when all is said and done.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

                          Contradicted myself How so? I have read many of salvos posts and he gets as much as he gives .
                          If he gets as much as he gives How is anyone bullying harassing or doing anything wrong Are you saying he can give as much as he wants but others don’t have the right of reply

                          Bringing up old threads isn’t really my go but Sally made his bed there with his pious and holier than thou views against anyone critical of coach Robinson The thing is what you say here can be brought up at anytime and it’s on writing As someone else said he’s allowed to change his views But even coming back with that would still have shown him up IMHO His insane responses to it was his ego getting the better of him.
                          I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

                            And that's the thing isn't it MR .The sad state when so called grown-ups go back on threads to see if someone has said something contradictory in the past .Or feel the need to have a crap just for the sake of it like Aw has to me above.Je and his mate are relentless grubs .You will never convince me otherwise.Lol the kiev thing because I had never noticed the change myself
                            You're very judgemental of AW and Co yet you want to give Sally the serial offender who's been banned 3 times another chance. Strange!

                            The other odd thing is your selective memory that appears to let you down when it suits.

                            Me thinks you don't give two hoots about Sally. It's more to do with the axe you have to grind with AW.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by mightyrooster View Post
                              I’m retreating from this discussion. My contributions are fairly pointless really when all is said and done.
                              Think Switzerland.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Bates View Post

                                You're very judgemental of AW and Co yet you want to give Sally the serial offender who's been banned 3 times another chance. Strange!

                                The other odd thing is your selective memory that appears to let you down when it suits.

                                Me thinks you don't give two hoots about Sally. It's more to do with the axe you have to grind with AW.
                                Mate I have copped it from AW and co once too often but as per usual he would imagine he does no wrong.. In saying that if they were banned 3 times i would vote to give them another chance to. Everyone has a right to their view as do I

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X