Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Its time to make the switch - 26Rounds article

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Its time to make the switch - 26Rounds article

    A very well thought out article from the 26Rounds site........

    (http://26rounds.com/2013/04/11/its-t...and-heres-why/)

    It’s time to make the switch: RTS to fullback is a must, and here’s why
    April 11, 2013 · by jakejarmel · in Blog. ·

    Make no mistake, Anthony Michiello is an all-time favourite here at the 26 Rounds offices.

    We’ve watched him over the years win a premiership, break the record for most tries by a Rooster ever (118 and counting), represent the club proudly in State of Origin, take the Golden Boot as the best player in the world in 2005, make an artform out of bomb catching, come back from serious back injuries and make Origin again, and lend his mobile phone to players that really need it (Mark Gasnier still hasn’t thanked him for that).

    But we’ve also watched him become a step slower than most fullbacks in recent years, we’ve watched him struggle to defend in-goal grubbers, struggle to get through initial contact and struggle to break the line of his on volition in recent years.

    And while Mini has maximised every inch of what he is now capable of at the age of 32, it’s high time that Roger Tuivasa-Sheck be handed the reins at fullback.

    He simply offers far more in attack and is safe under the high ball. And he’s not a winger.

    This is more than an opinion, and we can prove the reasoning behind the need for the move with simple stats and analysis.

    Attack.

    The statistics are remarkably close between each player with a slight edge overall to the Sheck.

    Anthony Minichello (five games):

    - 67 Runs at 13.4 per game.

    - 538 metres at 8.02 metres per run, 107 metres per game.

    - 12 tackle breaks/busts at 0.17 per run, 2.4 per game.

    - One line break at 0.2 per game.


    Roger Tuivasa-Sheck (five games):

    - 64 runs at 12.8 per game.

    - 537 metres at 8.39 per run, 107.4 per game.

    - 15 tackle breaks/busts at 0.23 per run, 3.0 per game.

    - Three line breaks at 0.6 per game.

    However, you have to remember that RTS is playing on the wing where he doesn’t get the same opportunities on a regular basis to return the ball, hit gaps, bump off players and inject himself into the game. Instead, he is accruing slightly superior numbers by looking for the ball and coming in off his wing for a run before returning back out there.

    His metres per run are also skewed, as most of his runs come off dummy half darts from kick returns and at a set defence, whereas Mini can easily make 20 metres on a standard kick return but doesn’t.

    If The Sheck is moved into the middle of the back, he is more likely to break the line, bump off tackles and make metres. He has far superior footwork, is much quicker, and can make it through the initial impact for a few extra metres.

    (For what it’s worth, the error count for each player probably fails what everyone naturally thinks: that The Sheck has better hands. Each has just five errors — although Mini has two games with two errors while The Sheck has made errors in four separate games.)

    Defence.

    Mini also has a great tackling technique. Mini, through several back operations, has had problematic pieces of his spine SHAVED CLEAN OFF and had vertebrae FUSED TOGETHER. How he gets out of bed in the morning is beyond me, let alone how he manages to play 80 minutes of rugby league every single week.

    But it’s those procedures that — and this is just a guess — have led to his biggest weakness: a weakness that was exploited more than once last year and at least once this year.

    He simply can’t bend over and pick up or swipe at a rolling ball.

    Teams are aware of this and target the in-goal with rolling grubbers, and Mini either runs around the ball or waits for the extra bounce before making a play at it. Bill Tupou of the Warriors took advantage of this in round 2 and many teams used a similar strategy last year.

    If you put it up high against him, Mini is still one of the top three safest fullbacks in the league — his spill of an impossible spiral bomb last week notwithstanding.

    The Sheck so far has struggled with what I like to call Chris Walker Syndrome — a strange disease that causes wingers to become disoriented and come off their wing to disastrous results.

    Of the 12 tries scored against the Roosters this year, five have been scored on his wing. It’s not all his fault: Shaun Kenny-Dowall must take some blame for his defensive deficiencies, but all of those tries have been untouched — three from Nathan Merritt, one from Chris McQueen who had time to swivel, make a cuppa and dive over in an angled run to the corner, and Edrick Lee last week when Sonny Bill was the widest man out right.

    By comparison, we can directly attribute one blunder to Mini (the Bill Tupou disaster due to his inability to swipe out a grubber from Shaun Johnson).

    But their weaknesses (Mini on grubbers and running the ball back, RTS in coming off the wing too far to defend) would be nullified with a simple switch.

    Teams will not grubber at a wing, and Mini would be protected somewhat by two dead-ball lines (the side and the back). He never came off his wing during the 2001-2002 seasons when he was exclusively a winger, and he actually debuted and played those seasons on the wing The Sheck occupies now.

    And RTS can follow the ball as a fullback ala his training last year in the Under 20′s, which is a habit he has seemingly kept while starting his career out wide.

    Summary.

    RTS should be in the Number One as soon as possible.

    I love Mini. I’m one of his biggest defenders and his place in Roosters history is assured.

    But this isn’t history. This is now, and the Roosters are on the verge of something that can only be fully recognised by moving The Sheck to The Back.

