Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Support for jared.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Muffdaddy View Post
    I should've added the 'roll eyes' emoticon as it was a sarcastic comment. Everyone blames Smiff for everything.
    Thanks fred

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Muffdaddy View Post
      I should've added the 'roll eyes' emoticon as it was a sarcastic comment. Everyone blames Smiff for everything.
      Probably.

      You see when you state something at the start of a sentence, the emphasis the point at the end, it doesn't come across as sarcastic. If you just left the little dig at the end we would have got it.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by adzta View Post
        You make some good points Muff, but to blame Smith blows your argument to bits. The bloke plays hard and will get suspended most years. By saying that it's Smith fault, you are now saying Robbo is letting Jarred go unchecked.

        Funny stuff.
        The blaming Smiff bit at the end was tongue in cheek.
        But obviously Robbo has done some work with him in regards to his tackling tecnique, which is why up to the other night he's been fine. I reckon Rose dipped a bit and Jared went a tad too high.
        I just can't hack the hysteria on here about the 5 weeks bit.
        Member 2008 - forever

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Muffdaddy View Post
          FFS people!! He got two weeks!!!
          Because of his ill discipline that went unchecked by Brian Smith, he has loading plus carry over points, hence the 5 weeks.
          If it was his first offence it would've just been the 2 weeks.
          he is a repeat offender, again and again. Every year now for the last 3 years.
          As was Morley and Crocker. You need these guys in the team for what they bring, but you have to be prepared to suffer the consequences.
          Stop this rubbish about the grading and how 5 weeks is unfair.
          HE DID'NT GET 5 WEEKS FOR THIS TACKLE. HE GOT 2 WEEKS.
          The rest is his history. Yet another thing we can blame Smiff for. He should've reeled in Jared and got him sorted years ago.
          The Smith bit is malarkey but I agree 100% on the rest - two weeks is fair and the loading is what hurt us - rules is rules.

          He shouldn't have been marched but I am not sure if we win that game if he stays on the field - we went up a couple of gears when he went off.

          Comment


          • #35
            At the end of the day....I still hate Souths with a passion!
            Now we have to rely on a Teletubby to be our enforcer. That's a worry!
            Time for Luke O'Donnell to stand up.....

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by adzta View Post
              Probably.

              You see when you state something at the start of a sentence, the emphasis the point at the end, it doesn't come across as sarcastic. If you just left the little dig at the end we would have got it.
              Yeah, when I re-read my post I can see how it came across.
              Member 2008 - forever

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Muffdaddy View Post
                Yeah, when I re-read my post I can see how it came across.
                All good Muff. I am with you on the fact there are a heap of people who get into a flap about nothing, on here. Seems like a big deal to get their post counts up or something. Rather sad really.

                Comment

                Working...
                X