Originally posted by Moose
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Inglis Crusher on Lafai.....
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dice View PostAs someone else pointed out, Inglis has no carryover points. Won't miss a game if charged.Originally posted by jism
I saw Reynolds crying in front of me after the game and yelled out 'WHAT ARE YOU CRYING ABOUT?!?!? GO SAY SORRY TO COOPER YOU GRUB!!!' He looked up at me with a pretty broken looking face.
Comment
-
so does that mean you can apply as much pressure on the back of someones neck now as long as your feet dont leave the ground. thats just utter shiteLast edited by RoosterFanNZ; 09-16-2018, 01:57 AM.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flipper Hands View PostWell, this has got me curious. Turns out the match review committee that made a decision on Latrell consisted of;- Sean Garlick,
- Tony Puletua,
- Bob Lindner
"The three-man panel of ex-players Sean Garlick, Tony Puletua, Bob Lindner took 12 minutes to deliver their verdict, with the fact Mitchell's feet left the ground in tackling Dugan critical to the grade 1 dangerous contact with the head/neck charge standing."
I'm not convinced Inglis will be charged now. They may consider that a penalty was enough.
Comment
-
He won’t be charged.
It’s barely even being mentioned in the press, whereas Latrell had multiple articles in each paper calling for a suspension before the game was even over.
cody Walker is the person who should be suspended though. Made clear contact with the ref in a very aggressive manner when lashing out after his penalty. Moa got suspended for touching a ref on the shoulder while sharing a joke with him at a scrum.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Some elsewhere are saying that because Ingliss didn't drop his legs to add more impact therefore it's not as bad as Mitchells incident but really it should be how much force is applied to the neck.in Mitchells case Dugan's head went thru Mitchells shoulder. Ingliss's chest pushes Lafais head forward and keeps going and going till Lafai hits his own chest...That to me is far worse...And what about Manu...did he have some carry over points when he was given a week for a crusher? The most ridiculous part of this type of incident is that when Cleary does it on Mitchell and he is stretchered off the game, Nathan cops zero.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flipper Hands View PostWell, this has got me curious. Turns out the match review committee that made a decision on Latrell consisted of;- Sean Garlick,
- Tony Puletua,
- Bob Lindner
"The three-man panel of ex-players Sean Garlick, Tony Puletua, Bob Lindner took 12 minutes to deliver their verdict, with the fact Mitchell's feet left the ground in tackling Dugan critical to the grade 1 dangerous contact with the head/neck charge standing."
I'm not convinced Inglis will be charged now. They may consider that a penalty was enough.
- 3 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spirit of 66 View Post
Anyone else detect the slight scent of a conflict of interest with Sean Garlick’s pie company logo displayed on the shirts of Souths’ trainers?
Comment
Comment