Originally posted by Bigchook
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
No sin bin for shoulder charge to head in Eels v Knights game?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bigchook View Post
I agree with the second part. And not all. Roosters fans are hypocrites.. Just the ones on the pen! It's the same as people saying James Graham should have been sent for leading with the head in the grand final against south's. He broke burgess cheek bone and wasn't sent. People argued about it. But if south's had of lost that's all we would have heard.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johnny Brass View Post
Both Napa and James Graham head clashes were accidents in a heavy body contact sport . Who in there right mind would lead with their head it goes against your natural instincts to protect yourself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rented tracksuit View PostActually, that was also souffs bias like what had been going on all year. Why did Burgess not go to the HIA after that collision? These days, you could kiss a player on the cheek and he’s gotta go for an automatic 15 mins. Funny they left him out there after such a bad knock.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bigchook View Post
Because like most head clashes, they aren't seen until you look at a slow motion replay. And he got up straight after and played the ball. Yes he had a head knock but he demonstrated no signs of concussion. Hardly a sign of south's bias but believe what you want. Id be annoyed if every high tackle resulted in an HIA. Would ruin the game.FVCK CANCER
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pass the Ball View PostNapa, Graham and Myles all lead with their heads in tackles at times. The top of your head is the hardest part of your body isn't it?
When players lead with their head I think it is fair to say it is dangerous.....FVCK CANCER
Comment
Comment