Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No Charges

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • No Charges

    For Dylan or JWH.

    Both decisions were an embarrassment for the game.

    Just like the penalty where Milford turned 180 degrees to pass it into Dylan why was nowhere near the ruck.

    That was a massive stitch up.

  • #2
    Sutton should have been charged, preferably by Dylan Napa

    Comment


    • #3
      I can go on.

      I have only just gotten into the second half of the replay.

      The “play the ball” by Lodge where the crackdown was ignored.

      The “strip” on Matto in the first set after half time when there were clearly two in the tackle.

      And I think it will be only worse from here.

      At what stage does co-indicence become cheating?

      Comment


      • #4
        The first tackle of the game on Tedesco is something we get pinged for as a head high every second week. Teddy copped a few of them in the first half and Ferguson copped one too.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post
          I can go on.

          I have only just gotten into the second half of the replay.

          The “play the ball” by Lodge where the crackdown was ignored.

          The “strip” on Matto in the first set after half time when there were clearly two in the tackle.

          And I think it will be only worse from here.

          At what stage does co-indicence become cheating?
          Also I sear 4 knock on calls were knock back one went 5v feet backwards.
          If the club doesnt charge aftre sutton and get a result they should all be kicked in the ass ..stick up for ya players ya silly khunts.
          Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by The Brain View Post

            Also I sear 4 knock on calls were knock back one went 5v feet backwards.
            If the club doesnt charge aftre sutton and get a result they should all be kicked in the ass ..stick up for ya players ya silly khunts.
            Cronk gets the ball knocked out by a swinging arm, it goes backwards and is called a knock on.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post

              Cronk gets the ball knocked out by a swinging arm, it goes backwards and is called a knock on.
              Contrast that with Sutton's call on Isaako's knock on last week from the dropped kick reception if you saw it; where he ruled it went backwards.

              Interesting double standard.

              Comment


              • #8
                I'd also like to know why, in the heat of the moment, do the refs and video ref ALWAYS get it wrong on big hits by JWH and Napa?

                Not most of the time. But always.

                They'll put on a big hit and the opposition will come in and have a tantrum about it.

                The manic ref will then blow his whistle and ask the video ref to look at it, and then they blow and penalty and put it on report.

                And it never gets charged.

                Happened to JWH with his solid hit on Milford last night. Nothing in it. And then Napa.

                Every time these useless emotional ****s blow their load over these two and wrongly penalise them.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post
                  I can go on.

                  I have only just gotten into the second half of the replay.

                  The “play the ball” by Lodge where the crackdown was ignored.

                  The “strip” on Matto in the first set after half time when there were clearly two in the tackle.

                  And I think it will be only worse from here.

                  At what stage does co-indicence become cheating?
                  we copped some shit calls but so did brisbane. That play where there was a grubber and manu pushed su'a think it was before he got to the ball was a clear penalty or maybe even a penalty try if they looked at it, but they didnt. It went both ways. The 14 errors and 50 missed tackles was the reason behind our loss.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Tommy Smith View Post
                    I'd also like to know why, in the heat of the moment, do the refs and video ref ALWAYS get it wrong on big hits by JWH and Napa?

                    Not most of the time. But always.

                    They'll put on a big hit and the opposition will come in and have a tantrum about it.

                    The manic ref will then blow his whistle and ask the video ref to look at it, and then they blow and penalty and put it on report.

                    And it never gets charged.

                    Happened to JWH with his solid hit on Milford last night. Nothing in it. And then Napa.

                    Every time these useless emotional ****s blow their load over these two and wrongly penalise them.
                    If you want a penalty, just merely come running in the moment your team mate is hit hard. If you start jostling and pushing, the ref's always give a penalty assuming that there must be some illegality if everyone looks upset at the tackle !

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It's blatantly obvious and has been proved by the stat's in the paper last week that Sutton for whatever reason wants the Bronco's to win.
                      That pass by Milford should have been play on but the idiot called a penalty..Milford dropped the ball, he wasn't passing it to anyone.
                      So then Jake does the same thing and of course the idiot now has to rule a penalty..not that he wanted to.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Lol Getting a penalty for tackling too hard. NRL and refs just embarrassing. Way too many double standards

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I wonder if Napa will do any more of those low driving tackles that he has developed? He has been getting better at them and also more prolific.
                          Albeit wrongly, I sense the NRL will send a cease and desist letter to him regarding his use.
                          ..it’ll be interesting to see

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post
                            I can go on.

                            I have only just gotten into the second half of the replay.

                            The “play the ball” by Lodge where the crackdown was ignored.

                            The “strip” on Matto in the first set after half time when there were clearly two in the tackle.

                            And I think it will be only worse from here.

                            At what stage does co-indicence become cheating?
                            Should have saved Cronks money for having a go a the refs in the presser after each game this season.

                            Just watching out of blind hope and love for the chooks now (no tender unfortunately)

                            The horse has been bolting since at least 2014, no-one was held accountable for "there must be an investigation"

                            And since then, I believe the game management team have manipulated their way into having refs have more control over games to scratch the financial back of sports betting and other business interests.

                            Which gives rise to the inconsistency and no charges being laid after games once they have their result.

                            Someone said earlier that politis would be able to stop us being systematically rorted.

                            Should he call the cops?! Who would give a fark?

                            Look back to that semi between the bongos and titans a couple of years back. Absolutely disgraceful stitch up against their little sister Qld club.

                            It's not just the chooks who cop it.

                            And all the contraversy sells more papers and makes money for....??

                            Good ol Rupert, it's a rich man's war this NRL battleground with many sides involved.

                            As Mrs Hart would say, ei ei ei what a mess!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by The Brain View Post

                              Also I sear 4 knock on calls were knock back one went 5v feet backwards.
                              If the club doesnt charge aftre sutton and get a result they should all be kicked in the ass ..stick up for ya players ya silly khunts.
                              ex farking actly
                              Roosters For Ever

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X