Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JWH Try

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Pass the Ball View Post
    Since when is shielding the ball considered playing at the ball
    Are you serious? Of course shielding is playing at it. I cannot believe people here (kegs excluded) don't know the rules.
    ...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post
      Are you serious? Of course shielding is playing at it. I cannot believe people here (kegs excluded) don't know the rules.
      He doesn't play at it, Jennings knocks it into him. Pretty simple,20m re-start move along nothing else to see here

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Chook View Post
        Not to mention the two on one strip off SKD after his beak.
        The mid air tackle on Mini that went unpunished.
        The non tap by Wright that lead to a nulla try.
        And who can forget the Nulla's 65mins of 100% disciplined football.

        The list is endless.

        Chook.
        That's what really f***ing pisses me off Chook!! The refs f***ing hate giving us penalties!! I just love how teams become magically disciplined against us!!

        Here is an interesting little stat. We have received 35 penalties so far this year and $ouff$ have received 67. What a f***ing joke!! Teams become magically disciplined against us, and then magically ill-disciplined against $ouff$!! Only a total DC can't see what goes on!!

        And then you throw on top of that the decisions such as the JWH no try along with other such decisions which spring to mind like the Cords no try against eels in round 2, and who of course can forget the stitch up against manly which proves that the refs and video refs c***s really have it in for us!!

        Just like death and taxes you can be assured that the Roosters will be the most penalized team and receive the least amount penalties year after f***ing year!! But according to a certain DC you can't read anything into it!
        The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

        Here's looking at you, kid.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by BigMike View Post
          It's just hilarious in the current scheme of things that the one time the referee does back himself, he gets it so wrong. However 95% of the time they go upstairs without need.

          We have such a poor standard of officiating.
          Absolutely. It was interesting to read kingilly's post about refs dropping out in big numbers in junior footy.
          Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Rooboy View Post
            He doesn't play at it, Jennings knocks it into him. Pretty simple,20m re-start move along nothing else to see here
            My thoughts exactly Rooboy.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by The Rooster Oracle View Post
              That's what really f***ing pisses me off Chook!! The refs f***ing hate giving us penalties!! I just love how teams become magically disciplined against us!!

              Here is an interesting little stat. We have received 35 penalties so far this year and $ouff$ have received 67. What a f***ing joke!! Teams become magically disciplined against us, and then magically ill-disciplined against $ouff$!! Only a total DC can't see what goes on!!

              And then you throw on top of that the decisions such as the JWH no try along with other such decisions which spring to mind like the Cords no try against eels in round 2, and who of course can forget the stitch up against manly which proves that the refs and video refs c***s really have it in for us!!

              Just like death and taxes you can be assured that the Roosters will be the most penalized team and receive the least amount penalties year after f***ing year!! But according to a certain DC you can't read anything into it!
              You said this last year... you have no credibility.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post
                Are you serious? Of course shielding is playing at it. I cannot believe people here (kegs excluded) don't know the rules.
                I think it may be you that does not understand the rules.

                If a fullback shields the ball (i.e gets himself between the ball and the attacking player) does not touch it and it goes dead it is a 20M re-start. If he touches the ball (i.e plays at the ball) and it goes dead it is a drop-out.

                Pretty simple...

                Comment


                • #38
                  I love how that there is this total DC on here who talks about credibility, and yet he got himself banned last year for saying nasty comments to fellow posters on here about their families. On top of that he comes back on begging to stay, promising by giving his word that he will leave straight after the GF and yet he still lingers in here like a nasty foul shane fatso richardson fart in an elevator.
                  The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                  Here's looking at you, kid.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by The Rooster Oracle View Post
                    I love how that there is this total DC on here who talks about credibility, and yet he got himself banned last year for saying nasty comments to fellow posters on here about their families. On top of that he comes back on begging to stay, promising by giving his word that he will leave straight after the GF and yet he still lingers in here like a nasty foul shane fatso richardson fart in an elevator.
                    The Chookpen is corrupt.

                    Rooster_6 is a 'The Wall' man through and through, how is he on the moderators list?

                    It's not about the bannings we get, it's about the bannings we don't get that piss me off!

                    They want Andrew Walker to win Chookpenner of the Year!

                    COURRPT!!!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I think it's strange that they wouldn't go to the vidiot for that yet refer 90% of the rest.
                      Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by kegs2 View Post
                        The Chookpen is corrupt.

                        Rooster_6 is a 'The Wall' man through and through, how is he on the moderators list?

                        It's not about the bannings we get, it's about the bannings we don't get that piss me off!

                        They want Andrew Walker to win Chookpenner of the Year!

                        COURRPT!!!
                        No all I want is to be a Gold member and whilst we are at it TRO as well How such credibl;e posters are not awarded this distinction is a disgrace

                        Now when I enquired about this the moderating team said they picked certain worthy members and there would be additions Which so far have not eventuated

                        Do the moderators expect us to believe and accept that in the last two years nobody else has been worthy of such an honour being bestowed upon them that they have chsoen to bestow upon themselves and their mates
                        Last edited by Andrew Walker; 04-21-2014, 08:02 PM.
                        I respect all our moderators here. Past present and even future. Always have done and always will do a wonderful job.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          When you get there Andy, Iam sure you will enjoy the 4 threads posted there this year.
                          ...

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            The non awarding of that try could very well have cost us the game.We were very lucky not to have been dudded again by poor refereing.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                              No all I want is to be a Gold member and whilst we are at it TRO as well How such credibl;e posters are not awarded this distinction is a disgrace

                              Now when I enquired about this the moderating team said they picked certain worthy members and there would be additions Which so far have not eventuated

                              Do the moderators expect us to believe and accept that in the last two years nobody else has been worthy of such an honour being bestowed upon them that they have chsoen to bestow upon themselves and their mates
                              What do you believe happens there that gets you so worked up that you are not there?

                              Its probably like being offered a box at the footy, sounds good til you have been there, and realise it's full of uptight pricks who have no interest in the game at all, and you look like an outcast because you cheer your team.

                              Enjoy the madness like the rest of the blue collar penners.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X