Originally posted by Andrew Walker
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gossip: sheck not happy with playing on the wing in 2015
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by turk-283 View PostAs a long time supporter of Easts and RL man, I hope it all works out for sheck playing #1 at easts but as a RL man in the know I think it will be short lived if anything.. Like it or not?I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mickey Lane View PostDo you think he will excel at FB if given the chance?
I personally don't think the Roosters have much option other than to go with Sheck, Fergo maybe doing some FB drills but I think that would be just to have cover in case Sheck got injured or completely lost form. The only other guy I would give a crack at FB to would be Nene McDonald. Latrell Mitchell for some people may also be a contender but IMO he is not ready for FG he hasn't even played U20s yet.I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostTurk has mad this forum so painful that I barely even post on here anymore but just to clear up a few things;
1 - Sheck hasn't been told he won't be playing Fullback
2 - Latrell Mitchell isn't even 18 yet so even if the club wanted to play him under the rules they're not allowed to
Move on ffs
So as a Super Duper Moderator can you kindly explain your role here?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BUDDY View PostSo as a Super Duper Moderator can you kindly explain your role here?
I don't have administrative powers and it's not my forum so quite frankly I wouldn't even try to set the standards and norms of this place even if I could.
This forum is largely self regulated & moderated and for a long time that was enjoyable, bad posters were called out on it and it was an enjoyable place to talk about the Roosters & Rugby League. However it's my opinion that those standards have deteriorated, Turk wouldn't have got one tenth of the responses he does today a few years ago.
It's only my opinion and clearly one in the minority as is evident by the shear weight of replies and credence that Turk attracts. Deleting Turks threads and posts because I think it makes this place worse off would be an abuse of my powers and ignorant to what is clearly now the type of forum this is & just because I think that's shit doesn't mean it is the same for everyone.
End of the day it's only my opinion and it shouldn't carry anymore weight than any one elses just because I was handed some moderating powers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostJust to moderate where and how threads appear to the end user basically and to assist with any questions or requests users have.
I don't have administrative powers and it's not my forum so quite frankly I wouldn't even try to set the standards and norms of this place even if I could.
This forum is largely self regulated & moderated and for a long time that was enjoyable, bad posters were called out on it and it was an enjoyable place to talk about the Roosters & Rugby League. However it's my opinion that those standards have deteriorated, Turk wouldn't have got one tenth of the responses he does today a few years ago.
It's only my opinion and clearly one in the minority as is evident by the shear weight of replies and credence that Turk attracts. Deleting Turks threads and posts because I think it makes this place worse off would be an abuse of my powers and ignorant to what is clearly now the type of forum this is & just because I think that's shit doesn't mean it is the same for everyone.
End of the day it's only my opinion and it shouldn't carry anymore weight than any one elses just because I was handed some moderating powers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostTurk has mad this forum so painful that I barely even post on here anymore but just to clear up a few things;
1 - Sheck hasn't been told he won't be playing Fullback
2 - Latrell Mitchell isn't even 18 yet so even if the club wanted to play him under the rules they're not allowed to
Move on ffs
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostJust to moderate where and how threads appear to the end user basically and to assist with any questions or requests users have.
I don't have administrative powers and it's not my forum so quite frankly I wouldn't even try to set the standards and norms of this place even if I could.
This forum is largely self regulated & moderated and for a long time that was enjoyable, bad posters were called out on it and it was an enjoyable place to talk about the Roosters & Rugby League. However it's my opinion that those standards have deteriorated, Turk wouldn't have got one tenth of the responses he does today a few years ago.
It's only my opinion and clearly one in the minority as is evident by the shear weight of replies and credence that Turk attracts. Deleting Turks threads and posts because I think it makes this place worse off would be an abuse of my powers and ignorant to what is clearly now the type of forum this is & just because I think that's shit doesn't mean it is the same for everyone.
End of the day it's only my opinion and it shouldn't carry anymore weight than any one elses just because I was handed some moderating powers.SUPER DRAGON!
Comment
Comment