Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Head butt on RTS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Head butt on RTS

    I don't care that the manly nong got hurt doing it - he made contact with Roger's head. Even if it was accidental, the rules state if direct contact is made with the head when tackling its a penalty. Accidental elbow to head? Penalty. Accidental head butt? Penalty.

    What was worse was Roger managed to throw the ball about 20 feet backwards before he fell.

    That odious little cheat, who thought it was important we all knew his sexual preferences, immediately called time off and then insulted our intelligence by not only failing to penalise the tackle, but gave them the friggin ball!

    And that was one of his better decisions...

  • #2
    yawn.

    Comment


    • #3
      Have a go at the refs all you want but people (and the admins) need to pull their heads in with all of the Cecchin gay-bashing. It's pathetic.

      And so is wanting a penalty for an accidental head clash, just quietly.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Ghost of Finch View Post
        Have a go at the refs all you want but people (and the admins) need to pull their heads in with all of the Cecchin gay-bashing. It's pathetic.

        And so is wanting a penalty for an accidental head clash, just quietly.
        agreed. Cechin made a couple of bad calls but there is no need to bring his sexuality into it, it has nothing to do with it.

        Comment


        • #5
          I couldnt give a stuff either way Whether he likes to pots the pink or brown Or even whether he likes his own brown potted However Chechin has made himself the butt of all jokes by bringing his sexuality into it himself

          maricon de la playa
          I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
            I couldnt give a stuff either way Whether he likes to pots the pink or brown Or even whether he likes his own brown potted However Chechin has made himself the butt of all jokes by bringing his sexuality into it himself

            maricon de la playa
            that gives you no right, abusing him about his sexuality is looked upon in the same light as abusing someone for their race. I try not to be the 'mr nice guy' too often, but if it's Checins fault for bringing it on himself, when is he supposed to come out and say it?
            Kids these days are encourage to not admit they are gay until they are out of school, that way they avoid the inevitable bullying they will receive. But what happens when people are still being bullied to the point of abuse when they are older, and they have finally admitted to it?
            In school, in their jobs, where ever it may be, it is discrimination.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by kegs1 View Post
              that gives you no right, abusing him about his sexuality is looked upon in the same light as abusing someone for their race. I try not to be the 'mr nice guy' too often, but if it's Checins fault for bringing it on himself, when is he supposed to come out and say it?
              Kids these days are encourage to not admit they are gay until they are out of school, that way they avoid the inevitable bullying they will receive. But what happens when people are still being bullied to the point of abuse when they are older, and they have finally admitted to it?
              In school, in their jobs, where ever it may be, it is discrimination.
              Fair post in some ways So if I call Chechin an ass bandit I am discriminating against him But if Checchin calls me a clit licker He is not ?

              As I said I dont care either way about Checchins sexuality or anyone elses for that matter Each to their own I say
              I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                Fair post in some ways So if I call Chechin an ass bandit I am discriminating against him But if Checchin calls me a clit licker He is not ?

                As I said I dont care either way about Checchins sexuality or anyone elses for that matter Each to their own I say
                well firstly they were pretty piss poor insults there mate
                secondly, yes, if checin called you a clit licker, that would be discrimination. It would be pretty rare to see someone getting abused for being straight but yes, it is discrimination.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                  Fair post in some ways So if I call Chechin an ass bandit I am discriminating against him But if Checchin calls me a clit licker He is not ?

                  As I said I dont care either way about Checchins sexuality or anyone elses for that matter Each to their own I say
                  you are a nauseating creature

                  in so many ways...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by player 1:315296
                    I don't care that the manly nong got hurt doing it - he made contact with Roger's head. Even if it was accidental, the rules state if direct contact is made with the head when tackling its a penalty. Accidental elbow to head? Penalty. Accidental head butt? Penalty.

                    What was worse was Roger managed to throw the ball about 20 feet backwards before he fell.

                    That odious little cheat, who thought it was important we all knew his sexual preferences, immediately called time off and then insulted our intelligence by not only failing to penalise the tackle, but gave them the friggin ball!

                    And that was one of his better decisions...
                    The bad call was giving a knock on and not letting us play the ball, but fark me if you are going to whinge about a penalty not given for a headclash then wake up to yourself.

                    We receive some dodgy calls but complaining about a penalty not given for that is ridiculous.

                    If it happened against us and the other team got a penalty, the forum would be filled with conspiracy theories.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by tony the wheel View Post
                      you are a nauseating creature

                      in so many ways...
                      Coming from you this is a compliment
                      I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by tony the wheel View Post
                        you are a nauseating creature

                        in so many ways...
                        have you seen your head lately mate?
                        Last edited by kegs1; 07-02-2013, 03:37 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The only thing about Matt Checcin outside of his incompetency as a referee that I would care about is if he derived sexual pleasure from children.

                          As he doesn't, the only thing I care about is his incompetency as a referee.
                          SUPER DRAGON!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            how the hell this cheat called the high shot on JWH a knock on is beyond me he did not even get the video ref to check it

                            thank god fox put up replays if it and it clearly shows JWH was taken around the neck

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                              Fair post in some ways So if I call Chechin an ass bandit I am discriminating against him But if Checchin calls me a clit licker He is not ?

                              As I said I dont care either way about Checchins sexuality or anyone elses for that matter Each to their own I say
                              This is a completely ludicrous argument that I would have thought you to be above.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X