ROC 181 - Maybe reckless , but attacking the legs of the kicker definitely not.
If you watch the vision in the link in Comment #158 by Frozen Chook there is a shoot in the 47th sec which has a good angle on the timing of the launch in relation to the time of the kick, watch his head and you will see "no intent to deliberately contact the player", the comment Frozen makes with the position of the Pocket Ref is correct he calls all clear and moves down field.
The field official is closer than us all , it is unfortunate that the Player was injured however these things happen.
Why is there trial by Vidiot when a player goes down injured? This is where the controversy starts by the continual reviewing of the field officials by the TMO.
Graham is definitely up there in the Grub stakes , I think he even acknowledges that it warranted a penalty but blew up delux when the incident went on report and the mark was advanced - watch all the vision and what happens in the back ground.
If you watch the vision in the link in Comment #158 by Frozen Chook there is a shoot in the 47th sec which has a good angle on the timing of the launch in relation to the time of the kick, watch his head and you will see "no intent to deliberately contact the player", the comment Frozen makes with the position of the Pocket Ref is correct he calls all clear and moves down field.
The field official is closer than us all , it is unfortunate that the Player was injured however these things happen.
Why is there trial by Vidiot when a player goes down injured? This is where the controversy starts by the continual reviewing of the field officials by the TMO.
Graham is definitely up there in the Grub stakes , I think he even acknowledges that it warranted a penalty but blew up delux when the incident went on report and the mark was advanced - watch all the vision and what happens in the back ground.
Comment