fittler on the sunday footy show

[roorooman]

Apparently fittler made some good comments about JWH and how he should be able to get off.

Anyone know what he said ?

[supermario]

Fitler compared JHW's hit to one that pommeroy did on Gidley when the sharks played the knights.

Pommeroy was reported but NOT suspended

Pommery hit gidley front on with his forearm/elbow in the neck

[ChookMaster]

Its true. Pomeroy charged at gidley, jwh was more like a bracing for impact/fend off. If you compare the two you would find that Pomeroy's looks more vicious.

[Guest]

Its true. Pomeroy charged at gidley, jwh was more like a bracing for impact/fend off. If you compare the two you would find that Pomeroy's looks more vicious. Imo if the nrl manage to find a way to turn this around and still charge jwh. Well then you know what their intentions are,To make sure we dont win the comp.

It must be so frustrating living in the parallel universe of conspriracy theory world.

You actually believe that they sit around a table and decide who they want to win the comp and then administer the comp accordingly?

If you do believe that, you are insane, and you can only exist on an online forum. Certainly not speaking with people face to face who follow the game. It's the thing that makes this place such a borefest, for so much of the time. All the anonymous nutcases. Together in one place, and communicating with the only people who'll listen to them for longer than 5 seconds - the other nutcases.

The problem with JWH is that based on the Pomeroy precedent, he should not have been charged.

But it was a mistake not to charge Pomeroy. The simple fact of the matter is that they both should be charged. You just can't go around running into defenders with your elbow raised.

[Guest]

It must be so frustrating living in the parallel universe of conspriracy theory world.

You actually believe that they sit around a table and decide who they want to win the comp and then administer the comp accordingly?

If you do believe that, you are insane, and you can only exist on an online forum. Certainly not speaking with people face to face who follow the game. It's the thing that makes this place such a borefest, for so much of the time. All the anonymous nutcases. Together in one place, and communicating with the only people who'll listen to them for longer than 5 seconds - the other nutcases.

The problem with JWH is that based on the Pomeroy precedent, he should not have been charged.

But it was a mistake not to charge Pomeroy. The simple fact of the matter is that they both should be charged. You just can't go around running into defenders with your elbow raised.

alcho cheeks did it hurt watching us win last Friday night? how much money did you have on souffs?

[The Brain]

It must be so frustrating living in the parallel universe of conspriracy theory world.

You actually believe that they sit around a table and decide who they want to win the comp and then administer the comp accordingly?

If you do believe that, you are insane, and you can only exist on an online forum. Certainly not speaking with people face to face who follow the game. It's the thing that makes this place such a borefest, for so much of the time. All the anonymous nutcases. Together in one place, and communicating with the only people who'll listen to them for longer than 5 seconds - the other nutcases.

The problem with JWH is that based on the Pomeroy precedent, he should not have been charged.

But it was a mistake not to charge Pomeroy. The simple fact of the matter is that they both should be charged. You just can't go around running into defenders with your elbow raised.

Thats about as simple as it gets .The precedent now id is based on Pomeroy...is he should fight and get off.

[Guest]

Rnd 26 2013, 24mins 30 secs; g burgess on Isaac liu.. Forearm to throat? what you recon?

[tri-hard]

It must be so frustrating living in the parallel universe of conspriracy theory world.

You actually believe that they sit around a table and decide who they want to win the comp and then administer the comp accordingly?

If you do believe that, you are insane, and you can only exist on an online forum. Certainly not speaking with people face to face who follow the game. It's the thing that makes this place such a borefest, for so much of the time. All the anonymous nutcases. Together in one place, and communicating with the only people who'll listen to them for longer than 5 seconds - the other nutcases.

The problem with JWH is that based on the Pomeroy precedent, he should not have been charged.

But it was a mistake not to charge Pomeroy. The simple fact of the matter is that they both should be charged. You just can't go around running into defenders with your elbow raised.

I don't believe they sit around a table and conspire , that would be stupid, they have there minds well and truly made up before than. Anyone that thinks the decisons and penalties that have gone against Easts, in the last half a dozen years or so is just a coincidence is the one living in never never land! These ''real live people who know about football', that you talk about, are they other residents in your asylum?

[Johnny.]

Any thought of conspiracy is paranoia writ large and you'll be sitting rolling metal balls complaining about missing ward room keys and stolen frozen strawberries if you keep it up.

There is, however, bias against us. It's Nick Politis and everything he did to save us.

In 1995, if Fittler and Gould go to a Super League team, the ARL is finished and done.

[Salvatori Grubber]

...and Johns and Fulton.