yeh I thinking the same question he needed to play the whole 80 minutes because there were times were warriors defence opended up there the end of the game and sbw would of killed it but Mortimer should of played longer than he did, hes a good impact player but didn't get enough time to make an impact
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why was SBW taken off?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Fleabag Fletch View PostGuerra did my head in last night. Three times through the game, SBW made a half break and Guerra was out of position outside him. Either overrunning a potential pass or running through and getting in SBW's way. On one occassion, SBW pretty much did a voluntary tackle to avoid getting pinged for obstruction.
Guerra's been out of sorts all year. At full strength, I wouldn't have him in the team.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fleabag Fletch View PostGuerra did my head in last night. Three times through the game, SBW made a half break and Guerra was out of position outside him. Either overrunning a potential pass or running through and getting in SBW's way. On one occassion, SBW pretty much did a voluntary tackle to avoid getting pinged for obstruction.
Guerra's been out of sorts all year. At full strength, I wouldn't have him in the team.
But he scored a try?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BigMike View PostOn a related note - how sad is it to see SBW poke his head out of every tackle and offer the offload only for nobody to be within the area to capitalise.
If we had a good fast fullback, he would be eating tries on the regular. Imagine Barba sniffing around SBW.
Our lack of a quality fullback really hurts our ability and structure in attack.
Comment
Comment