Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Souff Sydney Piggy Backs' Freight Train just started rollin'...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by player 1 View Post
    So we've received 2 more penalties than Souths? Wow, a stunning figure. Why not highlight they have conceded 39 less than us? That doesn't suit your agenda.
    Cronulla have conceded 57 less than us. Why not highlight that?

    Oh that's right, doesn't suit your agenda against Souths.


    ours is far and away the worst, but for your own grandiose reasons you ignore that
    How did I ignore that? If you bothered to read my post I clearly stated we are the most heavily scrutinized team in the competition.

    So once again... how did I ignore that?

    You can believe whatever you want, but if you don't see that Souths were awarded that match against Manly the other night then you have zero insight yourself.
    Where did i say Souths weren't given most of the calls against Manly?
    Thanks for assuming I believe Manly were given a fair match.

    I call you as the bullshit artist.
    Alright mate, whatever helps you sleep at night. And continue stating the Referees want to gift Souths the premiership, when facts CLEARLY depict that they don't even receive the most penalties... not even close.

    If you want to prove something, back it up. You haven't been able to prove shit.

    Comment


    • #92
      Some of you are very much showing how afraid you are of Souths and the Refs. It's very much manifesting in your delusions and paranoias.

      Yes the Refs have shown to heavily scruitinise us and unjustly so, but to claim certain teams receive favourable treatment when statistics show the complete opposite is laughable..

      Forget the refs. Our boys are having a good season, and the more they focus on them, the more i fear it will be to their detriment.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Chook Norris View Post
        Cronulla have conceded 57 less than us. Why not highlight that?

        Oh that's right, doesn't suit your agenda against Souths.




        How did I ignore that? If you bothered to read my post I clearly stated we are the most heavily scrutinized team in the competition.

        So once again... how did I ignore that?



        Where did i say Souths weren't given most of the calls against Manly?
        Thanks for assuming I believe Manly were given a fair match.



        Alright mate, whatever helps you sleep at night. And continue stating the Referees want to gift Souths the premiership, when facts CLEARLY depict that they don't even receive the most penalties... not even close.

        If you want to prove something, back it up. You haven't been able to prove shit.
        there is too many of them CN, they are content with their conspiracy theories and your facts are powerless against their mindless arguments.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by kegs1 View Post
          there is too many of them CN, they are content with their conspiracy theories and your facts are powerless against their mindless arguments.
          Speaking of "mindless arguments", you still haven't reconciled your disdain for all these "conspiracy theorists" with your public declaration that at least two first grade referees are cheats. Let me give you a few possible solutions to your dilemma:

          (a) Retract your statements about those two referees. You were tired and emotional at the time and can now see that the two gentlemen in question are beyond reproach.
          (b) Explain that just because two referees are cheats, this does not mean there is a conspiracy against the Roosters. These two referees cheat independently of each other and of the NRL. There is therefore no "conspiracy" against the Roosters. If we get either of these guys in an important game, we're screwed, but we can take solace in the fact that the game is (mostly) pure as the driven snow.
          (c) Someone has hacked your account.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Spirit of 66 View Post
            Speaking of "mindless arguments", you still haven't reconciled your disdain for all these "conspiracy theorists" with your public declaration that at least two first grade referees are cheats. Let me give you a few possible solutions to your dilemma:

            (a) Retract your statements about those two referees. You were tired and emotional at the time and can now see that the two gentlemen in question are beyond reproach.
            (b) Explain that just because two referees are cheats, this does not mean there is a conspiracy against the Roosters. These two referees cheat independently of each other and of the NRL. There is therefore no "conspiracy" against the Roosters. If we get either of these guys in an important game, we're screwed, but we can take solace in the fact that the game is (mostly) pure as the driven snow.
            (c) Someone has hacked your account.
            You have Kegs... Head in the sand... . The new Ralph and Mickey.
            Last edited by turk-283; 08-19-2013, 12:01 AM.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Chook Norris View Post
              Some of you are very much showing how afraid you are of Souths and the Refs. It's very much manifesting in your delusions and paranoias.

              Yes the Refs have shown to heavily scruitinise us and unjustly so, but to claim certain teams receive favourable treatment when statistics show the complete opposite is laughable..
              Forget the refs. Our boys are having a good season, and the more they focus on them, the more i fear it will be to their detriment.
              After 2010 Why wouldn't we be?. It's not so much the number of penalties but when and where there given. We won't get a penalty for 40 or 50min , in that time the opposition will get half a dozen piggybacks down the field . Then , to make things look better, we will get a few worthless penalties, usually on there try line, allowing them to get there defenece set, or they'll come after the game has been decided.
              Proud member of the Ricky Stuart Appreciation club - Laurie Frier walks on water tra lal lala lar la la lar.

