Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roosters labelled a club out of control

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by sirgamble View Post
    "an assault/battery is committed when one person 1) tries to or does physically strike another, or 2) acts in a threatening manner to put another in fear of immediate harm."

    So... an assault was committed because 1 person physically struck another. It doesn't matter what she did... if he physically struck her then he has committed assault/battery.

    I think forensics quite clearly show that a woman was punched, and will probably link the punch to Jake Friend's fist, if that is the case, then legally it is an assault. Sorry, but that's the definition... if you accidentally walk into a guy, push him over and he falls to his death down a bottomless pit then you still assaulted him. It will be up to the lawyers/police to argue over how serious this particular assault was. I just thought I'd clear up that definition... assault is making contact with somebody, or threatening to do so... if you tell your mate in jest "haha **** off you ****, I'll smash you if you do that again..." and he's threatened then it's assault... sure, it'll go nowhere in court, I just thought I'd make it clear that we're dealing with an assault in this situation. Somebody was punched! Who, what, when, where, how, why...etc? The legal guru's will decide, however it's quite clear that a woman was assaulted by definition.

    Actually the fact that 2 big blokes were fighting in a club is committing an assault towards those around them by definition because it's behaving in a threatening manner, and putting people in fear! WTF were 2 Roosters having a fight? That's the question we need to be asking!!!! WTF were they fighting!!!! Not "Why did she interfere?"

    These are guys on 6 figure salaries who are idols within the community. They should know better than to fight in public! The fact that a girl got hurt just makes the situation worse...

    ---

    My hope!! My BIG hope is that it was all Nick Bradley's fault! That HE threatened Friend or something... then Earl jumped in and tried to rip Bradley off Friend... then Bradley's sister jumped into that brawl and was accidentally punched...

    Then they're probably off pretty well scott-free. Still shouldn't have been fighting, but means Earl wasn't really fighting (was acting in defence of Friend) and Friend was also acting in self defence as Bradley attacked him... and the sister... well she just got in the way, and the guys had no intention of harming her... still, she was assaulted and felt scared... and 3 big guys shouldn't have done that to her! Nick Bradley needs more of a mention in this one rather than some innocent little angel I think. What was Nick Bradley doing? I think it's far more likely he was arguing with Friend and did some dodgy stuff...
    I thought we were taliking about Friend and Earl.....because niether of these kids are on anything that resembles a 6 figure income....and most people would be hard pressed to know who either of them were if they passed them in the street, so you idol theory just went out the window also...

    And one last thing.....who died and made you admin??.....because last time I checked just because you cant see another point of view, doesnt mean we have to have a thread locked......

    Fair dinkum, not sure who you newbies think you are......

    Comment


    • #32
      Having read through this thread,sirgamble you are an idiot
      I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by phantom View Post
        I thought we were taliking about Friend and Earl.....because niether of these kids are on anything that resembles a 6 figure income....and most people would be hard pressed to know who either of them were if they passed them in the street, so you idol theory just went out the window also...

        And one last thing.....who died and made you admin??.....because last time I checked just because you cant see another point of view, doesnt mean we have to have a thread locked......

        Fair dinkum, not sure who you newbies think you are......
        Sticks and stones... you're not worth the energy.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
          Having read through this thread,sirgamble you are an idiot
          Sticks and stones...

          Comment


          • #35
            Stick to your sticks and stones line. I like it. Its far better than reading the other rubbish you have written.
            I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

            Comment


            • #36
              Well as a ' newbie' to this board I agree to a certain extent of what sirgamble is trying to stay.

              I am sick and tired of these clowns going out on the pish when our mighty club is close to getting its first spoon since 1966. These young men are priviledged to play for the club and this priviledge now requires certain behaviors, should they not wish to abide within these well they can go play park football.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by sirgamble View Post
                Sticks and stones...

                A high school teacher huh? I hope you are not a public school high teacher. All this time to get on to a forum while you are supposed to be teaching...well a class maybe?

                Sticks and stones??? You must teach modern literature.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Well Hungarian View Post
                  Well as a ' newbie' to this board I agree to a certain extent of what sirgamble is trying to stay.

                  I am sick and tired of these clowns going out on the pish when our mighty club is close to getting its first spoon since 1966. These young men are priviledged to play for the club and this priviledge now requires certain behaviors, should they not wish to abide within these well they can go play park football.

                  Can you list these behaviours and then send them on to the club so they know what you expect. The apply those same rules to yourself.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by JohnL View Post
                    Can you list these behaviours and then send them on to the club so they know what you expect. The apply those same rules to yourself.
                    I will stay out of these discussions, but from bitter experience my counsel to you all is keep your powder dry until you know the facts. Let me assure you that you won't know what happened until it's either in court (well, sort of) or you get to speak to someone who was involved.

                    Until then, I don't see the point in jumping to conclusions and turning your guns on each other.

                    The media will only print what they think will get you to buy (or watch) the next edition. They have no interest in the facts.
                    Last edited by Imadog; 07-01-2009, 01:45 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Well Hungarian View Post
                      Well as a ' newbie' to this board I agree to a certain extent of what sirgamble is trying to stay.

                      I am sick and tired of these clowns going out on the pish when our mighty club is close to getting its first spoon since 1966. These young men are priviledged to play for the club and this priviledge now requires certain behaviors, should they not wish to abide within these well they can go play park football.
                      Well I dont hear you calling for all the Queensland SOO players to be sacked.They are at the elite level of their sport and earnt the privilege to represent their whole state,yet they all went out on the piss after game 2 this year until sunrise.They too are not abiding by YOUR rules,so why your silence here? Does YOUR rule only apply to teams close to the spoon?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Were our boys even drunk that night?

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Kramer86 View Post
                          Were our boys even drunk that night?
                          I guess we will have to wait to hear back from those that have the facts because they were there on the night. That would be the best way to get the facts.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by spanner View Post
                            Well I dont hear you calling for all the Queensland SOO players to be sacked.They are at the elite level of their sport and earnt the privilege to represent their whole state,yet they all went out on the piss after game 2 this year until sunrise.They too are not abiding by YOUR rules,so why your silence here? Does YOUR rule only apply to teams close to the spoon?
                            .

                            I couldnt give a shite if QLD went out , I only care for this club and the image of it being tarnished again.

                            I would have thought for a club coming last and with their coach in the international news for being blind 36 hours before a game some common sense would take place and the players would stay in and keep put of trouble - whether it be their fault or not.

                            They arent my rules I love a bender as much as anyone but me going out doesnt put my club on the front page again for all the wrong reasons.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by sirgamble View Post
                              Sticks and stones...

                              Mate I'm a high school teacher. If I were charged with assault I would temporarily be suspended from duties pending investigation. That's the rules! And let me tell you... I'm not getting paid anywhere near a 6 figure salary in order to be expected to uphold the rules of society and be a good role model in the community...

                              What exactly IS your point..


                              I'm sure i'm not the only one confused by the tripe you write..

                              You SEEM to be saying footy players should have to live their lives by a different set of rules to the rest of us...Just because they earn better money..

                              Hypocracy of the highest order..

                              Then again your babble is always very confusing..
                              Last edited by Horrie Is God; 07-01-2009, 06:26 PM. Reason: complete confusion over what sirgoose's point is

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Horrie Is God View Post
                                What exactly IS your point..


                                I'm sure i'm not the only one confused by the tripe you write..

                                You SEEM to be saying footy players should have to live their lives by a different set of rules to the rest of us...Just because they earn better money..

                                Hypocracy of the highest order..

                                Then again your babble is always very confusing..
                                It may not seem fair but that is the reality of the situation..
                                ...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X