Had a great game for newtown against tigers, He'd be geat inside justin carney....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Kane Linnet
Collapse
X
-
Alot better than graham, thats forsure !!!
Delecto Oriens est odio Meridianus
To love Easts is to hate Souffs
Originally posted by Bill Shankley, Liverpool FCAt a football club, there’s a holy trinity – the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don’t come into it. They are only there to sign the cheques.Originally posted by Andy Raymond Commentating Souffs V Manly 18/04/09The fireworks at the Easter show are making more noise than the crowd tonight
-
I'll start by saying I've given this much thought. The solution is far from perfect but better than the option of playing Anasta at 5/8 or 2nd row.
I believe we may have a solution for Anasta. The facts so far:
1. Smith isn't going to drop him this year
2. Capable of tackling, yet not racking up tackle counts.
3. He is not contributing sufficiently to be a forward. Put him in the forwards and we lose our balance
4. Stop gap at 5/8 until Carney returns
With all this said, why not move Anasta to Centre, move Maubs back to the pack. Bring back Carney when fit; not when rehabilitated. Hopefully this will be sooner rather than later.
Benefits of Anasta in centres:
1. He is capable of 6 tackles a match
2. Can use his ball playing skills to set up his winger/fullback, allowing Mini to stay out of the attacking line
3. Can run at the opposition backs; not the forwards, thereby allowing him the confidence to take on the line again
4. He must be faster than Maubs
5. He isn't capable of playing anywhere else
Appreciate thoughts....Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Axe View PostI'll start by saying I've given this much thought. The solution is far from perfect but better than the option of playing Anasta at 5/8 or 2nd row.
I believe we may have a solution for Anasta. The facts so far:
1. Smith isn't going to drop him this year
2. Capable of tackling, yet not racking up tackle counts.
3. He is not contributing sufficiently to be a forward. Put him in the forwards and we lose our balance
4. Stop gap at 5/8 until Carney returns
With all this said, why not move Anasta to Centre, move Maubs back to the pack. Bring back Carney when fit; not when rehabilitated. Hopefully this will be sooner rather than later.
Benefits of Anasta in centres:
1. He is capable of 6 tackles a match
2. Can use his ball playing skills to set up his winger/fullback, allowing Mini to stay out of the attacking line
3. Can run at the opposition backs; not the forwards, thereby allowing him the confidence to take on the line again
4. He must be faster than Maubs
5. He isn't capable of playing anywhere else
Appreciate thoughts....
Comment
-
Originally posted by fred68 View PostAxe - no way that anasta is faster than aubbo.
But you are right, he's not suitable for any other position, that's why he should be dropped.
Perhaps to provide the fans some proper 1/2 time entertainment, Maubs should race Braith in the "Rooster Gift"Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Axe View PostShould be. Won't happen.
Perhaps to provide the fans some proper 1/2 time entertainment, Maubs should race Braith in the "Rooster Gift"
Comment
-
How about Carney in the centres and Linnett at wing. Sau is 4cm shorter apparently and Carney would be a similar player at centre... Just provide him good ball 5 metres out and he can force his way over the line with a bit more space then at wing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fred68 View PostThe only problem with that is that braith will still be trying to finish running the full 100 metres by the time the teams are ready to come back onto the field. He doesn't run that far for the whole year.Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland
Comment
Comment