              A Rooster is a cocky strutting bird that will not take a backward step!

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by kegs1 View Post
                there is too many of them CN, they are content with their conspiracy theories and your facts are powerless against their mindless arguments.
                That is f**king hilarious coming from you!! Do you even watch $ouff$ games or even Roosters games for that matter??
                The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                Here's looking at you, kid.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by tri-hard View Post
                  After 2010 Why wouldn't we be?. It's not so much the number of penalties but when and where there given. We won't get a penalty for 40 or 50min , in that time the opposition will get half a dozen piggybacks down the field . Then , to make things look better, we will get a few worthless penalties, usually on there try line, allowing them to get there defenece set, or they'll come after the game has been decided.
                  Give that man a cigar, absolutely spot on post!!

                  That is exactly what Toovey was getting at in part of his roast after the game against $ouff$!! This has happened loads of times in $ouff$ games, when the result is already determined the refs can afford to blow some penalties against $ouff$ to make it look better on the stats at the end of the game!!
                  The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                  Here's looking at you, kid.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by chook norris View Post
                    some of you are very much showing how afraid you are of souths and the refs. It's very much manifesting in your delusions and paranoias.

                    Yes the refs have shown to heavily scruitinise us and unjustly so, but to claim certain teams receive favourable treatment when statistics show the complete opposite is laughable..

                    Forget the refs. Our boys are having a good season, and the more they focus on them, the more i fear it will be to their detriment.
                    so i can assume you saw the cheats v the knaughts game. I like the way coooper teflon cronk didnt get sent because he didnt do enough to be a proffessional foul. But i guess tacking a runner/chaser of the opposition without the ball and stopping him from atleast have a fair crack at the contest. Bull$hit some teams arent protected from the refs. The cheats are one as too tigpies and shire
                    1911 1912 1913 1923 1935 1936 1937 1940 1945 1974 1975 2002 2013 2018 2019 2020

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by easts4eva View Post
                      Winning or losing penalty counts is irrelevent. Getting the calls really determine the outcome of the game. Disallowed trys bad forward pass calls etc, are the things that can really kill you.
                      I certainly wouldn't say that penalty counts are irrelevant, it is the timing of the penalty given which is HUGELY relevant!!

                      The bold part of what you say is so true, and this goes to show that certain posters on here who valiantly defend $ouff$, (for whatever God damn reason I will never understand on a Roosters forum from supposed Roosters supporters) don't even watch $ouff$ games and see all the calls they get from the video refs, as well as all the leniency they are shown by the refs!!

                      $ouff$ are even worse than the storm at wrestling and slowing down the play the ball, and yet they get away with it far more! While watching a $ouff$ game I will constantly be saying, if a Roosters player did that they would be penalized but they get away with it, and I repeat that over and f**king over during their games!!

                      Just a little example that I had a real laugh about recently, in the $ouff$ vs storm game $am burge$$ nearly takes slater's head off. Slater naturally stays down for quite some time after such a high hard hit allowing the video ref plenty of time to see the incident and call for a penalty. No penalty was given, and the prick didn't even get a suspension, but guaranteed if it was a Roosters player he would have been penalized and suspended!! gi gets the smallest of little brushes across his lip, which was as hard as a fly landing on you against manly and he takes an obvious dive. What ends up happening, but of course a penalty given to $ouff$ and player put on report, what a f**king outrageous joke!!

                      It is so blatantly obvious that $ouff$ are favored by the refs/video refs and the Roosters are on the complete opposite of that, and if you can't see that you are a blind f**king idiot who has NFI about rugby league!!
                      The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                      Here's looking at you, kid.

                      Comment


                      • It's not just the timing of the penalties, its also where they're given. Souths were given 5 or 6 piggy backs on Friday night to get them out of their own end. There's no surprise that they came good in the last 20 minutes to win the game - they hadn't had to use the same amount of petrol as Manly earlier in the game.

                        Imagine how potent our attack would be if we got the same amount of piggy backs and we hadn't had to use a ton of energy just to get the ball down the other end.....

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by roosterproud View Post
                          so i can assume you saw the cheats v the knaughts game. I like the way coooper teflon cronk didnt get sent because he didnt do enough to be a proffessional foul. But i guess tacking a runner/chaser of the opposition without the ball and stopping him from atleast have a fair crack at the contest. Bull$hit some teams arent protected from the refs. The cheats are one as too tigpies and shire
                          What a crock! The Storm were murdered by the refs yesterday. So they didn't give him 10, so what, the refs haven't sent a player for a spell in years.

