bondi boy needs 10 in the bin

[Bruce Pickett]

I wonder if he's Russell Crowe.
You know, submerging yourself into the character and all that method acting bullsheet.

The Phonechucker would have plenty of time on his hands atm.

[stringaz]

Just don't read it.

The block feature works too. Like an online mute button.

[Thirteen]

I like BB. I think he can be forgiven for all the non-footy comments seeing that there is no footy. But once the footy starts if he gets into his own agenda than ban him.

[Jacks Fur Coat]

i think we need clarification from admin.

Is it okay to continuously post in the Sydney Roosters Discussion matters which have nothing to do with the Sydney Roosters? I'm not talking about police state supervision of every post, there's got to be some leeway, but is it okay if the Sydney Roosters Discussion forum is hijacked by politics?

If that's okay, then we don't need the Off-Topic Chat Forum. Or, to put it another way, if we have an Off-Topic Chat Forum - that is the place for non-footy related posts.

Footy fans are passionate and it's inevitable that some of those fans will be passionate about politics. No problem with that, but i don't think a sports forum is the place to get on your political soap box.

The Sydney Roosters Discussion forum should be a place where we're united by our support for the roosters, not divided by politics.

You seem like the schoolyard snitch today.

For someone so anti "agenda" you appear to have one of your own here.

You are not silly enough to think there wouldn't be the usual abusive pIle-on from familiar suspects after creating this thread, so congrats.

We may as well get real and admit it's about content bias, not how Rooster relevant it is or not.

E.g. if BBs mantra was moreso say.... climate change activism...would you still be calling him out?

[zac]

You seem like the schoolyard snitch today.

For someone so anti "agenda" you appear to have one of your own here.

You are not silly enough to think there wouldn't be the usual abusive pIle-on from familiar suspects after creating this thread, so congrats.

We may as well get real and admit it's about content bias, not how Rooster relevant it is or not.

E.g. if BBs mantra was moreso say.... climate change activism...would you still be calling him out?

no, have to disagree with you there, jfc. my comments were about relevance to the roosters. I genuinely believe that partisan politics doesn't have a place in this part of the forum.

from memory I questioned 61's preoccupation with politics a while back, so I'll have to disagree with you on that one as well!

and you're holding me responsible for the unnecessary abuse of bb? I've been one of his biggest supporters on this site.

got the trifecta today, mate.

[bondi.boy]

Coronavirus thread.
89 pages...1334 posts.
I started the thread. I did not make all those posts and fill up all those pages.
In my mind it just went where it went.

[Jacks Fur Coat]

no, have to disagree with you there, jfc. my comments were about relevance to the roosters. I genuinely believe that partisan politics doesn't have a place in this part of the forum.

from memory I questioned 61's preoccupation with politics a while back, so I'll have to disagree with you on that one as well!

and you're holding me responsible for the unnecessary abuse of bb? I've been one of his biggest supporters on this site.

got the trifecta today, mate.

You're one of his biggest supporters...yet you want him banned?

Cripes...with friends like you, who needs enemies.

[Seventy Five]

While there is no footy on, who really cares where it is posted. If BB wasn’t here, there would be very little chat going on, like easts75 said, after a few lines if you don’t like it, let it go and move on.

whether BB is actually 75, or 18, his posts are articulated, never degrading to other posters, and cops the abuse without worry, some of his posts shit me to tears, but I do get enjoyment from the reactions.

would be an interesting poll to see if he should get a stint on the sidelines.

What he said.

[Random Rooster]

You seem like the schoolyard snitch today.

For someone so anti "agenda" you appear to have one of your own here.

You are not silly enough to think there wouldn't be the usual abusive pIle-on from familiar suspects after creating this thread, so congrats.

We may as well get real and admit it's about content bias, not how Rooster relevant it is or not.

E.g. if BBs mantra was moreso say.... climate change activism...would you still be calling him out?

Hey Random Rooster if you don't want others to read your rubbish messages to BB, send them privately. Spare us all.

Good time to take some of your own advice!

Lets take it to the off-topic section shall we?

[Old Man Rooster]

You seem like the schoolyard snitch today.

For someone so anti "agenda" you appear to have one of your own here.

You are not silly enough to think there wouldn't be the usual abusive pIle-on from familiar suspects after creating this thread, so congrats.

We may as well get real and admit it's about content bias, not how Rooster relevant it is or not.

E.g. if BBs mantra was moreso say.... climate change activism...would you still be calling him out?

Pff this farking guy. Bondi Boy is a troll but sadly Simple Jack is all too real.

[zac]

You're one of his biggest supporters...yet you want him banned?

Cripes...with friends like you, who needs enemies.

don't worry i'd be after you too if you ever strayed.

[bondi.boy]

i didn't start this thread with my name up in lghts in it either.

[Mickie Lane]

i didn't start this thread with my name up in lghts in it either.

What was dinner tonight bb?

[bondi.boy]

What was dinner tonight bb?

An old friend.
No that's not correct, that's the guy in Silence of the Lambs I'm waiting for to be on GEM at 8.40 or so tonite.

[Mickie Lane]

An old friend.
No that's not correct, that's the guy in Silence of the Lambs I'm waiting for to be on GEM at 8.40 or so tonite.

Ah okay
Will you & Mrs bb be having a beverage whilst watching Silence of the Lambs?