The Fego disallowed try

[Cockadoodledoo]

Agreed Whilst we have been very poor this year Do not let that detract form some of the very poor or biased officiating we have had I have a feeling we are not wanted anywhere near the top of the table this year Should we continue our current form it wont be hnard for the referees to stop us as we are currently doing a good enough job ourselves

Ever wonder how we have a situation with Bernard Sutton as refs boss, his best mate Tony Archer in some newly created role overseeing all referee's and then Gerard Sutton and Chris Sutton as refs? Not to mention Gavin Badger (who last year arrived at Allianz to referee a Roosters match with his young son wearing a Souths hat. Imagine if an EPL ref arrived to a Liverpool match with his son wearing Everton gear) and his wife as a touch judge. Not hard to see how you can outcomes achieved with this lot.

[bondi.boy]

Who's Fego?

Part of the Lego family?

[The Lip]

Its never been a penalty for the attacking player to be tackled in the air, only the defending player

thanks Moose

[The Lip]

Learn the rules and stop wasting peoples time with ridiculous threads

So terribly sorry to waste your time - BTW you get the prize today.

[bondi.boy]

Attacking players can be tackled in the air.

Which is ridiculous.
No player should be allowed to be to be tackled in the air.

[Johnny Tobin]

Which is ridiculous.
No player should be allowed to be to be tackled in the air.

It is ridiculous. An attacking player can land on his head just as much as a defending one.

[Random Rooster]

I mentioned this in another thread. The rule was bought in because of the high risk of sustaining a serious injury ...... however its ok to take that risk if its the attacking player getting tackled mid air? Do they think the risk is lessened when its the attacking player getting tackled in the air? Do they think a kicker clearing the ball is more at risk when being tackled in the air? Fact is no matter what the circumstance its dangerous and shouldnt be allowed. First time a player gets tackled in the air in the act of scoring a try and gets tipped on his head or ends up with a serious injury then thats when they will change the rule.

[Random Rooster]

Whats with the video ref getting involved in the sin binning of Latrell? The ref with the whistle was right on it and made a quick call.....and a correct one at that. The video ref then some 30 seconds later tells him it was a professional foul....the Bulldogs player wasn't go to score a try whether Latrell got involved or not

[Andrew Walker]

I mentioned this in another thread. The rule was bought in because of the high risk of sustaining a serious injury ...... however its ok to take that risk if its the attacking player getting tackled mid air? Do they think the risk is lessened when its the attacking player getting tackled in the air? Do they think a kicker clearing the ball is more at risk when being tackled in the air? Fact is no matter what the circumstance its dangerous and shouldnt be allowed. First time a player gets tackled in the air in the act of scoring a try and gets tipped on his head or ends up with a serious injury then thats when they will change the rule.

Slater would have to be involved That is how many rule changes occur

[eddie]

So terribly sorry to waste your time - BTW you get the prize today.

Yep.
This "walker" wanker gets the pize for being the most gutless hypocrite on the forums.

[Andrew Walker]

Yep.
This "walker" wanker gets the pize for being the most gutless hypocrite on the forums.

Good onya Eddie Keep up the insults Hope they fill the void you have

[eddie]

Good onya Eddie Keep up the insults Hope they fill the void you have

LOL. Nothing can fill the void that used to be my effing life, but at least I apologise if I post something rude for no reason.
You're gutless.
I wish I could write you off as a complete idiot, but no one who supports the Roosters can be totally stupid.
But don't worry , I'm finished with you anyway. Waste of time .

bye bye.

[Andrew Walker]

LOL. Nothing can fill the void that used to be my effing life, but at least I apologise if I post something rude for no reason.
You're gutless.
I wish I could write you off as a complete idiot, but no one who supports the Roosters can be totally stupid.
But don't worry , I'm finished with you anyway. Waste of time .

bye bye.

Insult after insult Is all you come up with Eddie You can do much better

[stsae]

Did anyone else think Cronkite kicked a 40-20 last night???

I swear it was very close maybe his foot was on the line as he didn't blow up or anything but the Poxtel commentators made zero mention of it. Usually that would've been a replay-a-thon.

Also Blockhead Roach is he a numbskull or what??? I loved him as a player but he comes out with some whack shit often.

He kept banging on about how bad the game was cos there were no tries scored but played in the defensive 80s where such scorelines weren't that uncommon.

Id have thought he would've loved that game just for the forward battle and nostalga.

[Mickie Lane]

Was no try.