                          The so called leg up teams get. Why do people say the storm are protected, yet the get killed by the refs yesterday??

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by adzta View Post
                            What a crock! The Storm were murdered by the refs yesterday. So they didn't give him 10, so what, the refs haven't sent a player for a spell in years.

                            The so called leg up teams get. Why do people say the storm are protected, yet the get killed by the refs yesterday??
                            THE CHEATS WERE HELPEDE AT THE MOST NEEDED TIMES BY THE REFS. THE REFS BIAS PENALITY COUNT TOWArds the knaughts was mainly due to having 25 thou knaughts fans making the decisions for them. a good home crowd will do that.

                            why does slater still get away with the shoulder charge. youll see nearly every time the opposition makes a break to score in the corner slater wont offer a tackle but a diving shoulder charge or better still a leading legs slide into the opposition

                            ok lets see if there will any opportunities for a send off with the remaining games. especially for unsportsman like behaviour. taking some out while competing for the ball.
                            1911 1912 1913 1923 1935 1936 1937 1940 1945 1974 1975 2002 2013 2018 2019 2020

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Kingsgrove-Loiner View Post
                              It's not just the timing of the penalties, its also where they're given. Souths were given 5 or 6 piggy backs on Friday night to get them out of their own end. There's no surprise that they came good in the last 20 minutes to win the game - they hadn't had to use the same amount of petrol as Manly earlier in the game.

                              Imagine how potent our attack would be if we got the same amount of piggy backs and we hadn't had to use a ton of energy just to get the ball down the other end.....
                              Great post KL! Part of me talking about the timing of the penalties was also meaning exactly what you said about where they're given, as that is crucial and where $ouff$ get major benefit with from the refs!

                              The refs/video refs won that game for $ouff$ against manly! I am still standing and applauding Toovey's roasting of the refs, and Shane Flanagan came out in support of Toovey as well, and I have no doubt that Robbo would be thinking the same thing! But than according to certain geniuses on here they know better than 3 NRL coaches!

                              I had to laugh when doing the NRL fan survey when I come across 2 questions. One was have you forgiven SBW, really, who gives a flying f**k what happened 5 years ago, get over it FFS!! The other one was which player in the NRL do you hate. They had 1 player from every team to choose from EXCEPT $ouff$, fmd, this goes to show that the NRL's way of thinking is that no one could possibly hate any $ouff$ player, they couldn't be further from the truth!!

                              By the way $ouff$ player jeff lima gets only a 1 week suspension for that deliberate leg twist trying injure whatnow. Yet again even more proof that the NRL favors $ouff$, what a f**king joke, if that was a Roosters player and in particular JWH, would have been rubbed out for up to 8 weeks for such a dog of an act!! And don't forget the extremely light verdict for the dog of an act $am burge$$ did with the squirrel grip where he was given only 1 week with 1 extra week because of a terrible record. Favoritism galore given to $ouff$ and yet some can't see the forest from the trees!
                              The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                              Here's looking at you, kid.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by The Rooster Oracle View Post
                                Great post KL! Part of me talking about the timing of the penalties was also meaning exactly what you said about where they're given, as that is crucial and where $ouff$ get major benefit with from the refs!

                                The refs/video refs won that game for $ouff$ against manly! I am still standing and applauding Toovey's roasting of the refs, and Shane Flanagan came out in support of Toovey as well, and I have no doubt that Robbo would be thinking the same thing! But than according to certain geniuses on here they know better than 3 NRL coaches!

                                I had to laugh when doing the NRL fan survey when I come across 2 questions. One was have you forgiven SBW, really, who gives a flying f**k what happened 5 years ago, get over it FFS!! The other one was which player in the NRL do you hate. They had 1 player from every team to choose from EXCEPT $ouff$, fmd, this goes to show that the NRL's way of thinking is that no one could possibly hate any $ouff$ player, they couldn't be further from the truth!!

                                By the way $ouff$ player jeff lima gets only a 1 week suspension for that deliberate leg twist trying injure whatnow. Yet again even more proof that the NRL favors $ouff$, what a f**king joke, if that was a Roosters player and in particular JWH, would have been rubbed out for up to 8 weeks for such a dog of an act!! And don't forget the extremely light verdict for the dog of an act $am burge$$ did with the squirrel grip where he was given only 1 week with 1 extra week because of a terrible record. Favoritism galore given to $ouff$ and yet some can't see the forest from the trees!
                                More than likely because he has carry over points from a previous charge. But hey, don't let the facts get in the way of a good story.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X