I don't think I could handle hearing this mentioned as such in the media one more time.
Now I have a lot of time for Simon Dwyer and I hope the kid gets better. He fully deserves the money raised this weekend after the NRL abandoned him.
But...
That hit was a stone cold shoulder square to the face. It was a blatant penalty. Exactly how Steve Clarke didn't award us a penalty for it I'll never quite know.
What's more, in today's game it'd be a 5 week suspension.
Given this why do we have to hear so many idiots in the media spew the same old shit about it being "the hit of the century"?
I suppose it's the same as our "ill discipline"... they don't have a mind of their own and just sprout whatever they've heard.
Am I seeing the hit wrong? Is it just me who saw it as a blatant and brutal high shot to the head?
Now I have a lot of time for Simon Dwyer and I hope the kid gets better. He fully deserves the money raised this weekend after the NRL abandoned him.
But...
That hit was a stone cold shoulder square to the face. It was a blatant penalty. Exactly how Steve Clarke didn't award us a penalty for it I'll never quite know.
What's more, in today's game it'd be a 5 week suspension.
Given this why do we have to hear so many idiots in the media spew the same old shit about it being "the hit of the century"?
I suppose it's the same as our "ill discipline"... they don't have a mind of their own and just sprout whatever they've heard.
Am I seeing the hit wrong? Is it just me who saw it as a blatant and brutal high shot to the head?
Comment