Sam Walker - Can we all agree...

[bondi.boy]

"South's were far too good for the Roosters, beating them by 10 points"

lol

One of South's tries should never have been allowed...one of their 2 dummy runners knocked Keary over, preventing him from getting across to defend.
Keary was on the ground with his arm in the air protesting obstruction..ignored he was.
They'll probably make a 26-16 T shirt now.

We lost to Souths because we never had enough big players on our right side to smash Mitchell, Gagai and Walker every time they got the ball.
We know Mitchell will be playing an extra left centre, short pass to Walker running at pace when he gets the ball...they do it all the time.

Warriors centre Pompey ...190cm 101kg ran all over the Raiders backs...unstoppable.
He'll run all over Sam Walker too unless we get forwards out right to stop him.
My guess in the Warriors will be running their 120kg, 120kg 118kg, 116kg etc forwards at our line where our smaller players are defending...all night.

[Bahrain Rooster]

Bondi.boy, they were too good for us, that’s it. The score line flattered us to be completely honest. We were very flat from the word go. We move on to this week where hopefully there will be an improved performance.

[Bondicigar]

We won't win nothing with Hutch as a starting 6 or 7 , so why not use the full season to allow Walker to get a head start on his NRL career .
Same goes for Suali, if you are good enough, you are old enough.
All these solutions tossed up around fixing our halves are useless unless our forward pack can get back to dominating the middle again.

[Spirit of 66]

Warriors centre Pompey ...190cm 101kg ran all over the Raiders backs...unstoppable.

The Warriors got him from us too.

[Mickie Lane]

Sammy boy will be no different to any other player.
If he isn’t as good as what Cronk was at the end of his stint with the Chooks in his first game then Sam will be criticised on here. The expectations that people already have on Sam are too high. He’s hardly played against men & is only 79kg so he is going to miss tackles & miss read defense & once that happens he will be criticised on here.

[King Salvo]

Nice idea like no more wars or poverty or Souffs Vermin premierships but the Statler and Waldorfs that's a different matter. - be one of a growing number of whipping boys if he doesn't work out as sure as the sun rises and sets.

[The Skeez]

"South's were far too good for the Roosters, beating them by 10 points"

lol

They'll probably make a 26-16 T shirt now.

Lol. Still got it b.b

[Jacks Fur Coat]

Lol. Still got it b.b

I apologise The Skeez.

[Roosterfarian]

Who gives a flying **** if people come on here to criticise a player. It’s a public forum for ****s sake. People can say whatever the **** they want on here as long as it’s not derogatory or libel.

Do you honestly think the players or officials give a toss about what we think of their performance? If someone has a go at a player, there is a high chance he has had a stinker of a game or two or three.

[Thirteen]

The Warriors got him from us too.

And we originally got him from them.

[Lydon]

Who gives a flying **** if people come on here to criticise a player. It’s a public forum for ****s sake. People can say whatever the **** they want on here as long as it’s not derogatory or libel.

Do you honestly think the players or officials give a toss about what we think of their performance? If someone has a go at a player, there is a high chance he has had a stinker of a game or two or three.

Well said mun..

[Cockadoodledoo]

Who gives a flying **** if people come on here to criticise a player. It’s a public forum for ****s sake. People can say whatever the **** they want on here as long as it’s not derogatory or libel.

Do you honestly think the players or officials give a toss about what we think of their performance? If someone has a go at a player, there is a high chance he has had a stinker of a game or two or three.

Snowflakes, who want to cancel our right to give an opinion because it doesn't match up with theirs and they aren't intelligent enough to respond without resorting to attacking the poster.

[Lydon]

Snowflakes, who want to cancel our right to give an opinion because it doesn't match up with theirs and they aren't intelligent enough to respond without resorting to attacking the poster.

Always agreed with you mate, plenty more supporters on here are on the same page

[bondi.boy]

We won't win nothing with Hutch as a starting 6 or 7 , so why not use the full season to allow Walker to get a head start on his NRL career .
Same goes for Suali, if you are good enough, you are old enough.
All these solutions tossed up around fixing our halves are useless unless our forward pack can get back to dominating the middle again.

I would play Hutch hooker, he throws good passes from dummy half.

[King Salvo]

There maybe underlying repressed issues from childhood/school /workplace in why people feel they need to criticise others -may have suffered constant criticism which was quite hurtful and use the criticism of others as some sort of defence mechanism -may also be signs of an inferiority complex too.

According to Health Practitioners and relevant research and studies people with inferiority complexes display certain behavioural patterns in their social interactions such as on this website for instance.

Signs of an Inferiority complex include some of the following

• They try to make you feel insecure.
• They constantly seek validation from others.
• They always talk about their achievements.
• They complain a lot.
• They're overly sensitive to criticism.
• They regularly criticise others.
• They have frequent mood swings.
• They often withdraw from social situations.