Originally posted by Lydon
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ramblings from last night with a sleep to process and calm down
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by Johnny Tobin; 04-02-2018, 04:01 PM.
- 1 like
-
Props jobs are to run hard and aggressively up the middle, bending the line and then get a quick play the ball...
In defence, it is to tackle hard and smash the other teams props without giving away too many penalties.
It really does not have much to do with the creativity of the dummy-half as long as the service is reasonable..
Friend has been rubbish but you are drawing a long bow to blame our pussy props form on Jake Friend...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pass the Ball View PostProps jobs are to run hard and aggressively up the middle, bending the line and then get a quick play the ball...
In defence, it is to tackle hard and smash the other teams props without giving away too many penalties.
It really does not have much to do with the creativity of the dummy-half as long as the service is reasonable..
Friend has been rubbish but you are drawing a long bow to blame our pussy props form on Jake Friend...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post
People bag our props but their problems stem from the lack of creativity or variety at dummy half. If they know 100% what’s going to happen it’s not too hard to stop our go forward. I think the props are unfairly criticised.
Though I’m not a fan of Friend that can hardly be the blame for Napa’s sideways ineffective hit ups and JWH sluggish runs atm
The fire in the belly has disappeared and the whole teams play is being affected
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lydon View PostSorry JT but I disagree..
Though I’m not a fan of Friend that can hardly be the blame for Napa’s sideways ineffective hit ups and JWH sluggish runs atm
The fire in the belly has disappeared and the whole teams play is being affected
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jacks Fur Coat View Post
Geez mate I must disagree with you here.
Matto and Tetevano were probably our two best against the Warriors ...plus Fergo.
Dont get some of the Matto dislike on here....bends the line, hits hard...more than our other forwards do. Making a good transition from the backs imho.
Has the skills to ball play too...but as Brain said elsewhere needs a decent forwards coach, and or the licence and supports to use it.
Making Steve Naughton look like Vince Mellars...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jacks Fur Coat View Post
Geez mate I must disagree with you here.
Matto and Tetevano were probably our two best against the Warriors ...plus Fergo.
Dont get some of the Matto dislike on here....bends the line, hits hard...more than our other forwards do. Making a good transition from the backs imho.
Has the skills to ball play too...but as Brain said elsewhere needs a decent forwards coach, and or the licence and supports to use it.
This is a major part of being a good defender.
Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pass the Ball View PostProps jobs are to run hard and aggressively up the middle, bending the line and then get a quick play the ball...
In defence, it is to tackle hard and smash the other teams props without giving away too many penalties.
It really does not have much to do with the creativity of the dummy-half as long as the service is reasonable..
Friend has been rubbish but you are drawing a long bow to blame our pussy props form on Jake Friend..., even if he hasn't delivered the pass. Not saying Friend hasn't got his flaws, but it's not only him.
One thing I did see last night in the Saints v Knights game is Pearce putting up a torpedo bomb which had the saints fullback all worried. I wondered why he never did anything like that in the past 10 years.Last edited by ROC181; 04-02-2018, 07:21 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lydon View PostI have been looking very closely R6 and respectfully disagree with you..
You obviously think otherwise and that is fine,but I think you’re wrong!
Their carries have been strong, they're hitting hard in defence and we're not leaking much up the middle.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post
What is it that you're not seeing?
Their carries have been strong, they're hitting hard in defence and we're not leaking much up the middle.
Even SST has lost his impact playing in the front row,he was so damaging last year in the back row.
Defensively I have no issue with these guys,it’s more impact with the ball.
This week will be a test against a tough no nonsense forward pack,it will be interesting to see how they go!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post
People bag our props but their problems stem from the lack of creativity or variety at dummy half. If they know 100% what’s going to happen it’s not too hard to stop our go forward. I think the props are unfairly criticised.
Bound to happen when the % of forward passes from dummy half are increasing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lydon View PostI don’t think Napa’s carries are strong at all,as for JWH he has nowhere near the impact he once had!
Even SST has lost his impact playing in the front row,he was so damaging last year in the back row.
Defensively I have no issue with these guys,it’s more impact with the ball.
This week will be a test against a tough no nonsense forward pack,it will be interesting to see how they go!
As for SST I made this point when people first advocated for his switch into the front row, of course he's going to be less effective taking play 1 and play 2 carries as opposed to the usual play 3, play 4 carries. You're running into a set defensive line usually on the back of a slow play the ball or a set restart off a tap. We need to measure his performances differently now, he's done a good job taking the hard early carries, it's an ugly job but he's done it effectively IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post
I couldn't disagree regarding Napa more, I would've agreed with you last year but his carries have been very strong. He looks primed for a huge season, I hate to harp on this point but we just haven't allowed him to get into the game because I thought he was brilliant given his limited opportunities in the first half against the Warriors. Here's an interesting stat to ponder on, from the first 4 rounds only only 6 prop forwards average more metres per run than Dylan Napa.
As for SST I made this point when people first advocated for his switch into the front row, of course he's going to be less effective taking play 1 and play 2 carries as opposed to the usual play 3, play 4 carries. You're running into a set defensive line usually on the back of a slow play the ball or a set restart off a tap. We need to measure his performances differently now, he's done a good job taking the hard early carries, it's an ugly job but he's done it effectively IMO.
Im a fan of SST and feel he has the most growth of all three players mentioned,I’m happy to give him time to mature into the new role which is obviously very foreign to him!
Comment
-
There is no reason Reece Robinson should be given another chance. His body language gave the impression he is not graduating to NRL standard anytime soon.
Jake Friend is not a threat in attack and that stupid play he did on the last tackle where he ran himself and got tackled while contemplating if he should give the ball to Tedesco (a player who can create something out of nothing) shows his not up to NRL standard as a hooker either at least not for 80 minutes.
It's the same game plan every week, the forwards are not a threat because everyone knows they never offload.
To me it's a lack of confidence that the players are missing. The whole team is concerned about not making mistakes and I would imagine the last thing that Robbo tells them before they run out is don't drop the ball,
which of course only results in them dropping the ball. We have seen what a change in coach has done for a rubbish team like the Tigers, they are playing with unbelievable confidence.
Comment
Comment