Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Five foes forge coalition set to ensure financial viability of clubs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Five foes forge coalition set to ensure financial viability of clubs

    Link: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/l...411-1wsax.html

    April 12, 2012
    Glenn Jackson


    IT'S the NRL's version of the supergroup: five Sydney clubs who have cast aside decades of animosity to join forces, pledging to work together rather than against each other.

    South Sydney, Canterbury-Bankstown, Sydney Roosters, St George Illawarra and Wests Tigers have formed a coalition aimed at combining their ideas and resources to raise attendances and ensure they are more financially viable into the future.

    It began as a meeting last Monday week involving the chief executives of four of the clubs at the renovated Belmore offices of the Bulldogs. It continued on Tuesday when marketing and sponsorship staff of all five clubs met at the Rabbitohs' Redfern headquarters.

    While being opponents on the field, the five clubs see themselves as similar businesses with similar goals in a difficult financial climate. The Rabbitohs and the Bulldogs play out of ANZ Stadium while the Roosters and the Tigers - the latter to a lesser extent - play out of Allianz Stadium. The Dragons have one of the most marketable brands in the competition.

    ''This is something we should have done a lot earlier,'' Souths boss Shane Richardson said.

    The five clubs aim to share ideas about attendances, membership, and have even raised the prospect of sharing sponsorships. The group discussed ways of attracting sponsors who will be willing to purchase jersey sponsorship or on-ground signage across all five clubs, rather than just one. ''It's five-times the exposure [for the sponsor],'' Richardson said.

    ''In this particular case, we wanted to be proactive. There's a whole gamut of things we can be talking about, structure of staff, different ways to improve attendances, the way we spend our money. It's about best practices.''

    The idea of the Rabbitohs and the Roosters, bitter enemies since 1908, joining together is significant in itself. ''The reality is, there's always rivalry,'' Richardson said. ''While on the field, they're going to try to bash each other, as businesses, we're very similar. For the game's sake, it's a matter of trying to make sure we all survive. We're all rivals, but we want to make our businesses better. Rather than whingeing and whining about our problems, we're doing something positive about it.''

    Richardson was cast as a villain last week after suggesting all nine Sydney clubs should play out of ANZ and Allianz stadiums, but the fact remains his comments prompted debate in the subject. While his extreme stadium policy might not be adopted, even a compromise would net the clubs extra money.

    Richardson has stated that attendances, which have been down on last year's figures, was the most important issue in the code. The group discussed how tomorrow night's Carlton and Collingwood AFL match will be played in front of a massive crowd at the MCG, with a largely even split of supporters even though it will be Carlton's home contest. The sentiment from the group was that the days of not wanting opposition supporters to turn up in order to add to home-ground advantage was ''something from 20 years ago''.

    ''The game's at an exciting stage,'' Roosters chief executive Steve Noyce said. ''But commercially there are some challenges for all sports in Australia. We'll share some ideas and discuss what we can do as a collective group.''

    Noyce said rather than excluding the other Sydney teams, any of the other clubs in the competition were welcome to use ideas from the brainstorm. He said the group had forwarded information from the meeting to ARLC officials. ''There's nothing stopping all 16 clubs looking at new ideas,'' he said.

    Bulldogs chief executive Todd Greenberg added: ''It's always good to have collaborative discussions surrounding common challenges … there are numerous opportunities off the field to continue to work together.''





    Finally something positive and smart happening to ensure the clubs have more of a say. It's something I've advocated for years, this loose sort of partnership between clubs, especially the Sydney ones. Good to see we are being Pro-Active at the highest levels.



    The FlogPen .

    You know it makes sense.

  • #2
    I remember the last Tom Baker Dr Who Serial called Logopolis had the Doctor teaming up with the Master to save the universe. The Master ended up betraying the Doctor and critically injuring him so he needed to regenerate.

    Barring the Time Lord stuff, I believe getting into partnership with Souths and it's board will be a grave mistake. My first reaction to all things instigated or created by Richardson is to run away very quickly.

    Comment


    • #3
      please expand our competition

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by John View Post
        I remember the last Tom Baker Dr Who Serial called Logopolis had the Doctor teaming up with the Master to save the universe. The Master ended up betraying the Doctor and critically injuring him so he needed to regenerate.

