Set up

[2026]

Beat up of epic proportions.

A representative from the RSPCA was on the radio today expressing his disappointment .New York and London media are all over it.

FFS!

[Thirteen]

I actually thought the dog was quite cute. I think she is a regular in the Chook Pen.

[Johnny.]

Some of the loons will say it's the Illuminate and the Rothschilds who set up Pearce.

[novice chook]

I actually thought the dog was quite cute. I think she is a regular in the Chook Pen.

Its the freaking dogs fault. If it would have been a moggie pearce would have been clawed and bitten before he had the thing on his lap and no harm done.

Ive no time for useless docile dogs. Id like to set my devil cat onto it. He do it more damage than pearce did.

[Guest]

I think he is talking about the groupie

[The Brain]

Mitchell Pearce was not set up and he is a grown man that needs to take responsibility for his actions. Only he is to blame for this situation.

I beg to differ ....Camera on way before some wank in hope of getting some thing and in the end did and was quick off the mark to make a buck ..knew exactly what he was getting and what he was going to do with it.
I did say and have said pearce is DUMB for falling into this and yes he is responsible for his actions.....was it bad not at all.
I am more curious as to what rights a person has in privacy .Surely some one can not film you secretly and then sell your imagine for profit ? I had this arguement with a saints mate yesterday im for he did the crime do the time thing and he is saying people can not film you in your private time with out permission....etc he went on defence of Pearce and I the opposite.
In the end Im no lawyer and I know jack shit but I would be curious on where you stand with privacy laws because if its that easy to make money following footballers around the place and filming them then I might start a new occupation.Knowing footy players I should make 60 grand a week.
Any lawyers in here ? I am curious about what rights people do have .
I would be chasing after the bloke that filmed it and teaching him a lesson too .
I would put my money on he is a dealer.
I would put my money on he has a connection with a reporter .

[Hawkeye]

Beat up of epic proportions.

A representative from the RSPCA was on the radio today expressing his disappointment .New York and London media are all over it.

FFS!

Funny thing is when Jarryd Hayne was first making a name in the NFL, whenever the commentators would say he's a 'rugby player', the local establishment were quick to correct and say 'its rugby league'.
Now when the overseas media refer to Mitchell Piss as 'rugby player peforms sexual act with dog' ...everyone is quite happy to leave it at that and not correct them !

[Spirit of 66]

I read that they wanted $40,000 from ACA for the video. Seems an easy way of making good money - bring a notorious, high-profile drunk back to your house and wait for his inevitable embarrassments. LIGHTS! CAMERA! ACTION!

[Chook]

If Pearce was targeted it's because he was viewed as too stupid to see it coming and would allow himself to be taken. Nothing but net.

Chook.

[Pass the Ball]

Yep - A certain reporter or referee spiked Pearce's drinks

A set-up for sure...

[Vasco]

Footy players need to know and trust the people they associate with.

This proves that they cannot trust randoms and sadly they pretty much just have to hang out with each other.

[redwhiteblue]

Mitchell Pearce was not set up and he is a grown man that needs to take responsibility for his actions. Only he is to blame for this situation.

So you don't think it's a low act to film someone in the public eye when they are truly at a low point and then sell the footage?

[Arties Pie]

Set up or not the MAN needs to take responsibility for his own actions, you guys are making excuses for him like he's some little teenage boy who was led astray, not his first infraction nor his last.

[milanja]

So you don't think it's a low act to film someone in the public eye when they are truly at a low point and then sell the footage?

Its low, but apparently not illegal, if you are not a mate of his and can pocket quick cash, some people will take advantage of that. Current affairs do it every night to unsuspecting people.

[The Brain]

Im not sticking up for Pearce .Im happy enough if the club punts him .I have a lot of NRL debates on Footy players discipline and the NRL has to be hard and consistent . They have proven not to be .
Surely every human has privacy laws applicable to them .
I mean Ive seen celebrities cop it ---and the smart ones who have taken these rags to court over pictures and videos have come out in front.
I have seen many things with footy players in front of me and my morales said not my business.Couldve easily pulled out camera several times.
In the end its all thebplayers fault involved. They had their fun all ran smoothly and all supposedly were sent home on at the clubs expense and a couple of morons have jumped bail so to speak .So the Players all involved are responsible and Pearce been their Captain and leader of the group has to feel the clubs wrath ,no doubt about it.
A lot of things could be considered in this -is the video edited was he baited .If I was the club I would still go after the Steven Spielberg and hunt the priickk down.