Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Article about Friendy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Article about Friendy

    Was from fox sports


    THE fickle nature of sport has been highlighted by the Rabbitohs' last month. Flying high, competition favourites with no signs of slowing down and suddenly an injury to Greg Inglis, they lose to the Dragons.
    They get things back on track against the Gold Coast Titans before a disastrous trip to Townsville where they are belted by the Cowboys, and worse lose another key man, John Sutton.
    On a bright note, both men are expected to be back for the finals.
    But for all the big four teams, the Roosters, Souths, Manly and Melbourne, it shows the vulnerability of how a season's hard work can be washed away by a key man's simple twist of an ankle.
    All the big four teams, of which the 2013 premiers will most certainly come from, have one player that they simply cannot afford to lose.
    These are the men that they simply can't win without.
    STORM - CAMERON SMITH
    Surprise, surprise. The greatest big game player of the modern era, and you can throw them all in, Wally, Alfie, Joey, Bozo, Lazzo.
    When a player achieves success, while it fuels performances, over a period of time it tends to kill desire, but the fire in Smith's belly is showing no signs of burning out.
    If the Storm were to lose a Cronk or a Slater, it certainly would put a dent in their chances, but only the absence of Cameron Smith would make me put a line through them.
    Let's not forget back in 2008 when the Storm took the field on grand final day, with the chance to be the first team since the Broncos of 1998 to go back-to-back.
    Manly 40 to Storm 0. Cameron Smith was on the sidelines suspended.
    SOUTHS - GREG INGLIS
    Everything about South Sydney changes when Greg Inglis is not at fullback.
    Inglis' brutal kick returns immediately gets Souths on the front foot, and from there, they just roll up field using Issac Luke as the focal point of their attack, off the momentum that Greg has created.
    Without Inglis, they lack thrust and penetration on early tackles and as a consequence play too sideways, in an attempt to get something started.
    If Greg returns from this knee injury 100 per cent fit, this little stint on the sideline will be a blessing, as it will allow him to freshen up after a tough State of Origin campaign.
    ROOSTERS - JAKE FRIEND
    Sonny Bill provides the class, Mitchell Pearce and James Maloney provide the direction, but Jake Friend is the driving force through the middle.
    Nothing gives a football team punch and spark like a dummy-half with dynamite in his boots, and Jake has plenty in 2013.
    Without a doubt, the competition's most improved individual, if Cameron Smith had broken down during Origin, they tell me Jake Friend was in.
    Over the past month the Roosters' attack has become more direct and much more effective, much of that can be attributed to Jake Friend.
    The frequency and speed of Friend's runs out of dummy-half means Roosters halves Mitchell Pearce and James Maloney have no choice but to push up and play direct at the defence, or else be left behind.
    To me it explains why Maloney and Pearce played so differently at Origin level.
    But the other factor which makes Friend so important to the Roosters is his toughness.
    Trent Robinson, said to me recently, "He doesn't get injured, but don't think he doesn't get hurt."
    MANLY - BRETT STEWART
    Kieran Foran is probably the form player in the competition at this moment, while Daly Cherry-Evans just continues to get better and better, but Brett Stewart is still Manly's most important player.
    Foran and Daly put on the plays, but it's Brett who gives the play energy and life.
    He also gives Manly great direction to where the ball needs to go.
    Stewart will pop up on an inside ball through the middle if he senses vulnerability there, or you'll see him link up with his brother Glenn on the far right hand side if he sees the opposition short.
    Every year, everyone seems to forget about Manly, but if Brett Stewart is fully fit and firing they will take a power of stopping.

  • #2
    The main positive I find about this article is that, as good as he has been, without Friend I still think we are a force. Souffs, Melbourne and Manly are farked without GI, Smith and Stewart.

    I could be wrong but I definitely disagree with Johns in saying without Friend we can't win. Hopefully we don't have to find out.

    Comment


    • #3
      Who would have thought 12 months ago Jake Friend would be our X factor.

      He's come a long way.

