Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ban Michael Jones

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

    Seems you may have slipped up in the past as well . Happy he has returned and hope some will not set him up for failure like in the past .
    By all means, back your comment up with references.
    "Do you expect me to talk"? "No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die".

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

      Happy he has returned and hope some will not set him up for failure like in the past .
      Blaming others for his demise is a victim mentality and lacks accountability. No matter what others say on here He like the rest of us are responsible for their own actions

      As I said he’s a wonderful not so new edition to this place. But he will slip up and be gone again and being a reformed character who continues to try and refine my behaviour I for one will not be querying our wonderful moderators on it should they see fit to get rid of him.
      Last edited by Andrew Walker; 09-22-2025, 09:53 PM.
      I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

        Seems you may have slipped up in the past as well . Happy he has returned and hope some will not set him up for failure like in the past .
        Set ‘him’ up for failure?!?

        There are two flaws in your post.

        1) No one has ever been set up by a chicken Kiev.

        2) You can’t use the term ‘him’. ‘It’ would have been better.

        Now before you start… the word ‘it’ is being respectful to Sally who clearly promoted the ‘it’ or they/them movement.
        FVCK CANCER

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by 007 View Post

          By all means, back your comment up with references.
          See posts above

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post

            Blaming others for his demise is a victim mentality and lacks accountability. No matter what others say on here He like the rest of us are responsible for their own actions

            As I said he’s a wonderful not so new edition to this place. But he will slip up and be gone again and being a reformed character who continues to try and refine my behaviour I for one will not be querying our wonderful moderators on it should they see fit to get rid of him.
            Prevention is better than the cure. Irreversible damage could be caused.

            Ban it now!
            FVCK CANCER

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post

              Prevention is better than the cure. Irreversible damage could be caused.

              Ban it now!
              OH RT !!!! I think it’s only a matter of time.


              I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

              Comment


              • #22
                I realised just how much I love this forum when Sally threatened to have it shut down.

                Has he apologised for such selfish behaviour?

                Surely that needs to be forthcoming before a 2nd chance is granted otherwise we're enabling this to potentially occur again.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Bates View Post
                  I realised just how much I love this forum when Sally threatened to have it shut down.

                  Has he apologised for such selfish behaviour?

                  Surely that needs to be forthcoming before a 2nd chance is granted otherwise we're enabling this to potentially occur again.
                  Exactly my point Batesey.

                  Why wait for the damage to be done?

                  Do lawyers eat chicken Kievs?
                  FVCK CANCER

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post

                    Exactly my point Batesey.

                    Why wait for the damage to be done?

                    Do lawyers eat chicken Kievs?
                    I’m sure they do I think they also issue cease and desist orders
                    I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I knew it was him from his first few posts. Blind freddy can see it.

                      Frankly, the guy threatened the whole existence of this place and should be banned immediately. He wanted to take legal precedings against admin and others on this site for petty things yet he continues to want to frequent on here.

                      Get rid of him before the nightmare becomes reality. It's only going to end badly for everyone.
                      Exonerate the West Memphis Three - www.wm3.org

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by caz View Post
                        like your work, james, but i'd vote for a second chance
                        4th chance perhaps as he's been banned 3 times.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Bates View Post

                          4th chance perhaps as he's been banned 3 times.
                          Absolutely spot on Bates. As I mentioned at the start of this thread, this is now his 4th chance - last banning was supposed to be permanent.

                          Yet Gman (moderator) has already acknowledged its existence but seems happy to let it go. Check in the Sydney Roosters Discussion thread ‘Brandon Smith - charged with drug supply’ thread - quote #34. “A leopard never loses it spots”. It’s obvious who Gman is referring to but is happy to let him keep on posting numerous posts.

                          And Red (moderator) stated in the Off Topic Chat thread ‘Gone’ - quote #4. “Gone forever’.

                          And before anyone thinks this a pile on against King Salvo, it isn’t. He’s been banned three times so what does that say. As many have already mentioned and I’m happy to say I started this thread, ban King Salvo for the last time. If you, the moderators aren’t going to ban him after three bannings and several warnings, please explain why it is still here?
                          "Do you expect me to talk"? "No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die".

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            On the whole i didn't agree with much King Salvo had to say-especially when it came to domestic politics and the Middle East....however i thought his contributions were fair enough.

                            What did i miss about why he got banned? He never went overboard in any of the discussions in the threads that i would read/contribute to. I just thought he was wrong on a lot of stuff-which im sure he thought about me too! Thats ok

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Random Rooster View Post
                              On the whole i didn't agree with much King Salvo had to say-especially when it came to domestic politics and the Middle East....however i thought his contributions were fair enough.

                              What did i miss about why he got banned? He never went overboard in any of the discussions in the threads that i would read/contribute to. I just thought he was wrong on a lot of stuff-which im sure he thought about me too! Thats ok
                              He posted a clip in the 'What happened to the songs in your era thread' where he stated the site (thechookpen) as anti-Semetic. I believe the post has now been deleted. I'm sure one of the moderators can vouch for this - maybe?

                              On further research, quote #9375 - it is still there.
                              Last edited by 7; 09-24-2025, 07:09 PM. Reason: Looked further back in the thread.
                              "Do you expect me to talk"? "No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die".

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Random Rooster View Post
                                On the whole i didn't agree with much King Salvo had to say-especially when it came to domestic politics and the Middle East....however i thought his contributions were fair enough.

                                What did i miss about why he got banned? He never went overboard in any of the discussions in the threads that i would read/contribute to. I just thought he was wrong on a lot of stuff-which im sure he thought about me too! Thats ok
                                It’s going to take a long essay for me to really explain my thoughts, so I’ll try dot points.

                                KS posted a lot - average 6 posts a day. This meant it was easy to become familiar with his ideas, thoughts and style.
                                He liked to repeat himself a lot to reinforce his thoughts.
                                He liked to critique others thoughts that were different to him.
                                He could be condescending in tone, something which is easy to do in written form especially if you like to critique others a lot.
                                These things rubbed some posters the wrong way. But he’s not the only poster I’m sure that can be guilty of that.
                                On the other hand he was great at providing stats and great information and news from the club and players. Including from all grades. This I thought was a great contribution to this site and I really appreciated it.

                                Sone posters felt the need to constantly point out what they saw as his negatives in a combative way. KS was basically forced to either ignore it or return in kind.
                                The reason he was eventually banned was because he had a big meltdown one night and called the site and some posters anti Semitic after presumably he’d had enough of the constant hecklers.

                                I think in all posters should try and tolerate other posters difference more, or use the good old ignore function if they can’t. Though admittedly I’ve never used the ignore function myself.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X