Inglis Crusher on Lafai.....

[The Axe]

Well here we are the morning after.

ch Nein sports shows will determine if inglarse charged and be interested to see if burgearse schlong cam incident mentioned.

greenturd will reference sentiment analysis in his directions to MRC and integrity unit.

seems after comparing the two crusher incidents, Johns response is what drove the emotion. Of course no such outrage re his two chums, Sammie boy and Australia’s next captain and next Queenslander immortal in wait.

uncle nick needs to be proactive with nrl as should dogs. Nick should also have influential chat with Johns. We don’t need him with Cronk potentially grooming his successor and moving into coaching role

[bondi.boy]

We don't need him, maybe it's time to wave him goodbye.

[The Axe]

We don't need him, maybe it's time to wave him goodbye.

I used to be a Johns supporter around our club. No longer.

there are no rules re nrl. The media works to agendas and the nrl limps from incident to incident. Being reactive and inconsistent seems a deliberate nrl strategy to drive agendas

[Kelby]

Grade 1 minimum.

[Bowzy]

Will be funny to see what Tallis has to say about it today. Last week he absolutely gave it to Latrell saying he should be suspended for 3 weeks because it was the same as chambers. I thought the Inglis one was worse than Latrells

[Jacks Fur Coat]

Guys, Inglis is a protected species with the hierarchy and media and has been for a long time.

They won't touch him.

[The Sack]

The media seem to have forgotten that Inglis gave his missus a clip across the ear back in the day.

[Nathan Aboud]

Braith is starting to really bug me as a commentator. It's bad enough he can't construct grammatically correct sentences, but his opinion of the game is incorrect more often than not.

He is really getting to me too... I really think he should be barred from any of our functions or team reunions they may hold because he has one once said one nice thing or complemented our team structure for at least 3 years now.

I saw enough last night that even with Napa and Mitchell out that Souths won't ne that much of a threat as both teams were very woeful in attack last night..

[theGman]

Well, this has got me curious. Turns out the match review committee that made a decision on Latrell consisted of;

• Sean Garlick,
• Tony Puletua,
• Bob Lindner

"The three-man panel of ex-players Sean Garlick, Tony Puletua, Bob Lindner took 12 minutes to deliver their verdict, with the fact Mitchell's feet left the ground in tackling Dugan critical to the grade 1 dangerous contact with the head/neck charge standing."

Can i also point out that Greenturd went out of his way to be present at the judiciary hearing. Latrell had Buckley's.
Mr Influential must be taking a leaf out of The Godfather movies.

[TDK]

Grade 1 minimum.

Agree but he has no carry over points which was confirmed on radio this morning.

[stephenj]

the rules only apply if your a pesky rooster with the ability to upset the plans of the stays quo! gi wont hardly get looked at let alone in slow motion.

[RoosterChick]

Freddy on the Footy Show said GIs crusher not as bad as Latrells. WTF. Will probably get a Grade 1 and still play next week.

[Lydon]

Freddy on the Footy Show said GIs crusher not as bad as Latrells. WTF. Will probably get a Grade 1 and still play next week.

I also heard it and can’t believe the stupidity,it looked worse in my eyes..

Dugan’s head fell in between and through Latrell’s arms whereas Lafai’s head got jammed under Inglis torso..

[Vasco]

He won’t be charged.

It’s barely even being mentioned in the press, whereas Latrell had multiple articles in each paper calling for a suspension before the game was even over.

cody Walker is the person who should be suspended though. Made clear contact with the ref in a very aggressive manner when lashing out after his penalty. Moa got suspended for touching a ref on the shoulder while sharing a joke with him at a scrum.

Agreed about Walker but nothing will happen because what you mentioned that happened to Latrell has not happened to Walker.

It's a farce. Like most things in this game

[roosterchook]

They’ve made the rules such that any interpretation can be made to suit any agenda so judiciary decisions depend largely on who it is and which team not so much the incident itself. That explains the inconsistency.