Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Match Fixing claims Quashed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by OVP View Post
    Its got nothing to do with the players' decision Rusty, our club's name has been defamed.
    Maybe the club just doesn't want to open Pandora's Box....

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by OVP View Post
      Its got nothing to do with the players' decision Rusty, our club's name has been defamed.
      rest assured the players defamed the clubs name, dragging up the past will make it worse.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by OVP View Post
        Its got nothing to do with the players' decision Rusty, our club's name has been defamed.
        Our Club's name and reputation was also defamed by a number of its own players. Are they meant to take legal action against them as well???


        NC
        Supporting the RW&B, through good times and bad times.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by novice chook View Post
          Our Club's name and reputation was also defamed by a number of its own players. Are they meant to take legal action against them as well???


          NC
          There'll be no legal action by anybody

          The Roosters understand that it's in their own interest to avoid closer scrutiny of the matter

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
            There'll be no legal action by anybody

            The Roosters understand that it's in their own interest to avoid closer scrutiny of the matter
            And that's exactly how it should be. The Club needs to take some responsibility for allowing its players' behaviour to spiral as out of control as it did, not to mention tolerating their inept performances week after week because they were not focussed on their footy, rather on their off field exploits.


            NC
            Supporting the RW&B, through good times and bad times.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by novice chook View Post
              And that's exactly how it should be. The Club needs to take some responsibility for allowing its players' behaviour to spiral as out of control as it did, not to mention tolerating their inept performances week after week because they were not focussed on their footy, rather on their off field exploits.


              NC
              Totally agree

              And from a different perspective, legal action means the defendants (be they The SMH or the NSWTAB) will need to defend their claims. In terms of the Herald, that would mean identifying the anonymous Roosters player who cast serious doubts as to the integrity of other players.

              In terms of the NSW TAB, it could mean viewing CCTV footage from TAB outlets where the 13+ bets were placed in order to identify who placed them

              For punters not wishing to have any real record kept of a bet, betting at a TAB outlet is ideal. If you bet with a bookmaker over the phone or online, or with Betfair, or even if via a TAB phone account, your name is of course recorded in terms of all bets made from your account. At a TAB outlet, it's completely anonymous

              This investigation by the VCGR was primarily about rubber stamping claims by the NRL that no evidence had been presented to substantiate the claims of a fix. It wasn't about looking for any evidence. Kind of like somebody not being charged with something because the authorities don't have enough evidence to mahe the charge stick. Totally different to being charged and then found not guilty

              Comment

              Working...
              X