Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roosters make play for Jeremy Smith?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Vasco View Post
    Ideally we land Folau for 2 seasons by then Latrell Mitchell will be ready for first grade.

    We do need a good front rower.
    Getting Folau for 1 or 2 years is exactly the way I would go as well! Smith can use that discretionary fund so that we can get Folau with not much of it counting towards our cap.
    The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

    Here's looking at you, kid.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by The Rooster Oracle View Post

      If Kennedy is gone for 2 years then I think it would be an extra good idea to go after Pauli Pauli and Junior Paulo! Both have size and power and are only young so we could get them cheap. I don't think Smith would come cheap and as Tommy said he is too old.

      I like this guy. Solid as a brick sh!thouse. takes 4 players to tackle him.
      Comment of the year:

      Andrew Johns, Semi-Final vs North Queensland ,

      "It's touched Lui's hand and travelled forward but that's not a knock on"

      Comment


      • #18
        It appears likely the game is about to change by reducing the number of interchanges. Perhaps the 17 becomes 16? Who knows but either way it should lead the game back to smaller more mobile forwards with big minutes. Possibly this means Dogs will offload their big boppers
        Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland

        Comment


        • #19
          Doesn't mean smaller forwards at all and I'm not sure why people keep saying it. Plenty of big men play big minutes in the nrl. Players like fifita would become the mvps with reduced interchange. If teams want to go smaller then big boppers 110kg plus who can play 60+ minutes and offload will be beasts.

          I wouldn't mind Paul Vaughan as our next recruitment target.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by The Axe View Post
            It appears likely the game is about to change by reducing the number of interchanges. Perhaps the 17 becomes 16? Who knows but either way it should lead the game back to smaller more mobile forwards with big minutes. Possibly this means Dogs will offload their big boppers

            Interesting you say that cause I'd say we'd have a mobile squad compare to the larger packs like souffs and the dogs.Most our backrow can play 80 minutes of footy and Friend can also play and defend for 80mins. I can't see any of the burgess's playing long minutes.
            Comment of the year:

            Andrew Johns, Semi-Final vs North Queensland ,

            "It's touched Lui's hand and travelled forward but that's not a knock on"

            Comment


            • #21
              How can there be no room in our pack? Meehan and Kennedy are both out of contention but were both likely to play some first grade in 2015. They have not been replaced.

              Comment


              • #22
                Gallen off contract would be a handy addition for at least a year or 2 ( pretty much 80 minutes / +150 meters guaranteed )

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by rooster69 View Post
                  Gallen off contract would be a handy addition for at least a year or 2 ( pretty much 80 minutes / +150 meters guaranteed )
                  He'll want upwards of $700k imo

                  How about Lussick?

                  We need another 'mad as a cut snake mistake freak' : )

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by 2026 View Post
                    He'll want upwards of $700k imo

                    How about Lussick?

                    We need another 'mad as a cut snake mistake freak' : )
                    Darcy is on the Raiders radar.
                    Ricky is trying his best to emulate our roster but he's gotta pay overs.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by theGman View Post

                      Darcy is on the Raiders radar.
                      Ricky is trying his best to emulate our roster but he's gotta pay overs.
                      His brother plays for our NYC so you'd think he'd give it a thought if we offered.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by BUDDY View Post

                        His brother plays for our NYC so you'd think he'd give it a thought if we offered.
                        I really rated him when he was at Manly but he hasn't managed to kick on.

                        I think his current salary is $450k a year.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          We don't need props.

                          We don't need backrowers.

                          We need a fullback and to sign/re-sign a 5/8.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Is LOD still around the club?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Tommy Smith View Post
                              We don't need props.

                              We don't need backrowers.

                              We need a fullback and to sign/re-sign a 5/8.
                              We won't buy a fullback if we want to keep Latrell. We need a centre for two years and to retain maloney.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Bigchook View Post

                                We won't buy a fullback if we want to keep Latrell. We need a centre for two years and to retain maloney.

                                Why do we need a centre? We have SKD, Fergo and Jennings

                                And I don't think Maloney's worth the money, he is a turnstile. As long as we have a kicker to replace him.

                                I'm sure we could find some LOD type player for a year or two at the end of his career. Souths have a heap of them and they are very effective, we don't really have one atm

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X