How wasn't Reynolds Sin Binned?

[Nathan Aboud]

He completely took Cronk out of the play and had no intention for going for the ball, so why wasn't it 10 in the bin?

[roosterchook]

I thought it should have been a penalty try because the penalty was for obstructing a try from being scored.

Blatant cheating and the refs let him off and also after 3 penalties at the goal line there was never a sin bin.

[The Thracian]

The way we were playing they could have had 3 in the bin and not scored

[The Axe]

The way they we refereeing if a penalty try was awarded they would refer it upstairs who would overrule

[bondi.boy]

He completely took Cronk out of the play and had no intention for going for the ball, so why wasn't it 10 in the bin?

He wore the red and green?

[Johnny Tobin]

That was a massive dive from Cronk.

[blooster]

Lucky to even get a Penalty for that.. Nothing in it.

[chopstiks]

If that's not a professional foul what is?

And now the coaches have outsmarted referees again

You have to laugh at the refs coming out all Gung ho we're taking back our game.

Now we have this situation where teams know they get at least 3 warnings on their line for offside, so it's in their best interests to risk it, be offside Stop the try.

As we saw last night, roosters 3 penalties no try, clock got run down, no souths sin bin. They prevailed, it's better to ride those dumb "3 warnings". The captain going over to have a chat and do his best Oscar performance apology sucks up more time, another ploy.
Last home game Roger did it when perenara gave 5 penalties, Roger says "sorry bro we're really trying".. "yeah I know bro i know" says Henry.

Farce.