    RTS has trained as a fullback in limited exposure to the sport, while Mini started as a winger. And while many may say that it’s hard to captain on the wing, Michael Crocker’s doing a pretty good job of it from the Left Right Out position at Souths.

    If this team is to be truly great, we need a brilliant fullback — not a formerly brilliant fullback. If there wasn’t a better option for fullback at the Roosters, you’d be OK with leaving him back there. But they do have a better option.

    Roger Tuivasa-Sheck is the future and the present at the position, and will eventually become the team’s full-time fullback.

    It should just happen sooner rather than later
    Last edited by Waylander; 04-11-2013, 05:54 PM. Reason: Remove photo tags.

  • #2
    Dunno who he is but he's spot on.

    Chook.

    Comment


    • #3
      I think jakejarmel has taken snippets from 'The Chookpen', collaborated it and made an opinion.

      I don't disagree with what he is saying, but I think he echoes what a lot of us here are already thinking and have been for some time.
      Last edited by 007; 04-11-2013, 06:45 PM.
      "Do you expect me to talk"? "No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die".

      Comment


      • #4
        One of the best threads this year!

        Comment


        • #5
          One of the best articles I've seen about us. No bias, no disrespect, all stats and friendly judgements. It's also very true and I don't think any true Roosters fan who watches every game can disagree.

          Comment


          • #6
            Yes, its a good thread, respectful, forthright, and intelligent, all of us in here, can see it, the writer of the article can see it, the longer Robinson waits to implement the change, the more he will be considered to be a Smith clone, and none of us here want that.

            Comment


            • #7
              Why not compare apples with apples ? When providing stats please use the same denominator otherwise it comes across like biased reporting (ala Telecrap) - what's the difference between:

              "One line break at 0.2 per game."

              and

              "Three line breaks at 0.6 per game."

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by roorooman View Post
                Why not compare apples with apples ? When providing stats please use the same denominator otherwise it comes across like biased reporting (ala Telecrap) - what's the difference between:

                "One line break at 0.2 per game."

                and

                "Three line breaks at 0.6 per game."
                Hey mate, I wrote the site. I'm a roosters fan and its a roosters site, so if anything its biased its towards the Roosters

                Normally I wouldn't hop on and comment but I just wanted to point out the stats you're referring to are both apples...Mini has made 1 line break in 5 games, RTS has made 3 in five games. The 0.6 per game and 0.2 per game are average line breaks each made per game. Probably should have been clearer in the article.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Jake Jarmel View Post
                  Hey mate, I wrote the site. I'm a roosters fan and its a roosters site, so if anything its biased its towards the Roosters

                  Normally I wouldn't hop on and comment but I just wanted to point out the stats you're referring to are both apples...Mini has made 1 line break in 5 games, RTS has made 3 in five games. The 0.6 per game and 0.2 per game are average line breaks each made per game. Probably should have been clearer in the article.
                  And that's playing outside of a SKD !!!!!!!!!!

                  With the passes he throws, any footballer would be lucky to get 1 linebreak playing outside of Skidmark.
                  Comment of the year:

                  Andrew Johns, Semi-Final vs North Queensland ,

                  "It's touched Lui's hand and travelled forward but that's not a knock on"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by davos View Post
                    And that's playing outside of a SKD !!!!!!!!!!

                    With the passes he throws, any footballer would be lucky to get 1 linebreak playing outside of Skidmark.
                    Especially when he passes like Joe Namath...I take it everyone saw that sweet, awesome pass last week that just happened to float three yards forward?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Jake Jarmel View Post
                      Hey mate, I wrote the site. I'm a roosters fan and its a roosters site, so if anything its biased its towards the Roosters

                      Normally I wouldn't hop on and comment but I just wanted to point out the stats you're referring to are both apples...Mini has made 1 line break in 5 games, RTS has made 3 in five games. The 0.6 per game and 0.2 per game are average line breaks each made per game. Probably should have been clearer in the article.
                      Great post. Well constructed and respectful arguement. You'll have plenty agree with you on here.
                      Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Has a lot of good articles and reviews. His weekly roosters player ratings especially.

                        That said, how many times do you have to retweet the same article!! I saw it the first time!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Dubai View Post
                          Has a lot of good articles and reviews. His weekly roosters player ratings especially.

                          That said, how many times do you have to retweet the same article!! I saw it the first time!
                          Haha sorry mate, i promise to cut it down...try and do it only three times

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by The Axe View Post
                            Great post. Well constructed and respectful arguement. You'll have plenty agree with you on here.
                            Cheers mate, I haven't seen many people actually disagree with it on Twitter. To make it clear, I love Mini and he's one of my favourite all time Roosters, but when you have a better option you have to use it. You just have to.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by roorooman View Post
                              Why not compare apples with apples ? When providing stats please use the same denominator otherwise it comes across like biased reporting (ala Telecrap) - what's the difference between:

                              "One line break at 0.2 per game."

                              and

                              "Three line breaks at 0.6 per game."
                              0.4 linbebreaks per game.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X