Just checking... 2 games in question... both small local towns with a big "local" presence. I feel that both "cheated" the clocks in an attempt to give them the last laugh. Who keeps the time? (I'm assuming a "local" time keeper who dowsn't have to be neutral?) Also when does it have to be stopped/started?
Canberra - there were a number of scrums/penalties/stoppages in the last 5 minutes. I was there and the clock never stopped. With 1 minute something to go we were training and there was a scrum (our feed.) The Raiders took a minute to pack the scrum and we ended up with 10 seconds to score a try on our last play. We had momentum and would have had "a shot" if they had stopped the clock, giving us 1 minute to run 60-70m. (Not saying we would have won, but they denied us a last ditch attempt by not stopping the clock.)
Cowboys... during the last 2 minutes there were a LOT of stoppages. For every stoppage the clock stopped and it was slooooow to start. On a number of occasions I noticed that after scrums the clock would not be ticking until after the 1st/2nd tackle. This gave the cowboys extra time to prepare themselves and have a damn good shot at scoring a last minute try. To me this was compounded when we started playing rugby union and the ref gave the Cowboys a "last play" after the 80 minute mark. I think this was due to an "offside" or something but really... if they'd started the clock earlier, te Cowboys would have been rushed, and wouldn't have gotten that close.
---
Am I tripping? I just get the feeling that small-town local teams are using the clock to their advantage. If we're good enough (like last night) then it doesn't matter and I'm proud of our boys for holding their heads high in AWFUL conditons. Still... it grinds my gears seeing inconsistency with the clock.
Canberra - there were a number of scrums/penalties/stoppages in the last 5 minutes. I was there and the clock never stopped. With 1 minute something to go we were training and there was a scrum (our feed.) The Raiders took a minute to pack the scrum and we ended up with 10 seconds to score a try on our last play. We had momentum and would have had "a shot" if they had stopped the clock, giving us 1 minute to run 60-70m. (Not saying we would have won, but they denied us a last ditch attempt by not stopping the clock.)
Cowboys... during the last 2 minutes there were a LOT of stoppages. For every stoppage the clock stopped and it was slooooow to start. On a number of occasions I noticed that after scrums the clock would not be ticking until after the 1st/2nd tackle. This gave the cowboys extra time to prepare themselves and have a damn good shot at scoring a last minute try. To me this was compounded when we started playing rugby union and the ref gave the Cowboys a "last play" after the 80 minute mark. I think this was due to an "offside" or something but really... if they'd started the clock earlier, te Cowboys would have been rushed, and wouldn't have gotten that close.
---
Am I tripping? I just get the feeling that small-town local teams are using the clock to their advantage. If we're good enough (like last night) then it doesn't matter and I'm proud of our boys for holding their heads high in AWFUL conditons. Still... it grinds my gears seeing inconsistency with the clock.




Comment