> EVIDENCE ACT 1995 (Cth) - SECT 59
>The hearsay rule--exclusion of hearsay evidence
> (1) Evidence of a previous representation made by a person is not admissible to prove the existence of a fact that it can reasonably be supposed that the person intended to assert by the representation.
That said, he's made clear this is one of those 'believe it or not' stories. I don't... but I enjoy the banter.
>The hearsay rule--exclusion of hearsay evidence
> (1) Evidence of a previous representation made by a person is not admissible to prove the existence of a fact that it can reasonably be supposed that the person intended to assert by the representation.
That said, he's made clear this is one of those 'believe it or not' stories. I don't... but I enjoy the banter.
Comment