Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charges from last night

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    After watching the replay Napa has clear separation and Suttons direction change when hit by the first defender is what makes it look bad at full speed, there is definitely enough evidence to contest the grading and have it reduced..

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by turk-283 View Post
      After watching the replay Napa has clear separation and Suttons direction change when hit by the first defender is what makes it look bad at full speed, there is definitely enough evidence to contest the grading and have it reduced..
      I think that's right Turk, I just cannot fathom how a relatively innocuous shoulder charge such as that could result in a player being suspended at all, let alone sidelined for a month...

      While, like many in the Rugby League fraternity, I think the shoulder charge ban is a complete and utter joke, I accept the fact that under current rules it is an illegal play and warrants a penalty on the field...

      What I have a real problem with is players having to front the judiciary for the shoulder charge. Unlike the head-high tackle, wrestling moves designed to break knees and shoulders, spear tackles etc which all have the clear potential to cause serious injury to a player each and every time...

      And unlike your 'contrary conduct' type offences, such as knee lifting, kicking, striking, biting, spitting etc...

      Shoulder charges in my opinion are just another tough collision (as is most tackling) but rarely cause any, let alone serious, injuries to players... It is therefore ludicrous in the extreme that players are actually being suspended for shoulder charges! Suspended for a tough play that is not 'contrary conduct' and not designed to inflict injury.

      What other on-field play that has minimal potential and very low likelihood to injure a player goes to the judiciary???

      If shoulder charges are to be banned from the field of play, well I disagree vehemently but if that is the rule, that is the rule... But taking players out of games for a month via the judiciary???

      Complete joke, a punishment not befitting the crime, and yet further proof the people running the NRL don't have a clue about the very fabric of the game of Rugby League.

      Rant over!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by turk-283 View Post
        After watching the replay Napa has clear separation and Suttons direction change when hit by the first defender is what makes it look bad at full speed, there is definitely enough evidence to contest the grading and have it reduced..
        I looked at the highlights on bigpond sport and I can't see what all the fuss is about to be honest. I'm glad I'm not the only one. Far worse has been done this year and blatantly ignored. I saw Jimmy's head nearly spin around and almost completely get ripped off last night and nothing was done. The tough little bloke just got up and got on with it..99% of others would have lay down..
        "Be good enough to forgive people but don't be stupid enough to trust them again."

        Comment


        • #34
          Not that I agree with it But I think the severity of the charge is a result of Sutton already being held up in the tackle and being totally defenceless when Dylan hits him
          I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by turk-283 View Post
            After watching the replay Napa has clear separation and Suttons direction change when hit by the first defender is what makes it look bad at full speed, there is definitely enough evidence to contest the grading and have it reduced..
            Weren't you put on report last night? Was hoping you get suspended till 2015, You can't trust the MRC

            Comment


            • #36
              To be honest I think we can cover Napa easily so im not worried. Guerra is a different matter
              Embrace the Hate! JC

              Comment


              • #37
                Cronk penalised for a shoulder charge off the ball.

                No report, no channel 9 replay.

                What a surprise.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Tommy Smith View Post
                  Cronk penalised for a shoulder charge off the ball.

                  No report, no channel 9 replay.

                  What a surprise.
                  I think they maybe without Norrie next week, that was a terrible elbow to Parkers head, if that was JWH, Rabs would have gone off.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Tommy Smith View Post
                    Cronk penalised for a shoulder charge off the ball.

                    No report, no channel 9 replay.

                    What a surprise.
                    good. will help Napa's defense!
                    Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by ROC181 View Post
                      Weren't you put on report last night? Was hoping you get suspended till 2015, You can't trust the MRC
                      Aaaah your one that wants the tough players out, I prefer to win against the best opp..

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by The Axe View Post
                        good. will help Napa's defense!
                        Robbo will be analysing all games this weekend to find something to hang his hat on, RE; Napas grading..

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X