Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DT at it again

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by bondi-boy View Post
    Party trick consenting stupidity is not against the law.

    Did the cops do anything?
    No.

    Did the guy make a complaint to the cops?
    No.

    Was TC charged with anything?
    No.

    Why not?
    Because my guess is the 'victim' volunteered....mates skylarking!...NYE wasn't it?
    Not everything is about Government Law

    Just becauseNo one was charged, no complaint was made and no one was hurt, does not take away from the stupidity of the act, and for a person with his reputation and history, these things get highlighted.

    now it comes back to the question, which you have not specifically answered, how many chances does Todd get??? how many times must he break promises or do something stupid before he is HELD ACCOUNTABLE ???

    Delecto Oriens est odio Meridianus
    To love Easts is to hate Souffs

    Originally posted by Bill Shankley, Liverpool FC
    At a football club, there’s a holy trinity – the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don’t come into it. They are only there to sign the cheques.
    Originally posted by Andy Raymond Commentating Souffs V Manly 18/04/09
    The fireworks at the Easter show are making more noise than the crowd tonight

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by melon.... View Post
      Dude, stop trying to justify stupidity...surely you are taking the piss beyond anywhere anyone has before.
      Melon, this malaka has taken trolling to a new level.
      Gets his kicks 'living the dream' on internet forums.
      Yesterday he had issues with chicks doing yoga.
      Needs to get a life!

      If this malaka is for real, he has more issues than Craig Thompson!!!

      Comment


      • #48
        C.C., two things.

        1. No pee in Thomson. And allegedly according to his credit card no semen either (two and a half grand for a knocking shop bill!)

        2. I'll stop posting under Bondi Boy as it seems to be upsetting people.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by supermario View Post
          Not everything is about Government Law

          Just becauseNo one was charged, no complaint was made and no one was hurt, does not take away from the stupidity of the act, and for a person with his reputation and history, these things get highlighted.

          now it comes back to the question, which you have not specifically answered, how many chances does Todd get??? how many times must he break promises or do something stupid before he is HELD ACCOUNTABLE ???
          I did answer the question, in some thread here:

          "As many chances as those on the PS list now, and in the past get/got.

          Everything is about the law...and the courts.

          "All roads lead to lawyers".

          The 'victim' might have been the one who instigated the act, eh?


          I see it as a group of lads, possibly slightly intoxicated on NYE, skylarking at a party.

          Please don't try and tell me it's anything other than that.
          Last edited by bondi-boy; 08-24-2011, 11:30 AM.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by crikey chris View Post
            Melon, this malaka has taken trolling to a new level.
            Gets his kicks 'living the dream' on internet forums.
            Yesterday he had issues with chicks doing yoga.
            Needs to get a life!

            If this malaka is for real, he has more issues than Craig Thompson!!!
            Guess that's about me.
            I have issues with females being hired to do yoga like that in those tights at a footy recovery session, that's all.
            It's already led to trouble...as it was always going to do.

            And our club would be very unwise to even entertain the idea of doing a similar thing.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by crikey chris View Post
              Melon, this malaka has taken trolling to a new level.
              Gets his kicks 'living the dream' on internet forums.
              Yesterday he had issues with chicks doing yoga.
              Needs to get a life!

              If this malaka is for real, he has more issues than Craig Thompson!!!

              Troll?
              Troll?

              Why, because I don't agree with every opinion expressed here?

              Like my membership card?

              on the reverse it reads:

              'Thank you for supporting the official membership program for the Sydney Roosters'

              Roosters emblem on the LHS and easts emblem on the RHS.

              And on the front, pictures of Braith and Nate in action.
              Hmmm, another failed 'relationship'.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by bondi-boy View Post
                I did answer the question, in some thread here:

                "As many chances as those on the PS list now, and in the past get/got.

                Everything is about the law...and the courts.

                "All roads lead to lawyers".

                The 'victim' might have been the one who instigated the act, eh?


                I see it as a group of lads, possibly slightly intoxicated on NYE, skylarking at a party.

                Please don't try and tell me it's anything other than that.
                So you could screw your boss' wife, tell him he was a **** wit to his face, but because you haven't really broken any law he would have no grounds to sack you? Get real! Life is full of rules, but not all of them are policed in a court of law.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Headless Chook View Post
                  So you could screw your boss' wife, tell him he was a **** wit to his face, but because you haven't really broken any law he would have no grounds to sack you? Get real! Life is full of rules, but not all of them are policed in a court of law.
                  But that's not what happened in this particular 'trousers' case.

                  The 'anti social behaviour' that concerns the NRL tearing up contracts is all about the law...it said breaching club rules "little mistakes" Gallop said, did not concern it.
                  Now its changed its mind.
                  Another outrage.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by bondi-boy View Post
                    But that's not what happened in this particular 'trousers' case.

                    The 'anti social behaviour' that concerns the NRL tearing up contracts is all about the law...it said breaching club rules "little mistakes" Gallop said, did not concern it.
                    Now its changed its mind.
                    Another outrage.
                    The NRL don't tear up contract, they leave that to the club. Carney had his last contract terminated and was de-registered by the NRL for something which didn't get near the police or the courts last time.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Headless Chook View Post
                      The NRL don't tear up contract, they leave that to the club. Carney had his last contract terminated and was de-registered by the NRL for something which didn't get near the police or the courts last time.
                      Well you could've fooled me...it all looked highly illegal in my eyes...whether or not he was charged.

                      But since we hired him, knowing full well his past, I can't see that he's done so much wrong that we should be sacking him.

                      Gee, B Becky was busted 2 or 3 times drink-driving, with kids in her car on one of them, and she still has her job.
                      But then she's the partner of the big boss, that helps.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by bondi-boy View Post
                        Well you could've fooled me...it all looked highly illegal in my eyes...whether or not he was charged.

                        But since we hired him, knowing full well his past, I can't see that he's done so much wrong that we should be sacking him.

                        Gee, B Becky was busted 2 or 3 times drink-driving, with kids in her car on one of them, and she still has her job.
                        But then she's the partner of the big boss, that helps.
                        So setting a guys arse on fire is not illegal?????? You're mind boggling at times. You have two sets of rules, one for everybody else and another for your buddy Carney.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          It's not really, if the person agrees for or asks you to, light the match.

                          "Contributory negligence' or something...I'm a 'bush lawyer'.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X