Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Head butt on RTS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by SConcierge View Post
    Its a case of how things work these days we pander to minorities, lets not discuss or find solutions to what is affecting the majority of the populations lets focus and solve the biggest issues of the monority instead lol
    I love it how you say "these days" as though things were better way back when.

    Let's just take a look at some of the great things that we used to enjoy in the western world that we now just don't have anymore:
    • World Wars
    • Genocide
    • White Australia Policy
    • Segregation
    • Political Assassinations
    • Zero health care

    Yeah - things have really gone to the dogs since we started pandering to minorities. When I'm President, those pesky poofs with all of their perversions around sex and love and those damn bleeding hearts who actually care about the downtrodden will be first against the wall…
    Making Steve Naughton look like Vince Mellars...

    Comment


    • #47
      id just like him to stick his whistle where his man friend goes!

      Comment


      • #48
        I re watched our domanace over mandy have noticed how poorly the refs know the rules.
        1 in the rts head clash I think there should be a compashionate rule for this and just give the ball back to the player last in possession. like the passing after the refs calling held.

        one rule that frustrates the shit out of me is the zero rule.
        The zero rule is when an attacking team is deemed to have lost control of the ball and the opposition player picks it up. and if that player doesn't lose the ball, or pass it it will be a zero tackle. These clowns whom hate us don't use it when we have the zero but they award us a 1st tackle.

        mandy on Monday night picked up one of our knock ons and passed 2 or 3 times in the centre of the field and were deemed a zero....that should have the 1st tackle.

        another madigrass hero stuff up was when mandy lost the ball forwad on our 40m line and mini went 15meters back to retieve the ball and gave up a voluntary tackle and wasn't a zero nore was there any advantage from the mandy knock on.

        you don't kneed to believe in us be discriminated against from these guys in pink but their manipulation of the rules is an utter discust.
        1911 1912 1913 1923 1935 1936 1937 1940 1945 1974 1975 2002 2013 2018 2019 2020

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Salvatori Grubber View Post
          I love it how you say "these days" as though things were better way back when.

          Let's just take a look at some of the great things that we used to enjoy in the western world that we now just don't have anymore:
          • World Wars
          • Genocide
          • White Australia Policy
          • Segregation
          • Political Assassinations
          • Zero health care

          Yeah - things have really gone to the dogs since we started pandering to minorities. When I'm President, those pesky poofs with all of their perversions around sex and love and those damn bleeding hearts who actually care about the downtrodden will be first against the wall…
          I think it's remarkable my thread has prompted your post and others. My point, which most but not all have flatly disagreed with, was I believe the way that tackler launched himself at RTS was at best stupid, or "spastic" as another poster put it, and at worst reckless. The way he approached RTS was never going to result in a fair ball and all tackle. We see accidental head clashes all the time - this was at least as bad as a shoulder charge, and with a much worse result than most of these now outlawed tackles.

          Yes it hurts when someone calls you a pathetic whinger. I was expressing, it appears against the opinions of most, my view that RTS was entitled to carry the ball forward without having to worry about a defender squaring up against him leading with his head - which like it or not is exactly what occurred - were his arms and rest of his body posture suggesting he had the intention of effecting a tackle? No.

          Yes the silly prick himself was injured. So are suicide bombers (no disrespect to ethnic minorities intended).

          Comment

          Working...
          X