        Barring the Time Lord stuff, I believe getting into partnership with Souths and it's board will be a grave mistake. My first reaction to all things instigated or created by Richardson is to run away very quickly.
        who's the Adric of the group - Wests?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by John View Post
          I remember the last Tom Baker Dr Who Serial called Logopolis had the Doctor teaming up with the Master to save the universe. The Master ended up betraying the Doctor and critically injuring him so he needed to regenerate.

          Barring the Time Lord stuff, I believe getting into partnership with Souths and it's board will be a grave mistake. My first reaction to all things instigated or created by Richardson is to run away very quickly.
          This will shock you John but I disagree. This is a good idea imo. If the clubs can pool resources, advertising, reduce overheads, share common facitlities even sponsors it can only be a good thing. We'll still try and steal good players off each other and dump the bad ones - case in point your beloved Braith to the Tigpies. But shared goals of getting full stadiums, more sponsorship money and better membership packages for fans can only be a good thing.

          That and this coalition paves the way for full blown mergers in the future.

          Chook.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Comrade View Post
            who's the Adric of the group - Wests?
            Whiny, petulant, obnoxious and about to be blown up, that's a fine analogy.

            Comment


            • #7
              As much as it seems to be sleeping with the enemy, I think it will be a good thing.
              Times change & sometimes drastic measures are needed to grow, or even survive.
              The biggest problem I foresee is that there will always be the attitude of "but that decision favours your club more than mine ".
              If they can get past that, it should work.

              Comment


              • #8
                Jury is out for me. It could lead to another question mark on the integrity of results in certain instances.

                For example if we are coming 9th going into the last round and the Tigers are coming 12th with no chance of making the 8, it would be in a combined sponsors best interest to get the Roosters into the 8 - the same combine sponsor that is paying the Tigers bills. It is no different to News Ltd owning multiple clubs (actually its a much looser arrangement), however I have always been uncomfortable with that as well.

                Comment


                • #9
                  We need to be destroying souths & taking everything they have for ourselves, not helping them grow. I think its not a bad idea with the other clubs though

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Jarlicho View Post
                    We need to be destroying souths & taking everything they have for ourselves, not helping them grow. I think its not a bad idea with the other clubs though
                    The last time we were friendly with Souffs, they redistributed the boundary lines and stole a slice of our juniors.

                    I think this coalition is most likely a good idea (in theory anyway), but I'd still be a little wary bout sleeping with the enemy !

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Hawkeye View Post
                      The last time we were friendly with Souffs, they redistributed the boundary lines and stole a slice of our juniors.

                      I think this coalition is most likely a good idea (in theory anyway), but I'd still be a little wary bout sleeping with the enemy !
                      Remember The Godfather said "keep your friends close but your enemies closer".

                      IMO the games been taken from the Sydney sides and been handed to the regional teams. Time we at least think as a whole, Sydney, before we lose the TRUE heartland of our game.

                      A good example would be the reserve grade in Sydney. It's underfunded and poorly run and provides a massive disadvantage to the Sydney teams in comparison to the QLD cup.

                      If we try and fix just one thing, like our lower grade structures, IMO That would make any ideal sharing a worthwhile proposition.



                      The FlogPen .

                      You know it makes sense.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Lemon_Goat View Post
                        please expand our competition
                        Good post there you Lemon Goat.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by stsae View Post
                          Remember The Godfather said "keep your friends close but your enemies closer".
                          My personal favorite line from that movie was "Shane Richardson sleeps with the whales"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by John View Post
                            I remember the last Tom Baker Dr Who Serial called Logopolis had the Doctor teaming up with the Master to save the universe. The Master ended up betraying the Doctor and critically injuring him so he needed to regenerate.

                            Barring the Time Lord stuff, I believe getting into partnership with Souths and it's board will be a grave mistake. My first reaction to all things instigated or created by Richardson is to run away very quickly.
                            i trust richardson as far as i could throw him - maybe its the greek connection of pappas and politis wanting to join forces.the thought of it makes me puke

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X