Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Am i reading this right ..{Manly robbed }

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Am i reading this right ..{Manly robbed }

    MANLY ROBBED>>>>>>>>>>My mate Peter Jones has come up with a great point , in the NRL 2014 rule book.:..{quote }.For all finals games including the grand final ,in the event of a draw at full time , extra time of 10 mins each way will be played, if the scores are still level at the expiration of extra time ,the coin will be tossed with the winner of the toss electing the end of ground to defend and play will continue until the next score, That score will determine the winner...............No mention of Golden Point.... Look for > Section 6 { scoring tries and goals }...Deciding winners 2 B http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http...df&h=VAQFo5Tn3

  • #2
    No one mentioned it in 2010 when we beat Wests.

    Comment


    • #3
      don't tell me we have to play with toddy and braith again in a rematch?

      Comment


      • #4
        2014 NRL Laws and Interpretations:

        Drawn Game: "If scores are equal at the conclusion of
        normal time, a period of extra time shall
        follow whereby the first scorer of any point
        or points will immediately be declared
        the winner.
        This will be for a maximum period of 10
        minutes (5 minutes each half) except in Final
        Series Matches.
        If the scores are still level at the end of the
        period of extra time, then the game shall be
        declared a draw (except in Finals matches,
        where the match will continue until such time
        as one team scores a point or points.)."

        Comment


        • #5
          No NO NO

          This is the new & improved NRL rules book.


          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by chook 56 View Post
            No NO NO

            This is the new & improved NRL rules book.


            Damn...two extra No's and we could be confident these rules were endorsed by the great Gus Gould himself.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Jacks Fur Coat View Post
              Damn...two extra No's and we could be confident these rules were endorsed by the great Gus Gould himself.
              That would have been plagiarism.
              I played safe.

              Comment


              • #8
                Nasa is run by nazis.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Kingsgrove-Loiner View Post
                  No one mentioned it in 2010 when we beat Wests.
                  Well maybe they hadn't written the 2014 rule book back then.
                  ...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mr Chook View Post
                    2014 NRL Laws and Interpretations:

                    Drawn Game: "If scores are equal at the conclusion of
                    normal time, a period of extra time shall
                    follow whereby the first scorer of any point
                    or points will immediately be declared
                    the winner.
                    This will be for a maximum period of 10
                    minutes (5 minutes each half) except in Final
                    Series Matches.
                    If the scores are still level at the end of the
                    period of extra time, then the game shall be
                    declared a draw (except in Finals matches,
                    where the match will continue until such time
                    as one team scores a point or points.)."
                    Which is precisely what happened. Dogs scored first (before the 10 minute max occured), therefore they win. If neither of Manly or dogs scored in that 10 minute period it would have gone into extra, extra time until the first team scored. This is what happened in 2010 with Braith's FG. Scores were still level at the end of extra 10 minute time (golden point time) so they played extra time and SKD scored first - game over and fantastic Roosters win!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      If I were a Manly fan I'd be more annoyed at the stupid rule regarding a ball hitting a ref and gifting the ball back to the attacking team. What's to stop someone deliberately kicking near the ref to get an extra set of six?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by mightyrooster View Post
                        If I were a Manly fan I'd be more annoyed at the stupid rule regarding a ball hitting a ref and gifting the ball back to the attacking team. What's to stop someone deliberately kicking near the ref to get an extra set of six?
                        Well apparently the Dogs knew of that rule and used it to their favour. I read an article online that jnr Grub told Snr grub about it and used it at a time when it was their last tackle at an important moment.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by mightyrooster View Post
                          Which is precisely what happened. Dogs scored first (before the 10 minute max occured), therefore they win. If neither of Manly or dogs scored in that 10 minute period it would have gone into extra, extra time until the first team scored. This is what happened in 2010 with Braith's FG. Scores were still level at the end of extra 10 minute time (golden point time) so they played extra time and SKD scored first - game over and fantastic Roosters win!
                          Yep first scorer in extra time wins, no different to years gone by.
                          ...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I've had this song in my head all day. If one more person bleats to me about how their team has been robbed/stitched up/badly done by, they will be subjected to this:

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ROC181 View Post
                              Well apparently the Dogs knew of that rule and used it to their favour. I read an article online that jnr Grub told Snr grub about it and used it at a time when it was their last tackle at an important moment.
                              Well they need to change that rule NOW. It would explain why all the bullcheat players were in the ref's face demanding the ball back when it happened.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X