Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Zzzz @ Annesley

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Zzzz @ Annesley

    Just listened to Annesley. My take-aways were...

    - 'I am not mentioning NAS or Munster here!!! We are just being theoretical!!! But... we're allowed to send people letters saying "no charges have been laid but next time you do a grade 1, it'll be a grade 2"'. Code: NAS and Munster have received such letters (possibly) and they mean jack all.

    - Souffs scammed the HIA rules and got away with it. I'm not a doctor so am not suggesting there were or were not head injuries though!!!

    Lame.
    Last edited by ism22; 08-29-2022, 05:40 PM.

  • #2
    Fark Annasley and fark the NRL

    Sometimes i wish I didn't love our Roosters so much so I could be done with the sport and stop spending my hard earned on the game. I love the Roosters too much for that to happen...but fark it crosses my mind at times

    Comment


    • #3
      i thought his defence of not charging kaufusi was fair enough - it was pretty much the same tackle style as lindsay's but he doesn't catch tauks' leg between his own body and the ground.
      he said he wouldn't have had a problem if munster had been charged for the hit on sammy but it was close and he didn't have a problem with him not being charged. from memory we didn't get a penalty?!
      if he said anything about jwh's sin binning i missed it but it seems silly that someone can be binned for an action which isn't going to smash someone's face while others don't get sin binned for actions that have smashed teeth

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by zac View Post
        i thought his defence of not charging kaufusi was fair enough - it was pretty much the same tackle style as lindsay's but he doesn't catch tauks' leg between his own body and the ground.
        he said he wouldn't have had a problem if munster had been charged for the hit on sammy but it was close and he didn't have a problem with him not being charged. from memory we didn't get a penalty?!
        if he said anything about jwh's sin binning i missed it but it seems silly that someone can be binned for an action which isn't going to smash someone's face while others don't get sin binned for actions that have smashed teeth
        The MRC is fundamentally flawed. A group of individuals review every game every week, you think they'd have it right by now, but still choose to ignore instances of blatant foul play. I am unsure whether so many anomalies exist when reviewing the other club's games, however I don't see how all other fans think the roosters get a leg up in all their games. Subconscious bias I suppose.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by zac View Post
          i thought his defence of not charging kaufusi was fair enough - it was pretty much the same tackle style as lindsay's but he doesn't catch tauks' leg between his own body and the ground.
          he said he wouldn't have had a problem if munster had been charged for the hit on sammy but it was close and he didn't have a problem with him not being charged. from memory we didn't get a penalty?!
          if he said anything about jwh's sin binning i missed it but it seems silly that someone can be binned for an action which isn't going to smash someone's face while others don't get sin binned for actions that have smashed teeth
          That right there is just gaslighting. What was "close" about it.

          Anus guy is a pathetic lying weasel whose job is to try to defend the indefendible. We all saw it, the journos saw it and called it out.


          Comment


          • #6
            Just goes to show how much nein and news ltd have the power to run the game their way.
            1911 1912 1913 1923 1935 1936 1937 1940 1945 1974 1975 2002 2013 2018 2019 2020

            Comment


            • #7
              I wonder whether its time to bring back 2 on field refs. One clearly isn't enough. The bunker is a joke and the MRC is a disgrace

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Easts75 View Post
                Fark Annasley and fark the NRL

                Sometimes i wish I didn't love our Roosters so much so I could be done with the sport and stop spending my hard earned on the game. I love the Roosters too much for that to happen...but fark it crosses my mind at times
                same here!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by SupermanSupportsEasts4Eva View Post
                  I wonder whether its time to bring back 2 on field refs. One clearly isn't enough. The bunker is a joke and the MRC is a disgrace
                  The game is too quick for one ref, it was introduced as a cost cutting measure by vlandys during covid but I agree let's go back to two.
                  Pathetic from Annesley saying insufficient force from Munsters elbow on Sam's head, its a cop out.
                  Instead of applauding Robbos don't lay down stance the officials and hierarchy encourage players to flop out of water like a dead fish to extract a penalty and get opposition players sin binned or placed on report.
                  Im glad Payten highlighted souths HIA one legged stork test everytime they have to defend a set from a restart near their line, strangely never seems to happen when they are on the attack.
                  One would think as a game and example for young players league headquarters would prefer the roosters way instead of rewarding devious tactics but what would I know.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X