Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jake friend needs to go NOW!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by King Salvo View Post

    Radley was playing second row though - not sure your comparing apples with apples in comparing both - Radley did well but so did Jake in what one would say a very dysfunctional performance - so much to work on and so little time to get it right - Apparently all the work they did in the 11 day break didn't play out in that performance - Big test next game vs Warriors in NZ
    You can leave Radley out of it if you like, my point is friends main weapon over the years is becoming as ineffective as his service.

    Baptise didn't set the world on fire but was no worse.

    Comment


    • #17
      Yes - and the sooner the better, otherwise we.will continue to play with one hand tied behind our back.

      Comment


      • #18
        Friend deserves his place and gives 100% each game no matter what good bad and the ugly -pity others don't though - Cronk and Tedesco didn't contribute much today and both on far greater money than most in the team - be number 1 and 2 on payments but neither are showing it in their respective performances so far in 9 rounds - Tedesco may get the NSW SOO FB spot as Turbo had an even worse game that he did - not looking good for NSW one has to say - Dragons could get 6 in the NSW SOO side

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by King Salvo View Post
          Friend deserves his place and gives 100% each game no matter what good bad and the ugly -pity others don't though - Cronk and Tedesco didn't contribute much today and both on far greater money than most in the team - be number 1 and 2 on payments but neither are showing it in their respective performances so far in 9 rounds - Tedesco may get the NSW SOO FB spot as Turbo had an even worse game that he did - not looking good for NSW one has to say - Dragons could get 6 in the NSW SOO side
          Good, let St Merge get as many as they like in the SOO side.
          Can you NOT see that Friend’s primary role as a hooker in attack (like any other Hooker) is to give good, decisive service and he fails to do that more often than not?
          I understand your loyalty but it’s blinding.

          Comment


          • #20
            It's not just his poor service from dummy half that is an issue. The opposition forwards continually run at him because he gets pushed backwards which means we have no line speed in defence as we are on the back door. Every commentator in the game is mentioning his deficiencies yet Robbo refuses to acknowledge that Friend is a major problem.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by King Salvo View Post
              Not quite sure what game you were watching but Baptiste offered zilch from dummy half - His first game I understand but those on here wanting him to be the main man at DH would have/should have second thoughts about that for sure and certain.
              The funny thing is he did exactly the same stuff as Friend; shuffle two-step then pass yet he is praised to the high heavens and our play makers were still crap with him on the field.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by King Salvo View Post
                Not quite sure what game you were watching but Baptiste offered zilch from dummy half - His first game I understand but those on here wanting him to be the main man at DH would have/should have second thoughts about that for sure and certain.
                Never said he set the world on fire
                just noticed how he didn’t throw lollie pops out of dummy half

                Baptise isn’t a starter, he is a good sub

                Comment


                • #23
                  Not sure Baptiste is really the answer he looked pretty pedestrian not really any better than friend and to tell the truth in those dying minutes I was glad that friend came back on.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    This continuing defence of Friend is laughable. Yes his service was quicker today but no more precise. He absolutely KILLED our momentum with that horrible hospital pass to Cronk. Ffs what other number 9 passes end to end like that? FIRST GRADER. My. Arse !

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by liver1971 View Post
                      This continuing defence of Friend is laughable. Yes his service was quicker today but no more precise. He absolutely KILLED our momentum with that horrible hospital pass to Cronk. Ffs what other number 9 passes end to end like that? FIRST GRADER. My. Arse !
                      Did you watch that passage of play at all? Victor Radley continued his run right in the path of Friend, what was he supposed to do pass it at Radley's head or hold on to the ball and get tackled? That delay caused Walker to be in Cronk's face as the ball arrived because Friend hesitates and attempts to pass it in front of him so if Radley doesn't get in the way then Friend can easily get off a pass to Cronk in time.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by milanja View Post
                        Friend close to best on ground.
                        Hahahahahaha thank you I needed a laugh after watching that game

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by RoosterFanNZ View Post
                          got much better attack with baptiste on
                          your right mate we did look crisper in attack with baptise at dummy

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by 200 IQ View Post

                            Did you watch that passage of play at all? Victor Radley continued his run right in the path of Friend, what was he supposed to do pass it at Radley's head or hold on to the ball and get tackled? That delay caused Walker to be in Cronk's face as the ball arrived because Friend hesitates and attempts to pass it in front of him so if Radley doesn't get in the way then Friend can easily get off a pass to Cronk in time.
                            So don’t pass.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by 200 IQ View Post

                              Did you watch that passage of play at all? Victor Radley continued his run right in the path of Friend, what was he supposed to do pass it at Radley's head or hold on to the ball and get tackled? That delay caused Walker to be in Cronk's face as the ball arrived because Friend hesitates and attempts to pass it in front of him so if Radley doesn't get in the way then Friend can easily get off a pass to Cronk in time.
                              Hes a first grade hooker,you dont throw shit passes like that what you do is take the tackle and go to ground you dont throw hospital passes to teammates,it makes you really unpopular with the recipient of the pass in the sheds.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by 200 IQ View Post

                                Did you watch that passage of play at all? Victor Radley continued his run right in the path of Friend, what was he supposed to do pass it at Radley's head or hold on to the ball and get tackled? That delay caused Walker to be in Cronk's face as the ball arrived because Friend hesitates and attempts to pass it in front of him so if Radley doesn't get in the way then Friend can easily get off a pass to Cronk in time.
                                Actually i did watch that passage of play , hence why i commented on it. I dont get in the habit of giving my 2 cents worth on play that i dont see He had the option to release it earlier and as per usual he held on too long,then chose the wrong option. Thinking on the run isnt Friends strong suit and i think you just confirmed that with your statement. What was he suppose to do? Simply chose an option that doesnt nearly cost us the game. Walker didnt knock it on.It was a lucky call that went our way. Most probably he would have went all the way. So my question to you is. Would you still be defending Friend if that happened. What was he suppose to do you say. Haha
                                Last edited by liver1971; 05-06-2018, 09:15 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X