      We wouldn't be leading the comp without him.

      Chook.

      Comment


      • #4
        Our MVP is now finally recognised.

        If he got hurt and Morts was our first choice rake we would not be making any GFs.

        Comment


        • #5
          He's been outstanding. But the article has it wrong: it's JWH who's the real key to our success (with Friend close behind).
          Making Steve Naughton look like Vince Mellars...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Salvatori Grubber View Post
            He's been outstanding. But the article has it wrong: it's JWH who's the real key to our success (with Friend close behind).
            We have won games without JWH! I don't think we would without Friendy in the team! Directing the team around the park is more important than being the team enforcer!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Chook View Post
              Who would have thought 12 months ago Jake Friend would be our X factor.
              He's come a long way.
              We wouldn't be leading the comp without him.
              Chook.
              Chook,
              yourself, myself & most others (including fred) knew Jake would flourish once the mad professor was farked off.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by theGman View Post
                Chook,
                yourself, myself & most others (including fred) knew Jake would flourish once the mad professor was farked off.
                You can definitely throw me into that category along with yourselves Gman, as I said on many many occasions (just like Fred) last year that once as you say "the mad professor was farked off", our players would improve out of sight! I said that about all our players except for Bwaif and Mini, and I am more than happy to say that I was wrong about Mini!

                Imo Friend is second to only Smith as being the best hooker in the NRL, so Johns is not far wrong about how we would really miss him if he were to be unavailable. The thing is though we are such a brilliant unit under Robbo that we would adapt and continue to be the strongest force in the competition!
                The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                Here's looking at you, kid.

                Comment


                • #9
                  It's nice to have a winning team where no-one can really successfully identify who is the key player. So far we have proven we can win without SBW, Pearce, Maloney and JWH. Hopefully we don't have to prove the same about Friend but I suspect we could.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by TheEye View Post
                    It's nice to have a winning team where no-one can really successfully identify who is the key player. So far we have proven we can win without SBW, Pearce, Maloney and JWH. Hopefully we don't have to prove the same about Friend but I suspect we could.
                    Agreed, it is very difficult to pin point if choosing just one player as being the key to our side as there have been so many stand outs this year which is so refreshing to finally be in this tremendous position!
                    The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                    Here's looking at you, kid.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It will be interesting to see if we can win with out LOD and Mini.
                      They may be out X factor.
                      Direction from the back from Mini and the Muscle up front from LOD.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I don't think he's our x factor but he's arguably the most important player in our team especially if you consider the potential replacements if he was to go down at some point during the season.

                        The article nails it on the head, he keeps us playing direct which is what allows the likes of Maloney & SBW to play with so much time, space and freedom on the edges. Post Cam Smith he will be the best hooker in the game, even with Farah still around imo.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by TheEye View Post
                          It's nice to have a winning team where no-one can really successfully identify who is the key player. So far we have proven we can win without SBW, Pearce, Maloney and JWH. Hopefully we don't have to prove the same about Friend but I suspect we could.
                          You forgot Jennings and Cordner too. We've won without them as well.

                          Out of all the top 4 sides, we have been the best without our 'star' player in the side (SBW). GI was injured with Souths and they lose, Manly didnt have Stewart first half of the season they werent going too good. Storm didnt have Smith, Slater and Cronk during SOO which is a bit different but still struggled and we still won when we didnt have Pearce, Maloney, Jennings & Cordner.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            And lets not forget we've also had lengthy periods with JWH, Moa, FPN and Kennedy out. While it seems to be accepted wisdom that we've had a golden run as far as injuries are concerned this year, we've actually had our share of talent on the sidelines at various times.

                            Were Friend to be out, Morts would go OK directing our attack IMO. He would struggle massively if he had to pick up Jakes defensive load however. That's where we'd really notice the difference.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'd be more comfortable with Mortimer filling Jake's shoes than Pearce's or Maloney's.

                              We'd have to adjust our game without Friend, but I don't think thrusting Mortimer into big games at halfback or five eighth would go too well.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X