Interesting Stats

[Guest]

13 vs 13.......pretty indicative of how things went

runs (metres)
Bwaif 8(44)
Ashley 17(136)

Tackles
Bwaif 14
Ashley 36

Offloads
Bwaif 0
Ashley 1

Penalties Conceded
Bwaif 1
Ashley 0

Pay packet
Bwaif "the next freddy" Marquee
Ashley play 4 the luv of itz

[Guest]

u didnt need to dig up stats for someone to tell u that.

[Geohood]

LOL... you're a lost cause mate

[Guest]

LOL. 4sure!!1

[Guest]

Useless grubbers. Anasta 17, Harrisson 0

[Guest]

How about you take a look at Carney, who was absolute garbage, as opposed to a player who scored one try running a beautiful line, set up another with an awesome no look pass, and actually had a pretty decent game?

[Guest]

You really have a sick obsession with anasta buddy, it's starting to be a bit too much

[Guest]

How about you take a look at Carney, who was absolute garbage, as opposed to a player who scored one try running a beautiful line, set up another with an awesome no look pass, and actually had a pretty decent game?

I think the point i sour forwards were dominated. Pearce set 2 tries up out of nothing and yes Anasta and Dowell were on the end. But Anasta is a lock and when you compare him with other locks he is worse than he was at 6.

[Guest]

I think the point i sour forwards were dominated. Pearce set 2 tries up out of nothing and yes Anasta and Dowell were on the end. But Anasta is a lock and when you compare him with other locks he is worse than he was at 6.

Can you just post from one account? Makes it easier to keep track.

If you're trying to say you think we should go back to Anasta in the halves and Carney at 1, you're a fool.

Anasta is a second five eighth. In terms of the roles each man plays, MAubs is our lock. I don't know why this is so hard to understand. Maybe you've never chucked a footy around before. It's pretty clear what role Braith is playing.

[Guest]

Can you just post from one account? Makes it easier to keep track.

If you're trying to say you think we should go back to Anasta in the halves and Carney at 1, you're a fool.

Anasta is a second five eighth. In terms of the roles each man plays, MAubs is our lock. I don't know why this is so hard to understand. Maybe you've never chucked a footy around before. It's pretty clear what role Braith is playing.

NO ANASTA TO 6 NOOOOOOOOOOOO Blind fag. Never said that.

Oh so Anasta is our 2nd 5/8. Right. Despite having played a fair bit my impression remains that if he is deemed to be a "2nd 5/8 (lol) than that applies only in attack. Never heard of someone wearing a 13 on his back doing 20% less of the defensive work than the 7. His stats are appalling.

[Guest]

Nick Kouparitsas: 1 run 10m gained, 10 tackles, 13km covered on exercise bike.

[Guest]

Nick Kouparitsas: 1 run 10m gained, 10 tackles, 13km covered on exercise bike.

He's an easy mark, go harder.

[Guest]

I agree that Anasta has had some quality touches, the big problem is that he doesn't roll up his sleeves and do any farking work.

I struggle to recall one hit up by Anasta. Even Graham took a hard one straight up the middle so why can't Bwaif?

[Headless Chook]

I agree that Anasta has had some quality touches, the big problem is that he doesn't roll up his sleeves and do any farking work.

I struggle to recall one hit up by Anasta. Even Graham took a hard one straight up the middle so why can't Bwaif?

Maybe Phil likes it that way!

[Guest]

By his own standards, Anasta's game last night was above average

But the sooner he is no longer part of the 17 the better

His leadership, or lack thereof, is also concerning

Standing behind the goalposts after conceeding tries, head down, not talking, not leading

Most of the talking he does is complaining to the referees