Chooks implicated in drug scandal?

[stsae]

Well there aint too many to choose from! In fact only one and he was one of ours! >]

Funny thing is he looked more like he was on the KFC rather than the juice, if it is in fact that same coqqsukka.

I wonder if it was more a social drug??? Cos from my knowledge they dont have to be reported??? Or is that wrong???

[Rooster_6]

Funny thing is he looked more like he was on the KFC rather than the juice, if it is in fact that same coqqsukka.

I wonder if it was more a social drug??? Cos from my knowledge they dont have to be reported??? Or is that wrong???

Yeh it's quite obviously a recreational drug, the club would be forced to tell the NRL if they had any knowledge of a performance enhancing drug.

[Danish]

If there were any even tenuous link to our club you can bet your bottom dollar the telegraph would have run it on the backpage already by now

[Hawkeye]

If there were any even tenuous link to our club you can bet your bottom dollar the telegraph would have run it on the backpage already by now

Absolutely !
.....though would appear that Rosey Cheeks is to busy battening down the hatches to run cover for his beloved gummies who look like being drawn in to some extent !

[dj_sta]

IMO, this article makes it obvious who the NRL player is...



http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news...-1226572113320

I hope its not MJ and its BJ instead.....

[Andrew Walker]

If any of the chook players are involved then our club should get their money back, based on the way we have played for the last 2 years.

As I said in the other thread This is very much a level playing field If you are on the gear it does not guarantee success when everyone else is as well

[rooster_booster]

Where do you draw the line? I think its all a storm in a tea cup. I hate how all these people have unfair competitive advantages over me because they practice more often and train harder than me.

[Guest]

I hope its not MJ and its BJ instead.....

If Panthers had the chance to tear up Jennings' contract they would have taken it. As it stands, Panthers are still paying part of his contract.

[Bansai Pipeline]

And we did release BJ suddenly.

Who knows.

For me the bigger issue is match fixing. Drugs are rife, I'd have thought.

[stsae]

If Panthers had the chance to tear up Jennings' contract they would have taken it. As it stands, Panthers are still paying part of his contract.

Good point mate.

Whereas BJ was sacked from what I recall. And there was no reason forthcoming I can remember other than a discipline issue. And we all know to sack an employee like that you must show cause, it's not as simple as it once was.

Interestingly I noted Waynekerr quoted somewhere saying he doesn't employ drug takers. That did make me .

There is always the option it may be another player. From the way I read that I don't recall it specifying the player in question was actually sacked???

[Guest]

If there were any even tenuous link to our club you can bet your bottom dollar the telegraph would have run it on the backpage already by now

Like this, you mean?

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226573027718

[Guest]

There is always the option it may be another player. From the way I read that I don't recall it specifying the player in question was actually sacked???

If the article is accurate with timing (before christmas) then the player in question would have already been in pre-season training for 2013 for their old club. i.e. they would have had to have been a late transfer to new club.

So yes, it could have been a small handful of players other than BJ.

[Guest]

And we did release BJ suddenly.

Who knows.

For me the bigger issue is match fixing. Drugs are rife, I'd have thought.

Why match fixing?

Only 1 suspected instance being investigated and we don't even know which code

[Guest]

Like this, you mean?

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226573027718

What does that have to do with us?

[Guest]

What does that have to do with us?

read the post I responded to