Video Refs

[ism22]

I like it because love their decisions or not, currently we are left with no explanation.

Sheck's 'no try' is a classic example! We watched the video... yep... Jennings is in (100 times), the pass was backwards, SBW's pass was backwards and RTS grounded the ball. At no time was there a suggestion of an obstruction.

Try... try... try?!?!? No try and no explanation.

Decision... penalty against the Roosters and Sharks are given a 'get out of gaol' free kick.

---

I think the refs are wrong but regardless (call it educational purposes?) I would like to know how they have come to their decision and what rule/precident they used when coming to their decision.

[Guest]

I like it because love their decisions or not, currently we are left with no explanation.

Sheck's 'no try' is a classic example! We watched the video... yep... Jennings is in (100 times), the pass was backwards, SBW's pass was backwards and RTS grounded the ball. At no time was there a suggestion of an obstruction.

Try... try... try?!?!? No try and no explanation.

Decision... penalty against the Roosters and Sharks are given a 'get out of gaol' free kick.

---

I think the refs are wrong but regardless (call it educational purposes?) I would like to know how they have come to their decision and what rule/precident they used when coming to their decision.

Thankyou for spelling 'gaol' correctly.

My year 6 teacher, Mr Challinor, would appreciate your efforts....

[ROC181]

The best option would be for Anderson to be connected to every game and either explain the call or over rule it, live! Might slow the game just a wee bit.