When will these blokes choose Pepsi

[Batemans Bay Rooster]

Yep... it's easy to say it's harmless until you meet somebody who's now been scheduled into a mental health facility (for life) because it made them permanently lose mental capacity.

We've just about stamped out nicotine addiction. Why the flipping hell would we wanna bow down to the tobacco companies and allow them to profit from THC addiction? Make no mistake, tobacco companies own all the big weed facilities in US states that have legalised it.

I mean WTF. Why are people THAT stupid that they'd let big tobacco introduce THC addiction as a 'safer alternative'. Fark that. It'll take 30-50 years but when regular users all start getting schizophrenia/dementia from THC addiction. Then they'll all go crying that they 'didn't know', I'll be paying for their healthcare through my taxes and big tobacco will magically go into hiding when it comes to compensating people.

FWIW I know people who work for marketing in big tobacco. Can very much confirm that they invest billions into marketing THC as a safe drug (it's their new product because nicotine's no longer cool, and there's now a massive amount of scientific research providing exactly how it's linked with death & suffering). I'm not waiting 'till studies come out showing what we already know about THC (i.e. that THC addiction is massively over-represented in mental health facilities, it's got more tar than tobacco and it performs worse than placebos in pain relief studies).

Nicotine and asbestos were known to be dangerous for centuries, just like how we know that large percentages of people in mental health facilities are heavy THC users. Surely we've learned from past lessons? Human bodies are harmed by inhaling noxious gasses... whether this be smoke, chemical-filled vapour or dust particles. Lungs are built to inhale fresh air and there's enough shyte in the air without intentionally adding more shyte to it.

So stupid a response as to be almost unable to be responded to.

Open your brain you flip. People will still smoke pot, lots and lots or people, regardless of your suggestions that they shouldn't. You crap on about the negative effects - wake up you fool, they will smoke it anyway. Just like cigarettes. We might as well take the tax money, instead of just letting it go to the crims and the bikies and the dealers. Think of all the things that could be paid for from the tax revenue. How bad asbestos is blah blah farkin blah is farkin irrelevant. How can you be so dumb

[Rooster1908]

So stupid a response as to be almost unable to be responded to.

Open your brain you flip. People will still smoke pot, lots and lots or people, regardless of your suggestions that they shouldn't. You crap on about the negative effects - wake up you fool, they will smoke it anyway. Just like cigarettes. We might as well take the tax money, instead of just letting it go to the crims and the bikies and the dealers. Think of all the things that could be paid for from the tax revenue. How bad asbestos is blah blah farkin blah is farkin irrelevant. How can you be so dumb

Why do you have to attack and insult just because someone doesn't agree with your radical idea.You may well believe in what your saying but if you want to be honest with yourself you know the government and at least the majority of the population would disagree with you .

[Recky62]

So this video with the stormys having a alledged toot …I heard there are two weeks suspensions for the numbnuts ?…..didn’t Wendell sailor get two years for something similar….you’ll be getting gift cards for murder shortly

[ism22]

So stupid a response as to be almost unable to be responded to.

Open your brain you flip. People will still smoke pot, lots and lots or people, regardless of your suggestions that they shouldn't. You crap on about the negative effects - wake up you fool, they will smoke it anyway. Just like cigarettes. We might as well take the tax money, instead of just letting it go to the crims and the bikies and the dealers. Think of all the things that could be paid for from the tax revenue. How bad asbestos is blah blah farkin blah is farkin irrelevant. How can you be so dumb

Yep anybody who opposes drugs + doesn't want them anywhere near their children is stupid and closed-minded. Gotcha.

[ism22]

So this video with the stormys having a alledged toot …I heard there are two weeks suspensions for the numbnuts ?…..didn’t Wendell sailor get two years for something similar….you’ll be getting gift cards for murder shortly

Yeah I think one positive result basically ended his yawnion career? Andrew Walker's NRL career (while at Manly) was basically ended by the same thing, right? Interesting how you now get 5 weeks for an accidental high tackle, but vlandarse will basically say 'I will let you off if you share it with me' for breaking the law & associating with drug dealers.

[mattyh]

Yep... it's easy to say it's harmless until you meet somebody who's now been scheduled into a mental health facility (for life) because it made them permanently lose mental capacity.

We've just about stamped out nicotine addiction. Why the flipping hell would we wanna bow down to the tobacco companies and allow them to profit from THC addiction? Make no mistake, tobacco companies own all the big weed facilities in US states that have legalised it.

I mean WTF. Why are people THAT stupid that they'd let big tobacco introduce THC addiction as a 'safer alternative'. Fark that. It'll take 30-50 years but when regular users all start getting schizophrenia/dementia from THC addiction. Then they'll all go crying that they 'didn't know', I'll be paying for their healthcare through my taxes and big tobacco will magically go into hiding when it comes to compensating people.

FWIW I know people who work for marketing in big tobacco. Can very much confirm that they invest billions into marketing THC as a safe drug (it's their new product because nicotine's no longer cool, and there's now a massive amount of scientific research providing exactly how it's linked with death & suffering). I'm not waiting 'till studies come out showing what we already know about THC (i.e. that THC addiction is massively over-represented in mental health facilities, it's got more tar than tobacco and it performs worse than placebos in pain relief studies).

Nicotine and asbestos were known to be dangerous for centuries, just like how we know that large percentages of people in mental health facilities are heavy THC users. Surely we've learned from past lessons? Human bodies are harmed by inhaling noxious gasses... whether this be smoke, chemical-filled vapour or dust particles. Lungs are built to inhale fresh air and there's enough shyte in the air without intentionally adding more shyte to it.

couldnt agree more.

