Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brian Smith at halftime in GF

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by player 1 View Post
    Roosters were rooted sideways and backwards by the refs all year, then in the decider the half time score was 14 nil roosters but for the blatant rorts by the officials.

    Just **** off.
    Even if it was 14-0 first half it was 0-26 second half. Maths not your strong point? Oh that's right, that was because of the longer half-time break arranged specifically for the Dragons. Lmao. The better team won, and the better (whiteboardless) coached team won.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by player 1 View Post
      You sound like a turd, 4 inch.

      The roosters also received the least penalties of any side this year. How does a coach fix that problem dickhead? How does Smith coach the side so that the referees pick up the other sides infringements and penalize them just as much as when they play teams other than the roosters?

      Roosters were rooted sideways and backwards by the refs all year, then in the decider the half time score was 14 nil roosters but for the blatant rorts by the officials.

      Just **** off.
      Well said man. I like your style.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by four-inch-cock View Post
        Even if it was 14-0 first half it was 0-26 second half. Maths not your strong point? Oh that's right, that was because of the longer half-time break arranged specifically for the Dragons. Lmao. The better team won, and the better (whiteboardless) coached team won.
        I think you are a 40 year old virgin.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by four-inch-cock View Post
          Even if it was 14-0 first half it was 0-26 second half. Maths not your strong point? Oh that's right, that was because of the longer half-time break arranged specifically for the Dragons. Lmao. The better team won, and the better (whiteboardless) coached team won.
          This guy is closer to being Phil Rothfield than Tries Off Kicks.

          a) he has a 4 inch cock
          b) he's an arrogant turd
          c) he has a totally irrational hatred of B. Smith
          d) he has a 4 inch cock
          e) i bet if we saw a pic of him we'd have trouble distinguishing his features as compared to a baboon's arse.

          Ergo,


          The tinge of red around Phil's cheeks (and quite possibly the baboon too) are a sure sign of alcoholism. He'll be a "tomato-nose" when he hits 50. Have another bourbon, Phil.

          Comment


          • #20
            OVP,

            Proves the age old adage that the truth hurts. But having a well developed sense of humour, I did get a chuckle out of your post. Let me address your finer points;

            a) he has a 4 inch cock

            As that great song goes "It ain't what you dance it's the way you dance it"

            b) he's an arrogant turd

            Maybe, but I'm the greatest arrogant turd.

            c) he has a totally irrational hatred of B. Smith

            I don't hate him. I feel sorry for him. How many times has he been GF runner up now? If he stays on as coach the name of this place will become "The Chokepen".

            d) he has a 4 inch cock

            "It ain't what you move but the way you move it"

            e) i bet if we saw a pic of him we'd have trouble distinguishing his features as compared to a baboon's arse.

            Some baboon's arse's are quite attractive. But comparing my looks to Rothfield is pretty damn insulting.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by four-inch-cock View Post
              The point being you can have all the fancy tactics/plays/analysis you like but if you continually give away dumb penalties it counts for nothing. It should have been addressed and fixed early in the season when the problem became apparent.
              Counts for nothing in what way... we went from wooden spooners to Grand Finalists. Am I missing something here?

              In 2009 we received the least penalties of any team per game and in 2010 we received the least penalties of any team per game again. How exactly does one fix that?

              And here's a fun stat for you per game we actually didn't give away the most penalties this year we were 4th but we somehow managed to win less penalty counts than any other team. Discipline ay

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post
                In 2009 we received the least penalties of any team per game and in 2010 we received the least penalties of any team per game again. How exactly does one fix that?
                Ummm....pretty easy actually. If you improve your discipline to match that of other teams then that stat improves. It's not rocket science.

                Blaming it on conspiracies and living in a forlorn hope that an Independent Commision is going fix it is a fool's paradise.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by four-inch-cock View Post
                  Ummm....pretty easy actually. If you improve your discipline to match that of other teams then that stat improves. It's not rocket science.

                  Blaming it on conspiracies and living in a forlorn hope that an Independent Commision is going fix it is a fool's paradise.
                  Even though its evident you are a shit-stirring troll, I'll entertain this idiotic post with a response.

                  How many penalties you concede has nothing to do with how many penalties you are awarded. This argument has been thrashed out before - see this thread - and it is clear that the Roosters do not receive their fair share of penalties.
                  FONK

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by four-inch-cock View Post
                    Ummm....pretty easy actually. If you improve your discipline to match that of other teams then that stat improves. It's not rocket science.

                    Blaming it on conspiracies and living in a forlorn hope that an Independent Commision is going fix it is a fool's paradise.
                    Obviously it is rocket science for some... our discipline has nothing to do with how many penalties we receive. That's the discipline of other teams. Derrrp

                    Although feel free to find one post of mine where I suggested a conspiracy theory, I was just proving your 'facts' wrong which you seem to have not addressed... I wonder why?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by four-inch-cock View Post
                      Ummm....pretty easy actually. If you improve your discipline to match that of other teams then that stat improves. It's not rocket science.
                      I can't figure out whether you have a four inch cock growing out of your forehead or a four inch cock up your arse.

                      Did you even read what Rooster 6 wrote?

                      Penalties RECEIVED - dopey troll.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I think I'm in some sort of twilight zone.

                        If you recieve less penalties than other teams it means those other teams have committed less penalties. You can't have recieved penalty stats without someone committing those penalties. Of course teams with bad records of committing penalties are going to figure negatively in the recieved penalty stats. It's just simple maths.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by four-inch-cock View Post
                          If you recieve less penalties than other teams it means those other teams have committed less penalties. You can't have recieved penalty stats without someone committing those penalties. Of course teams with bad records of committing penalties are going to figure negatively in the recieved penalty stats. It's just simple maths.
                          You are truly as thick as pig shit.

                          Its going to be a long, long off season if this is the standard of trolling.
                          FONK

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by redwhiteandbluester View Post
                            You are truly as thick as pig shit.

                            Its going to be a long, long off season if this is the standard of trolling.
                            And he called my appreciation of logic and maths into question?

                            Ha ha, and he still doesn't get it?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by player 1 View Post
                              And he called my appreciation of logic and maths into question?
                              And you can add to that list absolutely no idea about statistics.

                              But I can't explain it more simply....try taking in the whole instead of grasping one stat off one team in isolation.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                boring
                                barbarian ......arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh!!!!!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X