[ChookMaster]

Yep... it's easy to say it's harmless until you meet somebody who's now been scheduled into a mental health facility (for life) because it made them permanently lose mental capacity.

We've just about stamped out nicotine addiction. Why the flipping hell would we wanna bow down to the tobacco companies and allow them to profit from THC addiction? Make no mistake, tobacco companies own all the big weed facilities in US states that have legalised it.

I mean WTF. Why are people THAT stupid that they'd let big tobacco introduce THC addiction as a 'safer alternative'. Fark that. It'll take 30-50 years but when regular users all start getting schizophrenia/dementia from THC addiction. Then they'll all go crying that they 'didn't know', I'll be paying for their healthcare through my taxes and big tobacco will magically go into hiding when it comes to compensating people.

FWIW I know people who work for marketing in big tobacco. Can very much confirm that they invest billions into marketing THC as a safe drug (it's their new product because nicotine's no longer cool, and there's now a massive amount of scientific research providing exactly how it's linked with death & suffering). I'm not waiting 'till studies come out showing what we already know about THC (i.e. that THC addiction is massively over-represented in mental health facilities, it's got more tar than tobacco and it performs worse than placebos in pain relief studies).

Nicotine and asbestos were known to be dangerous for centuries, just like how we know that large percentages of people in mental health facilities are heavy THC users. Surely we've learned from past lessons? Human bodies are harmed by inhaling noxious gasses... whether this be smoke, chemical-filled vapour or dust particles. Lungs are built to inhale fresh air and there's enough shyte in the air without intentionally adding more shyte to it.

Yeah awesome well thought out post…. On a footy forum hahaha smh mate if you are this bothered go and post this sort of crap where it matters.. I don’t come onto a roosters forum to be lectured about drugs.

[ChookMaster]

Yep... it's easy to say it's harmless until you meet somebody who's now been scheduled into a mental health facility (for life) because it made them permanently lose mental capacity.

We've just about stamped out nicotine addiction. Why the flipping hell would we wanna bow down to the tobacco companies and allow them to profit from THC addiction? Make no mistake, tobacco companies own all the big weed facilities in US states that have legalised it.

I mean WTF. Why are people THAT stupid that they'd let big tobacco introduce THC addiction as a 'safer alternative'. Fark that. It'll take 30-50 years but when regular users all start getting schizophrenia/dementia from THC addiction. Then they'll all go crying that they 'didn't know', I'll be paying for their healthcare through my taxes and big tobacco will magically go into hiding when it comes to compensating people.

FWIW I know people who work for marketing in big tobacco. Can very much confirm that they invest billions into marketing THC as a safe drug (it's their new product because nicotine's no longer cool, and there's now a massive amount of scientific research providing exactly how it's linked with death & suffering). I'm not waiting 'till studies come out showing what we already know about THC (i.e. that THC addiction is massively over-represented in mental health facilities, it's got more tar than tobacco and it performs worse than placebos in pain relief studies).

Nicotine and asbestos were known to be dangerous for centuries, just like how we know that large percentages of people in mental health facilities are heavy THC users. Surely we've learned from past lessons? Human bodies are harmed by inhaling noxious gasses... whether this be smoke, chemical-filled vapour or dust particles. Lungs are built to inhale fresh air and there's enough shyte in the air without intentionally adding more shyte to it.

It’ll be easy clippings for you on here mate because like I mentioned after all you are talking to a bunch of die hard roosters fans. End of story. I understand your points I’m not saying if you’re right or wrong in my eyes I just don’t really see the point in all this fuss when it’s a footy forum lmao. I’m sure there are plenty of opportunities and openings for you to discuss this sort of stuff with people who study things like Cannabis and so forth. I would consider talking to these guys about it.

[ChookMaster]

Yep anybody who opposes drugs + doesn't want them anywhere near their children is stupid and closed-minded. Gotcha.

How was your bloke in a bar case by the way mate? Wasn’t alcohol once outlawed in the states? So by your logic, alcohol should be a touchy subject as well I suspect.

[Rooster1908]

Die hard Roosters fans can have opinions on things other than footy you know .If you know what the post is about and don't want to consider yourself being lectured then there are options for you .

[Bondicigar]

Die hard Roosters fans can have opinions on things other than footy you know .If you know what the post is about and don't want to consider yourself being lectured then there are options for you .

Ok you win
who are you backing today?
Penrith 13 souths 0

[ChookMaster]

Ok you win
who are you backing today?
Penrith 13 souths 0

Wouldn’t it be great to see souffs kept to zero in the GF today.

[ChookMaster]

Die hard Roosters fans can have opinions on things other than footy you know .If you know what the post is about and don't want to consider yourself being lectured then there are options for you .

Of course i agree with that although when it comes to something as sensitive and deep as drugs it can be a topic that can turn nasty real quick. If I was to start a thread about the bunnies today I’m sure I would be met with staunch supporters telling me to go elsewhere so why can’t the same standard be met?

[Rooster1908]

Of course i agree with that although when it comes to something as sensitive and deep as drugs it can be a topic that can turn nasty real quick. If I was to start a thread about the bunnies today I’m sure I would be met with staunch supporters telling me to go elsewhere so why can’t the same standard be met?

I think you know why , one matters and the other ones , well they don't

[ChookMaster]

I think you know why , one matters and the other ones , well they don't

Hahaha true… very true